Patience wearing thin

by: Adam Bink

Mon May 03, 2010 at 16:23


I took a stroll down to the rally to repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell in front of the White House yesterday. Although smaller than expected (likely due to a 90 degree steam room that was the weather yesterday), I came away from it with one memory: the palpable anger you can see in online communities has bubbled offline. It's real, and it's there. I think if there was a call to March on Washington, more than a couple hundred thousand (the turnout at last fall's March) would come out.

Speaker after speaker took the bullhorn and shouted- literally, shouted- at this White House. Sometimes at political rallies you hear "Mr. President, let's work with you to do X" or "The President has made this a priority and we need to get his back!" Not at this rally. It was "Mr. President, lead or get the hell out of the way!" "When I was in basic training, the last time I checked on that organizational chart, the Commander in Chief ranks above the Secretary of Defense. So where is our Commander in Chief?" and chants of "No money, no votes". Even former Gov. Dean showed up after being asked to earlier in the morning to speak.

The rally ended with six activists chaining themselves to the fence while supporters shouted "shame!" at the White House. I am not kidding or exaggerating when I say the tone of the rhetoric is something you might have heard at a teabagger rally.

The speech I remember the most was from Alex Nicholson, a former servicemember involuntarily outed, who is executive director of Servicemembers United:


h/t to Aravosis for the video

The anger on Alex's face is what everyone was feeling that day, and what millions more are feeling online. It's a feeling that this President is under the influence of what Joe Sudbay calls "political homophobia"- politicians who say they'll vote for you and support you but are scared- thus, phobia- when it comes time to get it done. And I'm telling you, from the exasperation and feeling of being pissed-off beyond belief yesterday, there will be a lot of LGBT activists who will stay home in November to punish the President- and telling their straight friends and family to do so, too, if this Administration and Democrats in Congress do not do right by them. I'm not saying this to make idle threats- I'm just the messenger here. Anyone can go read it online or see it in person. It's real and it's growing.

This administration dealt Don't Ask, Don't Tell repeal a serious blow on Friday. Now the President has, like Alex says, until May 24th- the week of markup in the Senate Armed Services Committee- to insert repeal language in the defense authorization bill. This is something advocates have been calling for for months. It's not in conflict with the Secretary of Defense's recommendations- like I wrote on Friday, the Administration's position that repeal should be done after the review avoids the issue. You can set an end date and delay the implementation. The Administration needs to take a position on that, too.

The patience out there is wearing thin. When you go to an LGBT rally and the tone of the rhetoric sounds like a teabagger protest, that's a serious problem. It's one this Administration shouldn't take lightly.

Adam Bink :: Patience wearing thin

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I'm glad patience is wearing thin. (4.00 / 2)
There's absolutely no reason for the WH to take anyone seriously who isn't at least willing to call them out in a decisive manner. When people are willing to impose real political costs on someone, that's the moment they will be heard. Maybe after some delay....

To be blunt about this though, I'm not expecting Obama to budge very much on this, or any other Democratic Base issue. Fact is, he's made his political bed, so to speak, with the same crowd we all voted out of office in '08.

After all, this is the same guy that just made a "joke" about offing civilians in far away places for the purpose of "entertainment" the other night--not literally, of course, but I'm sure folks in Asia sure got the gist of that one, eh? This is a guy who thinks destroying the social safety net is "good for the economy"--like in what universe? This is a guy who is opposed to equality, civil rights, human rights and the rule of law. I could go on ad nauseum, of course!

So it's good the patience is wearing off. Perhaps in another year or so, the LGBT crowd will be willing to make their point in more decisive terms. Perhaps progressives more generally will too. Perhaps.

Just keep in mind we're dealing with a person of deeply Straussian qualities, who is actually quite opposed to what most of us want. He's on the other side and making him rethink that will require threatening electoral doom for his administration.

They're banking on all of us not doing that. That's why the hubris flows so freely...

"More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly." -Woody Allen, My Speech to the Graduates


I'm Glad To Hear This (4.00 / 5)
Obama has failed deliver on virtually every front, but the anger needed to start bringing serious pressure to bear to change this dynamic has been seriously lacking.

Someone had to lead the way on changing this.  And it had to happen sometime.

This is not "just" about GLBT rights--and not "just" because the rights of one are the rights of all.  This is about doing what it takes to make Obama keep faith with his supporters across the board.  If he won't do so voluntarily, then it's damn well time to force him.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


You shouldn't compare LGBT activists (4.00 / 3)
to teabaggers. Their grievances are real.

Montani semper liberi

More a comparison (0.00 / 0)
Of tone and rhetoric than grievances, Sadie.


Me on Facebook
Me on Twitter


[ Parent ]
True But (0.00 / 0)
Their demonstrations of anger are real--irl, not virtual.  And that makes them similar in one important respect.

If we begin to get more and more of this, then we can expect to start seeing some results.


"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
asdf (4.00 / 2)
He blew off unions and EFCA.  He even taxed their members medical benefits to pay for his corporate insurance bill.  No universal health care; and I'll bet you to a dollar to a donut, no real banking reform either.  And let's not forget drill baby drill.   There is so much to be pissed at including no DADT.  

i'll add to the list ... (0.00 / 0)
... no immigration reform and escalation of war in the Middle East.

On my top three issues--LGBT rights, immigration reform, and war in the Middle East--Obama has done very little to distinguish himself from his predecessor.

Let me take that back, Bush actually expended a lot more effort on immigration reform than Obama has.  


[ Parent ]
I was afraid of this (0.00 / 0)
when Obama didn't move more decisively on DADT in 2009. I figured that pushing the issue off to an election year would lead to pushing it off until 2011. If the Republicans take back the House, we'll have no action on this front for a long time. Even if Democrats keep a slim House majority, I wouldn't be optimistic about them repealing DADT after Republicans have made decent gains.

Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.

The excuse in 2011 will be (4.00 / 2)
that the Dems no longer have enough votes due to losses in 2010. Followed with solicitation letters from the Dem organizations along the lines of "Help us elect more Democrats to Congress so we can repeal DADT". Send money to support this effort.

[ Parent ]
I don't really understand (4.00 / 1)
Doesn't polling show that even teabaggers want it repealed? This is a great wedge issue like the flag burning amendment that came up every election year when R's were in charge.

How is it possible for Obama to be that stupid?


He's not stupid (0.00 / 0)
He just hates gay people. It's evident in his face every time the subject comes up, the few times he's met with gay activists, and the fact that his big push for votes from the christian right involved professional homophobes Donnie McLurkin and Rick Warren. This is neither a secret nor a mystery.

That, and he's a coward who will let the Pentagon and Rahm Emanuel tell him what to do.

"My darling girl, when are you going to understand that being normal is not necessarily a virtue? It rather denotes a lack of courage." - Stockard Channing as Aunt Francis Owens, Practical Magic


[ Parent ]
Obama is a creature of the Village (0.00 / 0)
and like the rest of the Village, popular support is only one source of political support - and not the most important.  You can tell this is not just about Obama's personal views because it is not unique to him.  The media also treats DADT repeal as a terribly risky thing to do, just like the public option, raising taxes, etc.

They don't admit it, of course. They keep pretending this is about public opinion, no matter how nonsensical that claim is.

Of course, you are right. DADT would be an unbelievably strong electoral issue for the Dems.  The fact that this claim makes you "unserious" just goes to show how much we ought to discount elite claims like this.

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.


[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox