Voter ID is "a Lot to Have to Go Through for a Constitutional Right," says Indiana Judge

by: project vote

Thu Mar 11, 2010 at 19:47


Although the 2008 presidential election showed unprecedented increases in turnout from underrepresented citizens, their rates of voter registration and participation were still well behind the electorate in general. As we approach election season, this pattern may only continue. Instead of taking steps to improve the administration of elections to encourage and facilitate voter participation from eligible citizens, lawmakers and elected officials are back to raising barriers to voting by implementing strict voter ID laws, as illustrated through high profile court battles, ballot initiatives, and fast-moving legislation

An appeal to an Indiana's court's decision to shut down the state's notorious voter ID law as unconstitutional was heard last week in the state Supreme Court.

project vote :: Voter ID is "a Lot to Have to Go Through for a Constitutional Right," says Indiana Judge
"That's a lot to have to go through for a constitutional right," said Supreme Court Justice Frank Sullivan Jr. on the struggles to obtain "birth certificates or other documentation in other states to get a state ID or driver's license here," according to Niki Kelly of the Journal Gazette.

While state attorney Thomas Fisher complained that there are "only a handful of anecdotal cases" that prove how voter ID denies citizens the right to vote, "Sullivan pointed out...that the only documented cases of voter fraud he is aware of are absentee ballots 'and yet no one has to show ID to get an absentee ballot or cast one.'"
An imminent battle over voter ID has also been confirmed in Mississippi. Tuesday, Mississippi Secretary of State Delbert Hosemann said that voter ID will be on the state ballot in 2011, according to Elizabeth Crisp of the Mississippi Clarion-Ledger. Hosemann, a supporter of voter ID bills that have been subject to partisan battles in the legislature over the last decade, said the state Republican Party had collected some 131,678 signatures in favor of the initiative.

"Those in favor of requiring voters to show identification at the polls long have argued that it would help deter fraud, while opponents said it could create intimidation for and decrease turnout among older black voters who once were subjected to Jim Crow laws," writes Crisp. In 2009, a voter ID initiative gained support from typically resistant Democratic legislators after the addition of an early voting provision. State Republicans, who did not favor the early voting amendment, killed the bill.

Texas, another state that has long fought over voter ID along party lines, may expect the battle to continue in 2011, according to the Dallas Morning News, which says that state Republicans selected voter ID as a resolution in their primary last week. And three states, South  Carolina, Idaho, and Rhode Island, have pending photo voter ID bills in their state legislatures.

The League of Women Voters, who challenged the Indiana law in League of Women Voters v Rokita, say voter ID "crosses a line" because it creates "an additional qualification to vote rather than a regulation on voting." The inevitable result of such laws, voting rights advocates maintain, is the disenfranchisement of thousands of eligible Americans.

"There is a whole group of folks out there effectively being denied the right to vote," Supreme Court Justice Robert Rucker said. "How does that inspire confidence?"


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
not sure (0.00 / 0)
what the issue is here.  can someone please explain why there is actually a nationwide argument as to whether or people should have an ID to vote.  Yes...voting is a right.  however, verifying that you are eligible to vote is part of the process.  The law states that you have to be a US Citizen to vote.  Common sense states that you verify citizenship before letting someone vote.  What is the issue.  What is the big deal with people having an ID when they show up to vote.  I just don't get it.  

If its a matter of affordability, I am sure the states can set up a fund to help those who can't afford an ID.  


It's a barrier (4.00 / 1)
Verifying eligibility is what happens when you register to vote. That's when the whole citizenship, etc., thing gets vetted.

There is absolutely no reason for someone to be required to show a government issued ID or anything other than proof of address (a power bill or something) at the polling place. Instead, what it does is put a barrier to voting on the citizen.

Given that "fraud" ranges on the order of 100 incidents nationwide per national election (yeah, two per state), this is a fix for a problem that doesn't exist. Is there any doubt in your mind that more people would be unable to vote because of the ID issue than might fraudulently vote without the ID requirement?

No, one simply doesn't need to have a picture ID to vote. I usually have my voter reg card with me, but I've never needed it. It's handy in case the preprinted roster has a mistake but I've only heard about one incident like that in the past 5 years (in our precinct).

That's what this is about. It's an artificial barrier that accomplishes nothing except reducing the ease of voting for some (admittedly small) percentage of the citizenry. And it's unneeded, so why do it?

Karl in Drexel Hill, PA


[ Parent ]
thanks (0.00 / 0)
for the clarrification. however, I have to dissagree.  anyone can show up with a phone or electric bill.  how does the voting attendant know its them?  This issue is to veryfy someones identification along with eligibility.  What your response tells me is that someone can steal my electric bill from my mailbox and use it to vote.  Agreeing with you that the chances of this occurring are very little, I still believe that an identification makes it easier for everyone...the voter and the voting attendant.  Also, though I don't have any studies or numbers, I have to believe that the majority of citizens who registered to vote would actually have an ID.

[ Parent ]
Does it cost money to get a government-issued ID? (0.00 / 0)
Then requiring one functions as a de facto poll tax of sorts.  I would much rather have a government-funded national ID card that automatically registers you to vote if you are a citizen.

Things You Don't Talk About in Polite Company: Religion, Politics, the Occasional Intersection of Both

[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox