Blogswarm: it's time to move ENDA

by: Adam Bink

Thu Mar 18, 2010 at 11:30


Today, OpenLeft is participating in a blogswarm today with Daily Kos, Towleroad, Pam's House Blend, The Bilerico Project, Joe My God, Michelangelo Signorile, David Mixner, Daily Gotham, Culture Kitchen, Taylor Marsh, PageOneQ, Dan Savage, and others.

We're asking folks to contact Speaker Nancy Pelosi at 202-225-4965 and ask that she move the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (HR 3017) to a floor vote.

Dr. Jillian Weiss over at The Bilerico Project explains:

The Employment Non-Discrimination Act, first introduced in 1994, would prohibit job discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people.  But LGBT people have never been able to achieve the enactment of the bill, known by the acronym of "ENDA".

Last year, the Administration's highest ranking gay official, Office of Personnel Management Director John Berry, indicated that ENDA was highest priority on the LGBT civil rights agenda.

"If we can get ENDA enacted and signed into law, it is only a matter of time before all the rest happens," he said. "It is the keystone that holds up the whole bunch, and so we need to focus our energies and attention there."

Hearings were held in the House and in the Senate to demonstrate the need for the bill, and testimony was heard on the severe unemployment, underemployment and harassment experienced by LGBT workers. Witnesses testified to the scientific studies demonstrating this.

The reason that workers need this protection is that the LGBT community is a relatively small minority, estimated around 5% of the U.S. population, and prejudice is common, particularly in more conservative states.

She's right. 30 states do not have employment protections based on sexual orientation, and 38 states do not have employment protections based on gender identity. That's over half the Union. As Pam Spaulding wrote from North Carolina this morning:

Here in North Carolina, if you do not work for a private company or organization that has its own inclusive non-discrimination policy, you can be fired by your employer simply for being LGBT. All a homophobic supervisor has to say is the equivalent of "I hate fags, and don't want to work with one" and out you go - no questions asked, no recourse of any kind.

The bottom line is this state's legislature has not shown it believes tax-paying, productive LGBTs deserve the same rights as other North Carolinians. Employment protections will happen at the federal level before our General Assembly will move to consider legislation of this kind.

This is a federal law- like the hate crimes law President Obama signed last year- that would apply universally.

Various sponsors promised that the bill would move to a vote in August, September, October, and November of 2009. But in order to go to a vote, the bill had to pass through the House Committee on Education and Labor. Markup was finally scheduled for November 18, 2009. At the last minute, the markup was postponed, and has still not been rescheduled.

As I wrote last year, Speaker Pelosi publicly told Democrats that she would not move controversial bills until the Senate went first.  Meanwhile, the House Committee has stated its readiness to move, but is waiting for movement from the Speaker. That movement has not come.  Meanwhile, LGBT Americans continue to suffer discrimination and harassment with no recourse. Some might say to wait until the health care is finished, but reconciliation is still going to take up time and attention over the next month, and there isn't much time left in the legislative calendar. There's can't be any more "wait".

There is a majority in both Houses of Congress in favor of ENDA. The likelihood that progressives will be able to get anything done after the 2010 elections on issues like ENDA is rapidly diminishing. We need a vote, and we need it soon.

Please join with OpenLeft and other blogs in asking that gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people be protected from job discrimination.

Please call Speaker Nancy Pelosi at 202-225-4965.  Ask that the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, HR 3017, move to a vote.

Please be polite, but firm.

After you call, please tell us how the call went by clicking here. If you get a busy signal or hang up, let us know that too.

Thanks for helping move this critical piece of legislation.

Adam Bink :: Blogswarm: it's time to move ENDA

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
As much as I want to see ENDA passed (0.00 / 0)
don't you think Pelosi has enough to do until Sunday???

Why push the calls today, of all days?  Why not Monday?


You beat me to it (0.00 / 0)
Seems like a big waste of energy to do it now.  She's a little tied up at the moment...lol.

[ Parent ]
Two things (4.00 / 1)
First, having been on the Hill, I can tell you her staff assistants and interns are answering calls, and she will likely get a brief report on how many people called on what issue with what position. It's not like we're calling her personal cell phone.

Second, health care will soak time for a very long time. Things are indeed busy, but given the timeline, there is no more "wait another day".


Me on Facebook
Me on Twitter


[ Parent ]
Why would we accept this? (0.00 / 0)
"The likelihood that progressives will be able to get anything done after the 2010 elections on issues like ENDA is rapidly diminishing. We need a vote, and we need it soon."

Are a lot of progressive Senators going to be defeated in November? At last check the ones in serious trouble are the Blue-Dogs.

Harry Reid hasn't exactly been champing at the bit on this issue now. And add Blanche Lincoln, AR, Evan Bayh, IN, Byron Dorgan, ND as the seats Democrats are certain to lose in November and it's a Blue-Dog slaughtering pen!

The only real progressives who could lose in November are:

1. DE -- open seat and sure Democratic loss. That one hurts.
2. CO -- Bennett has been a moderate until he suddenly decided he had a primary challenge. He might not survive Andrew Romanoff. This is a close race and if it loses that's another vote lost. (Perhaps).

But the Democrats might pick up a seat in OH and another in MO if they get some breaks and the candidates campaign well between now and November.

Then in 2011, assuming Democrats still have a majority, they are going to have to get rid of the filibuster because Reps aren't going to agree to ANYTHING Obama wants to do, no matter what it is and they will only be emboldened by victory.

If throwing a temper-tantrum and saying "NO!" to everything brought them 5-7 seats why would they stop being assholes?

The Senate has passed the breaking point with Republican obstructionism and they're going to have to have majority rule in some fashion to get a single bill passed -- even the budget!

With majority rule anything progressives want to pass will be MORE likely than it is now where 40 votes will block it.  


I forgot to mention Specter! (0.00 / 0)
Arlen Specter PA is not exactly a wild-eyed liberal. He's a party-switcher who will go back to being a moderate Republican in Democrat's clothing if he wins in November.

He certainly isn't going to want to take a controversial vote for ENDA right now!


[ Parent ]
Focusing on the wrong yardstick (4.00 / 1)
I have found that on ENDA, assuming "progressives" are going to be the only ones for it is incorrect. Several liberal Republicans are for ENDA, as are a number of more conservative Democrats like Specter. So pointing to how relatively few progressives are going to lose (far from certain, by the way) in November is the wrong yardstick. If Chris' Senate forecast comes true and there are 52 Democrats in 2011, along with extremely likely ENDA opponents in the form of Democrats like Ellsworth, there will be virtually no shot absent filibuster reform. Thus, the reason to push for it now.


Me on Facebook
Me on Twitter


[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox