Boccieri to switch to "yes"; now "no to yes" votes lagging 4 behind "yes to no"

by: Chris Bowers

Fri Mar 19, 2010 at 11:00


Representative John Boccieri just announced at a press conference that he will vote "yes" on the health reform bill.  This is significant, because Boccieri voted "no" back in November.

He becomes the fourth confirmed "no to yes" vote.  However, there are still eight "yes to no" votes, meaning the leadership still needs at least another three Representatives who voted "no" in November.  Here is the running tally:

  1. 8 confirmed "Yes to No" votes: Arcuri, Cao, Costello, Donnelly, Driehaus, Lipinski, Lynch, Stupak

    (Note: even if he is undecided, Cao will never cast the deciding vote in favor.  As such, he should be considered a "Yes to No" for the duration of the vote count)

  2. 4 confirmed "No to Yes" votes: Boccieri, Gordon, Kucinich, Markey

  3. The results in a net of four votes for "Yes to No." That means the leadership needs to pick up three more "no" votes from November to pass the bill
While Boccieri is a step forward, Peter DeFazio has emerged this morning as another November "yes" vote who could flip to "no" this time around.

Rep. Pete Defazio tells @ryangrim he's a NO unless they re-insert geo. disparity fix for Medicare http://bit.ly/dt1rog

What a slog.  One step forward, one step back, lots of Reps looking to get in the headlines by saying they are undecided or about to announce their vote.

Chris Bowers :: Boccieri to switch to "yes"; now "no to yes" votes lagging 4 behind "yes to no"

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
It seems to me that (0.00 / 0)
passage is no longer in doubt--it'll pass.

What's in doubt is who will be allowed to vote no.  


Tom Hayden says Kucinich avoided being "the Nader of health care." (0.00 / 0)
Dennis Kucinich did the right thing by indicating he will vote for the health care legislation. If his "no" vote were to be the difference in the bill's failure, millions of people never would have forgiven him. He would be known, rightly or wrongly, as the Ralph Nader of health care.

History hangs strangely sometimes on one person's vote. The failure of the current legislation would be a disaster for the Obama presidency, the Democratic Congress, and the progressive left as a whole. On the morning after, there would be nothing but recrimination on the left coupled with triumphalism on the right.




--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


;link sorry (0.00 / 0)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
Who are we looking for? Titus is in. (4.00 / 1)
Rep. Dina Titus (D-Nev.) released a statement on Friday saying that she would support the health care bill even though it "is not perfect."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox