Wall Street reform, process and amendment updates, May 18th

by: Chris Bowers

Tue May 18, 2010 at 13:58

Update: Dodd makes a deal with Carper to alter his pre-emption amendment a bit, and it just passed, 80-18, with most Democrats voting "yes." Ouch.  A perfect example of Democrats compromising with themselves.


Concurrent with today's primary action, Wall Street reform continues to move forward in the Senate.  Here is the state of play:

Cloture filed, vote tomorrow
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has filed for cloture on the Wall Street reform bill.  The vote will take place tomorrow.

If cloture does succeed, amendments and debate will continue for 30 hours
Even if cloture succeeds tomorrow, the final vote will take place on Thursday evening or Friday morning.  Also, the debate and amendment process will continue.  There will still be 30 hours of debate and amendments, possibly during an all-night session.  The only difference is that the amendments must be ruled to be germane, which might cause problems for amendments such as the ones related to the oil spill, secret holds, and health insurance industry anti-trust exemption.

If cloture does not succeed, there will be a vote a day on it until it does succeed
If Republicans block the bill and cloture is not invoked, then Senate Democrats will employ the same tactics they successfully used to get the bill on the Senate floor: hold a vote on the bill every day, generating negative media coverage for Republicans, until they let it pass.

Corker expects "four or five" Republicans to support
FWIW, Tennessee Republican Bob Corker expects cloture to succeed, with four or five Republican votes:

At least four or five Republicans will break ranks with the GOP to support Democrats' Wall Street reform bill, Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) said Tuesday.

Corker, a key negotiator on the bill to overhaul U.S. financial regulations, said he would not be among those Republicans to support the overall legislation, which has been the subject of debate and amendments in the Senate this month.

"I think that we know that there are probably at least five Republicans who are going to vote for this bill," Corker said during an appearance on CNBC. "I think we've seen that in the voting patterns."

No matter what happens on cloture, amendments continuing today
In the extended entry, I discuss some amendment highlights today.

Chris Bowers :: Wall Street reform, process and amendment updates, May 18th
  1. The Senate will take up the Carper weakening amendment starting at 2:15 pm, eastern.  This amendment strips the authority of state Attorneys General to enforce state laws against large financial instutions, and has some Demcoratic support.  Zach Carter explains:

    Over the past decade, state regulators tried to crack down on subprime outrages, but federal regulators stepped in to protect the megabanks. If we want to establish a fair financial system, we have to empower states to take action against abusive banks.

    That's what makes a new amendment from Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., so dangerous. Carper's plan is to ban states from enforcing their own laws against big national banks like Wells Fargo, Citigroup, and Bank of America. This is an overt attempt to take cops off the beat and allow banks to get away with outright abuses. While doing lipservice to "strong consumer protection," Sens. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., John Ensign, R-Nev., D-Mark Warner, D-Va., Tim Johnson, D-S.D., Ben Nelson, D-Neb., and Evan Bayh, D-Ind., have all gone to bat for America's largest banks.

    This is the kind of amendment that can actually sink the bill if adopted. For years, federal bank regulators at the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) asserted broad powers to preempt state laws, and courts generally backed them. But in 2009, the Supreme Court reversed those decisions, giving states the ability to go after big banks through the court system. Carper's amendment wouldn't just institutionalize a destructive status quo-it would actively deregulate, further empowering banks to take advantage of the public.

    This is a very dangerous amendment.  Read Zach's whole piece for more.

  2. Cantwell joins Dorgan in threatening filibuster if her amendment does not receive a vote: Maria Cantwell (D-WA), who is looking to reinstate Glass-Steagall, has joined Byron Dorgan (D-ND) in threatening a filibuster if her amendment does not receive a vote:

    "Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) has said he will filibuster the bill unless the Senate votes on his amendment banning a speculative financial instrument known as a "naked" credit default swap. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) has done the same, saying she needs a vote on her amendment separating commercial and investment banking operations. Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said any Democratic defections are a cause for concern."

    Progressives are winning a lot of these strengthening amendments, so it would suck it Cantwell and Dorgan are not given their votes.  

  3. Volcker rule whip count.  Another key strengthening amendment is the Merkley Levin amendment to reinstate the Volcker rule.  As a sign of of important this amendment is, opponents may make it face a 60-vote threshold, instead of the 50-vote threshold all but two amendments have faced thus far.  Here is a whip count I have seen on the bill:

    • Democratic No (2): Hagan, Warner

      With two Democratic defections, three Republicans to reach the 60 vote threshold.  One Republican defection has already been secured:

    • Republican Yes (1): Lugar

      Which means two of the following six potential votes are needed:

    • Republican Lean Yes (1): Brown

      Republican Undecided (5): Collins, Snowe, Voinovich, Grassley, McCain

      And, even if we make up enough votes from the Republicans listed above, we have to hold these Democrats, especially the first two:

    • Democratic Leaning No (2): Klobuchar, Ben Nelson

      Democratic Undecided (5): Lieberman, Gillibrand, Schumer, Carper, Byrd

      Democratic Leaning yes (1): Byah

    The keys are the six potential Republican votes undecided and the two Democrats leaning no.  Four of eight Senators will be needed for passage. Even then, the vote would need to be held on a day when all Democrats are available for votes, and all Democratic undecideds would need to be secured.  So, hopefully the vote will come on either Wednesday or Thursday, rather than today.  Otherwise, it will be difficult to reach 60 votes on this one.

Debate and voting restarts at 2:15 pm.  Watch it live on CSPAN2.

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Against US/UK resistance, EU hedge fund regulations pass hurdle (4.00 / 1)
U Hedge Fund Rules Pass First Hurdle

The European Union's finance ministers today give their assent to controversial new rules for hedge funds and private equity firms, despite the opposition of both the U.S. and the U.K.

The rules, which will come into force in 2012 pending their approval by the European Parliament, will impose strict new reporting and custody requirements on alternative investment managers, as well as possible leverage and borrowing restrictions. As adopted by the finance ministers, the directive would also bar foreign hedge fund managers that fail to adhere to the EU's stricter standards.


Take that, "shadow banks"! Once again, the EU leads, while the US and UK try to protect the big gamblers. Shameful.

Does Carper's amendment ... (0.00 / 0)
need 50 or 60 votes to be included? ... because there seem to be .. sadly .. a lot of Senators willing to vote for that POS .. so much for those Republicans and their "states rights" bull crap .. and I just heard that Cantwell and Casey voted for this nonsense .. ugh!!

Dasm!!! .. (4.00 / 1)
the Carper POS just passed 80-18 ... tells you how many people are on the take

[ Parent ]
The amendment was weakened somewhat (0.00 / 0)
The compromise between the two Democrats would give state attorneys general a prominent role in protecting consumers, but bar state AGs from bringing federal lawsuits against national banks, and from going into another state to bring charges against a bank, according to an agreement summary obtained by Reuters.

For example, under the agreement, the California attorney general could not bring claims in Nevada based on new federal consumer protection rules, the summary said.

In addition, the compromise limits the power of federal bank regulators to preempt, or overrule, state consumer protection laws at a level that was established in a 1996 Supreme Court case involving Barnett Bank, the summary said.

[ Parent ]
Carper amd. just passed 80-18 (4.00 / 2)
What a joke!-this is a financial Stupak amendment-a Republican's fantasy that only a democratic majority could enact! Thank you Corpadems.

[ Parent ]

Open Left Campaigns



Advanced Search

Powered by: SoapBlox