CO - SEN: Correcting the Record on the Public Option

by: Max Berger

Fri Feb 19, 2010 at 06:45


( - promoted by AdamGreen)  Colorado Senator Michael Bennet’s bold stance in favor of using reconciliation to pass the public option has riled some feathers in  Colorado conservative editorial pages. The Grand Junction Sentinal published an op-ed asking if he was “standing on principle when it comes to health care reform or is he playing to the political left.” In fact, Michael Bennet's stand in favor of the public option is good politics and good policy. According to a recent Research 2000 Poll, the people of Colorado support the public option 58% - 36%, including 59% of Independents. 18 senators, including members of leadership and committee chairs, have already signed on to the letter at WhipCongress.com calling on Harry Reid to use reconciliation to pass the public option.
Max Berger :: CO - SEN: Correcting the Record on the Public Option

The op-ed suffers from a number of popular misconceptions that need to be remedied. Let's take them step by step:  

Dwindling public support for the health care bills drafted by Congress — down to 38 percent support according to a Pew Research Center survey this month? Bennet: What of it?

In fact, the public option is an object lesson in how Democrats lose support for their efforts by not being populist enough. The public option has consistently been more popular than health care reform overall and still has the support of a majority nationwide. The health care bill became less popular when the public option was stripped from the Senate bill.  

Repeated Democratic electoral losses due in part to public angst over the liberal agenda and anger about extreme partisanship in Congress? Apparently it doesn’t mean anything to Bennet.

The lesson of the Democrats election losses is that they haven't gone far enough. When 32% of voters that voted for Obama and then voted for Scott Brown in Massachusetts don't like the Senate bill, but 82% like the public option, the political lesson is clear.  

Increasing numbers of Democrats choosing not to seek re-election, including centrist Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana, who said liberals had become “tone deaf” and were “overreaching” in pushing their agenda? Forget that. Push it through, Bennet argues.

The American people care about only one thing: results. They don’t care what type of procedure is used to pass reform, as long as reform works for them. The American people are likely to reward politicians who stand up for once controversial programs that become an important part of the social contract (as with Medicare and Social Security).  

Tea parties and town hall meetings to protest government spending and health care reform? Bennet says, No big deal.

Ah yes, the 33% of Americans that support the Tea Parties. As pointed out by Matthew Yglesias, "that is less than the 38 percent of Americans have a favorable view of Cuba and the 36 percent that are favorably disposed toward socialism."  

Michael Bennet’s stand in favor of using reconciliation to pass the public option is standing strong on principle and playing to the political left. The Republicans have joined with the health insurance industry and a small group of industry affiliated Democrats to block a deficit reducing provision that has overwhelming public support. Using reconciliation to pass the public option, as the Republicans did to pass both Bush tax cuts, is completely in keeping with the letter and spirit of the procedure.  

Michael Bennet deserves the support of Coloradans who want their politicians to stand up for common sense in the face of faulty conventional wisdom and deep-pocketed opposition. Join the effort at WhipCongress.com to support progressive leadership and fight for the public option.

  I'm a campaigner for the Progressive Change Campaign Committee. This entry is cross posted at the BoldProgressive blog. 

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Well, to be fair, I wonder if Bennet would be doing this (0.00 / 0)
if he wasn't facing a primary challenge. (Though, I have no idea if Romanoff is challenging him specifically from the left, or to what extent he's talking about the public option.)

But yeah, this article is totally asinine.  I love how it totally ignores the public option's approval numbers and only talks about the bills' overall popularity.  Also, that "the public option was dropped because many Democrats were wary of it and what it might do to private insurance."  I guess 4 Democrats count as "many" to these people.


re: tea baggers (0.00 / 0)
Ah yes, the 33% of Americans that support the Tea Parties. As pointed out by Matthew Yglesias, "that is less than the 38 percent of Americans have a favorable view of Cuba and 36 percent are favorably disposed toward socialism."

pro-socialists more than the tea-baggers you say?

I wonder who of the two hasn't been covered by the media...


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox