Iowa Likely On January 3rd

by: Chris Bowers

Mon Oct 08, 2007 at 11:25


Iowa is close to picking a date:

State Republican leaders met via conference call last Friday night and agreed to "recommend" Jan. 3rd as their caucus date. Democrats have not picked a date yet, but Democratic sources say that -- contrary to rumors flying around last week -- the two parties are unlikely to split their caucuses over two different nights. So there ya have it folks, Iowa will be Jan. 3 (probably announced the week of Oct. 15 in a bipartisan way if it gets negotiated in time). It may have been necessary for Iowa to hurry up and grab a date before New Hampshire's Bill Gardner decided to snatch either the 3rd or the 5th. Now, N.H. either goes the 8th or leapfrogs to December.

While not a done deal, this is also not a huge surprise. by moving to January 15th, Michigan had put Iowa and New Hampshire in a real bind. A December caucus would have been a joke with a shadow of its traditional influence on the campaign. Now, the most likely calendar is as follows:

  • Thursday, January 3rd: Iowa
  • Tuesday, January 8th: New Hampshire
  • Tuesday, January 15th: Michigan
  • Saturday, January 19th: South Carolina, Nevada
  • Tuesday, January 29th: Florida
  • Tuesday, February 5th: Super Tuesday

If this is the calendar, the question is whether Iowa will still have the same impact it traditionally has on both New Hampshire and national polls.

On the one hand, in 2004, Kerry peaked in New Hampshire on January 24th, five days after the caucus. At that point, his average poll advantage on Dean rose to 15.4%, from a Sunday, January 18th, caucus eve average of Dean +10.7%. In 2000, Bush had basically no Iowa bump, moving from a deficit of 5.8% to McCain in New Hampshire on the eve of the caucus, to just 4.6% three days after the caucus. Gore's post Iowa bump had also hit its peak about three to five days after the caucus. So, having only five days between Iowa and New Hampshire could actually increase New Hampshire's impact on Iowa, as recent Iowa bumps had reached their peak, and begun to dissipate, within five days of the Iowa result.

On the other hand, it is important to remember that post-Iowa bumps are basically caused by a massive wave of positive, free media for the winning candidate. However, with a shorter window between Iowa and New Hampshire, the amount of free media time given to  the Iowa winner will be restricted to, at most, the Friday, Saturday and Sunday morning following the caucus. By Sunday morning, the media will have moved on, and begun to focus on New Hampshire. Also, with both Democrats and Republicans holding contested caucuses, the amount of free media available to the winner will be smaller than in 2004. Keep in mind that the largest Iowa and New Hampshire bounces in history  occurred in 1984, 1996, and 2004, the three cycles when only one party had a competitive campaign. By way of contrast, the most wide open primary season in the last three decades, 1988, saw the third place finishers in Iowa on both sides go on to win New Hampshire eight days later.

My guess is that the bounces the Iowa winners receive will be smaller than 1984, 1996, and 2004, but larger than 1988. On the Democratic side, it means that Edwards and Obama both have a chance at New Hampshire, but they will have to win Iowa and pull a little closer in New Hampshire before Iowa to pull it off.  On the Republican side, it means that Romney probably won't score a knockout blow with a double win in Iowa and New Hampshire, which will set up South Carolina on January 19th as a huge, three-way showdown for the nomination between Giuliani, Romney and Thompson. This also means that it is entirely possible Democrats will know our nominee by January 9th, or possible even January 4th. If Clinton wins either Iowa or New Hampshire, the campaign is probably over.

Oh, and I should add that there are only 87 days and a few hours between now and the start of the Iowa caucuses. Many of those days are holidays. Overall, there is less than twelve weeks of campaign time between now and Iowa. In 2004 terms, today would be the equivalent of October 24th, five full weeks after Clark had already entered the campaign. It is getting late.

Chris Bowers :: Iowa Likely On January 3rd

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
If Hillary wins Iowa it will be over on that night (0.00 / 0)
If Romney takes Iowa and New Hampshire I think it will pretty much be over because he will win Michigan on his family roots and his religion gives him an advantage in Nevada. I don't see how Giuliani even gets to his firewall in Florida without it and February 5th already being set as Romney versus a South Carolina winning Fred Thompson.

without a big win for anyone in Iowa, then it drags on past 2/5 (0.00 / 0)
So here's the Feb 5th firehose; Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Missouri, New Mexico Democrats, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Utah and West Virginia Republicans.
February 5, a date eventually re-christened Super Duper Tuesday: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado,
Connecticut, Georgia, Idaho Democrats, Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, and Tennessee
Kansas, and Oregon.

I look at it a little different.
If Hillary or Obama wins big in Iowa then, yeah, that could propel them into an eviable position.  If Edwards wins big, it gives him alot of mojo that he will have to carefully parlay into solid 2nd place or even wins in NH, MI and NV.  but, If one of the top 3 only take a slim win in Iowa, then I think NH opens up quickly and could also prove a turning point for any of the 3.  That in turn, I believe would lead to a brutal state by state battle for delegates.  Where decisions in the states above could scramble the delegate count and not provide a decisive winner on Feb6th. 
Add in an attack on Iran, and as Clinton's Iowa questioner highlighted, her vote could prove diasterous for her campaign. 
But, again, I go back to my feeling that I feel Clinton is peaking too early.  Her campaign is now under the counter force/pressure that it can not fail.  They have to navigate and manage a big win in Iowa without overdoing to the point that they squeak by and then look like losers.
Clinton may have the money but they also seem forced to spend alot of that money, they are disiplined but have a high burn rate, and they know it.  I suspect that Hillary is striving for a knockout in Iowa to avoid a bruising battle all the way to the convention. 
Although, I am envious of Clinton's poll numbers being an Edwards supporter, they also seem to carry a top heavy burden and danger.  For now, I feel like people are siding with Hillary because they are longing for a Clinton repeat, while they are not getting Bill, they are getting pretty darn close and things were pretty darn good under Bill.  Although, you could argue that Hoover would look good against Bush. 
As we go into this last 100 days to Iowa, I think the divisions in the Democratic party will continue to sharpen.  And individual Democratic voters in and outside of Iowa will start to decide whether they want to repeat the calculating politics of the 90's which did have some great successes.  Or will they sense an urgent need for dynamic progressive change to arrest the diasterous policies of the past dozen years and leap forward to an aggressive challenge of status quo politics.
So that's my gut feeling and I'm sticking to it with 100 days out. 


I've Posted Before (4.00 / 1)
that I don't think there will not be a huge advantage for the Iowa winner because of the compression of the primaries and the new found independence and desired relevance of the states that moved up their dates.

But...

I think Clinton will take 5 of the 6 in January and it will be over before Super Tuesday. 5 of the 6 will give her the momentum to run the table.


[ Parent ]
Someone needs to remind us (0.00 / 0)
... exactly where Howard Dean was in the polls and the money chase in DECEMBER, 2003 (as opposed to October) right after the SEIU and Gore endorsements.

There. Everyone feel better? Very very few Democrats in ANY of these states have really focused in. Support for all three of the front-runners is based on millimeter-deep impressions (Clinton is the Clinton years again and the first woman with a real shot, Obama is exciting and young, Edwards is aggressive and idealistic and takes no crap). It will start moving as we approach Christmas, and then really start swaying around the last week in December.

The trends and factors that will decide this race are not yet visible. Trust me.


Nevada (0.00 / 0)
I seriously doubt Nevada will stay at Jan. 19th. Originally, it was slated to be in the second spot - after Iowa and before New Hampshire. With both of them moving up and Michigan actually moving ahead of Nevada, speculation goes that it will not try to reclaim the number two spot ahead of NH but NV Dems will try to be at least number three. Because NV is holding a caucus and wants as much participation as possible it would have to be held on a weekend. Most likely new date: January 12th.

My Silver State - Nevada's Progressive Community Blog

this seems like ego (0.00 / 0)
masquerading as progressivism. how exactly does this 'increase' participation rather than decrease it being so close to the holidays? if ego weren' a part of this or sloganeering those are the kinds of questions one would be asking

[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox