Senate Forecast Update, March 11th

by: Chris Bowers

Thu Mar 11, 2010 at 18:09


Senate Forecast update
  • March 11th update: Democratic loss of 7.33 seats
  • Change from March 1st: Democrats up 0.02 seats
  • Projected 2010 Senate: Democrats 52-48 (assuming no caucus switches)

Senate forecast overview
Dems* GOP
Not up for election 41 23
Currently safe 8 12
Sub-total 49 35
Current polling 2.67 13.33
Projected total 52 48
* = Because they caucus with Senate Democrats, Independents Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman are considered Democrats

The 16 Senate seats that might switch partisan control
Republicans would have to win all 16 of these campaigns to take control of the Senate
(Campaigns where incumbent party currently leads by 18.5% or more are considered "safe," and not listed)
Democrats: 2.67 (3)
Republicans: 13.33 (13)

State Democrat Republican Margin Current Dem Win %
Wisconsin Feingold Wall D 7.5 97%
California Boxer Campbell D 5.2 94%
Illinois Giannoulis Kirk Even 50%
Ohio Fisher Portman R 4.0 11%
Missouri Carnahan Blunt* R 6.3 4%
Pennnsylvania Specter Toomey R 7.2 3%
Indiana Ellsworth Coats R 7.5 3%
New Hampshire Hodes* Ayotte R 8.4 2%
Colorado Bennet Norton R 8.5 2%
Nevada Reid Tarkanian R 9.4 1%
Arkansas Lincoln Baker R 10.8 0%
North Carolina Marshall Burr R 10.8 0%
Florida Meek Rubio R 12.6 0%
Kentucky Mongiardo Paul R 14.0 0%
Delaware Coons Castle R 22.3 0%
North Dakota Potter Hoeven R 54.0 0%
In an attempt to make the Senate forecast a little easier on the eyes, I have produced a chart showing the polling averages only for the current frontrunners for the Democratic and Republican nominations.  The full chart, which includes all of the primary campaigns and potential general election matchups, can be found in the extended entry.  the methodology and notes to these charts can be found there, too

As disastrous as this looks, it is still possible for Democrats to have a more effective Senate majority in 2011 than they have right now.  With filibuster reform pending, a 52-seat Democratic majority might actually be stronger than the current 59-seat incarnation.  If the Democratic electoral situation improves, which could happen if the jobless rate declines and if Rasmussen polls become a smaller percentage of the averages, Democrats could keep a 54 or 55 seat majority.  If combined with filibuster reform, a majority of that size would make Mary Lanrieu, Ben Nelson, and Joe Lieberman irrelevant.

There is still hope for change yet.  More info in the extended entry.

Chris Bowers :: Senate Forecast Update, March 11th
Full 2010 Senate Chart
State Democrat Republican Margin Current Dem Win %
Wisconsin Feingold Wall D 7.5 97%
WI Feingold Westlake D 12.5 100%
California Boxer Campbell D 5.2 94%
CA Boxer Fiorina D 7.8 97%
CA R Primary Campbell +9.5
Illinois Giannoulis Kirk Even 50%
Ohio Fisher Portman* R 4.0 11%
OH Brunner Portman* R 4.6 9%
OH D Primary Fisher +5.5
Missouri Carnahan Blunt* R 6.3 4%
Pennnsylvania Specter Toomey R 7.2 3%
PA Sestak Toomey R 11.8 0%
PA D Primary Specter +18.4
Indiana Ellsworth Coats R 7.5 3%
Indiana Ellsworth Stutzman R 10.0 0%
Indiana Ellsworth Hostettler R 12.5 0%
New Hampshire Hodes* Ayotte R 8.4 2%
NH Hodes* Lamontagne D 7.2 97%
NH R Primary Ayotte +20.5
Colorado Bennet Norton* R 8.5 2%
CO Romanoff Norton* R 5.8 6%
CO D Primary Bennet +14.0
Nevada Reid Tarkanian R 9.4 1%
NV Reid Lowden R 9.7 1%
NV Reid Angle R 4.0 11%
NV R Primary Tarkanian +0.5
Arkansas Lincoln Baker R 10.8 0%
AR Lincoln Coleman R 5.7 6%
AR Lincoln Boozman R 17.0 0%
AR Halter Coleman R 4.0 11%
AR Halter Baker R 7.5 3%
AR Halter Boozeman R 19.0 0%
AR D Primary Lincoln +16.0
AR R Primary Baker +2.0 (straw poll)
North Carolina Marshall Burr R 10.8 0%
NC Cunningham Burr R 14.8 0%
NC Lewis Burr R 12.5 0%
NC D Primary Marshall +13.5
Florida Meek* Rubio R 12.6 0%
FL Meek* Crist R 14.8 0%
FL R Primary Rubio +17.2
Kentucky Mongiardo Paul R 14.0 0%
KY Conway Grayson R 11.0 0%
KY Conway Paul R 12.0 0%
KY Mongiardo Grayson R 13.5 0%
KY D Primary Mongiardo +7.0
KY R Primary Paul +17.0
Delaware Coons Castle* R 22.3 0%
North Dakota Potter Hoeven R 54.0 0%
* = Faces primary challenge, but heavy favorite
** = Faces primary, but no current polling on primary challengers
.

Also note:

Please let me know how you think the forecast could be improved.  It remains a work in progress.  The methodology can be found here.


Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Can't help but notice Reid's vulnerability. (0.00 / 0)
Should he be defeated, who might the favorites to become majority leader be, and how much of a role would seniority play?

In short, could this be a good thing for progressive Democrats? Or maybe even a very good thing?


Great work as always, but... (0.00 / 0)
...Democratic electoral chances have nothing to do with Rasmussen polls becoming a smaller percentage of the averages (I'm sure you didn't mean it the way I'm reading it).  Either Ras is cooking the books or he isn't.  Kos seems pretty convinced he is.  I use to agree with that sentiment quite strongly, but since the VA and NJ gov races and the MA senate race, I'm not so sure.  Ras did quite well in those races.  Anyway, if Ras polls continue to be relatively large outliers, plus they continue to be plentiful enough to significantly skew the averages, and he is cooking the books, this will affect your prediction model (it should perform quite poorly come November), but it won't have any effect on Democratic electoral chances.  And you won't be the only prognosticator with a poorly performing model.  Pollster, RCP, 538, etc. should all perform poorly.  To some degree all of these methods would be affected by a deluge of crappy (fixed) polls.  

My guess is Ras eventually gets it right.  He seemed scared sh*tless before the MA senate election.  Didn't put out a poll for about a week before the election (very unlike him), went on the teevee (Fox I think) hedging his bets (saying both sides could conceivably win) so he'd look okay whatever happened (when he could have continued course and came down strong for Brown thus looking much better).  He really didn't seem comfortable with his own polls.  But that was just one race, it was a special election which are difficult to poll, and there weren't a ton of polls from the standard reliable players.  I just don't see September and October rolling around, PPP, SUSA, R2000, MD, etc. all putting out polls saying one thing and Ras putting out polls saying something completely different.  If he is wrong it would be terrible for his business.  And no matter how much he wants the Rs to win (which I'm convince of), I'm sure he wants to be taken seriously at this job much more.  Being painted a partisan hack pollster would be a financial disaster for him.  IMHO, this is why he uncharacteristically stayed on the sidelines the final week of the MA senate election.  He didn't want to come out hard for the R, even though his polling model was telling him to, because being labeled a partisan pollster isn't good for business.  

I believe Dem electoral chances aren't as bad as the models are showing right now.  I think Ras is putting out polls to sway public opinion (and it is working - he is single handedly propping up R numbers in every prediction model out there), and he will hit the reality switch around late summer when the other pollsters start ramping up efforts (and showing Ras winter/spring polls are wrong).  All prediction models out there, including yours, will show an upswing in Dem support.  How much of that will be due to voters truly being more inclined to vote Dem (because of HCR passing, employment improving, etc.) and how much of that will be from Ras no longer being willing to risk his reputation for the sake of swaying public opinion toward his team?  We'll never know (assuming I'm correct, which is a large assumption:).  Of course I could be completely wrong, Ras could be right and an R tsunami could be upon us.    I hope I'm right.  

Anyway, love the forecasts.  


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox