Privatizing SCHIP?

by: Matt Stoller

Sat Oct 13, 2007 at 21:19


Here's Bush on SCHIP.

I happen to believe that what you're seeing when you expand eligibility for federal programs is the desire by some in Washington, D.C. to federalize health care. I don't think that's good for the country. I believe in private medicine. I believe in helping poor people-which was the intent of SCHIP, now being expanded beyond its initial intent. I also believe that the federal government should make it easier for people to afford private insurance. I don't want the federal government making decisions for doctors and customers.

Assuming the veto override fails, Bush might offer a deal to substantially increase the amount of money spent on SCHIP, but only if the program is privatized.  The odds aren't great he'd do this, but he does like to do crazy stuff, and throwing 10 million kids off SCHIP puts the our backs against the wall.  And he knows it.

Regardless, it's now worth thinking about what to do if the veto override fails.

Matt Stoller :: Privatizing SCHIP?

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
What to do (4.00 / 2)
Simple: Clinton, Obama and Edwards hold a joint press conference, and jointly pledge that this will be the first bill that one of them will sign as President.

And then publicize the hell out of every sick kid without care due to Repub heartlessness between now and February, 2009.

The veto-upholders (note: not all Repubs) and their misguided ideologue of a Decider will have made this mess; let them stew in it--and run on it.

The compromise here has ALREADY happened.


SCHIP already private. (4.00 / 1)
If I understand it correctly, SCHIP consists of tax money being sent from the Feds to the states, who then disburse it to individual families according to their own state-developed formulas, where the families are then obligated to use the money to buy private insurance.

So I think it's already about as privatized as it can possibly be.  All this tax money ends up in the hands of Blue Cross and Kaiser and the rest already.

While I know CheneyCo are great at coming up with new and more insane ways to privatize things, I don't see what they could possibly do to this particular program to make it even more privatized.

Who knows though, watch them prove me wrong.


Don't health care companies stand to lose if S-CHIP doesn't pass? (0.00 / 0)
Wasn't this a program created by republicans to offer private health insurance to poor families?  Wasn't this a program to highlight alternatives to a government run program?  Doesn't the program simply pay private health insurance payments?  Should the leadership point these out to wavering republicans?  Won't the insurance industry be out $35 billion in payments if this doesn't pass?

crazy irony or not?


Yeah, I'd agree that 'the compromise has already....' (0.00 / 0)
no question.

Here we are spending untold manhours discussing, ruminating and gnashing our teeth over a program that will 'cover' 4m children.

How about the 47 million uninsured, including perhaps those kids parents, of the 301 million who live here?

Oh, nothing for them you say?

If this isn't Kabuki by 'Versailles' then I must be in the wrong theater. This is, in fact,  just another distraction Ol' Mr. Decider has cooked up to waste everybody's time.

Check out John Edwards speech to SEIU here:

http://takeaction.wo...

That's how you get real healthcare reform in this pathetic excuse for a Congress.

You take their's away.

Elect John Edwards and watch the courtiers of 'Versailles' scurry from the halls of Congress like the rats they truly are. For this nation it's change or die time.

Peace, Health and Prosperity for Everyone.


How the President Thinks (4.00 / 1)
When the President said, "I don't want the federal government making decisions for doctors and customers", he showed the mistaken view of Republicans that we are but customers to the medical/pharmasutical industries. Just when did we cease being patients and become sources of revenue?

Shamefully, health care decisions based on a customer's financial status will never be better than decisions based on a patient's needs. Unfortunately we have a President who only sees dollar signs when he looks at the people outside his dangerous circle of associates.

If the President really wanted to do something to improve the general well of our ailing nation he could resign. Barring that. Congress could and should impeach the Bush/Cheney team to stop the spread of cancer that is the Bush administration.


Excellent point (0.00 / 0)
Bush doesn't see people; just dollar signs.  He cannot see the children without healthcare, the military families attending their loved ones funeral, the elderly living in poverty, Iraqi civilians suffering. It's all about money & power, there is not one little cell in his body that contains compassion.

[ Parent ]
While expanding SCHIP should happen... (4.00 / 1)
it is hardly a bold program. It is state-based with all kinds of variances, it excludes legal immigrant children and undocumented children, and it helps fund lousy private insurance companies.

Universal health care would eclipse the need for all these fights. Medicare for all. We should ALWAYS tie in the fight over SCHIP to the need for affordable health care for everyone.


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox