Senate forecast update: Democrats making big gains during primary season

by: Chris Bowers

Thu Jun 03, 2010 at 12:36



June 3rd update: Democrats 53.43 seats
May 28th: Democrats 52.67 seats

While the tea party wave in Republican primaries is dragging down GOP hopes in the 2010 Senate elections, progressive primaries are actually improving Democratic chances.  The net result is that Democrats are making big gains on Republicans during the 2010 primary season.

Since April 14th, Republicans have slid backwards in the general election polling averages in 10 of the 12 states that have featured both competitive primaries and competitive general elections. The average general election loss for Republicans has been significant: 3.7% on the mean, and 4.9% on the median.

Here are the changes in those 12 states.  The April 14th Senate forecast can be seen here, and the current Senate forecasat is in the extended entry of this article:

Change in Republican general election position, Senate campaigns, April 14-current
12 states with competitive primaries and general elections
State Republican loss
Nevada 14.2%
Florida* 10.2%
Iowa 7.0%
North Carolina 6.1%
Pennsylvania 5.2%
California 5.0%
Kentucky 4.7%
Ohio 3.0%
Colorado 2.7%
Arizona** 2.0%
Indiana -5.5%
Arkansas -9.8%
* = Compares mid-April status of Rubio vs Meek general election to current three-way standings
** = For both April and current forecasts, J.D. Hayowrth is considered to be the likely Republican nominee in Arizona, not John McCain

These nearly across the board improvements for Democratss come during a time when Democrats have not improved their standing nationally.  According to Pollster.com, President Obama's net approval rating has dropped by about 2.5% since mid-April, and the national, generic congressional ballot has been stagnant, with perhaps a slight GOP gain.  In other words, Democrats are improving in these states due to local campaign developments, not national trends.

A reasonable conclusion from this is that Republicans are being hurt by their primaries, while Democrats are benefiting from their primaries.  This is as strong as any evidence yet available that the tea party wave in Republican primaries is a decided, net negative for the Republican party..

By contrast, Democrats have seen improvements as a result of their competitive primaries in Kentucky, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and possibly Colorado (although in that case the Democratic improvement is more likely due to Jane Norton's emerging weakness).  The only exception appears to be Arkansas, although Bill Halter's position against John Boozman has only deteriorated by 1.0% over the past two months, if the recent, absurd Rasmussen poll is removed from the averages. Blanche Lincoln's position has entirely collapsed.

The only clear case where Republicans were helped by a primary is in Indiana.  In that state, the Democratic primary was brilliantly cleared by Evan Bayh's late retirement announcement, thereby allowing Republicans to suck up all media attention and get a boost as a result of their competitive primary.  Oh yeah, and two tea party candidates were defeated by the establishment GOP choice in Indiana, too.

The tea party and other right-wing primary efforts are eroding Republican chances in the general election, while progressive efforts are doing exactly the opposite on the Democratic side.  This primary season has been a tremendous help to  Democratic Senate chances.  In fact, without Rasmussen polling, Democrats now lead in enough campaigns to hold 55 seats in the Senate, which is a long way from an electoral disaster.

Complete Senate forecast can be found in the extended entry.

Chris Bowers :: Senate forecast update: Democrats making big gains during primary season
Senate forecast overview, May 28th
Dems GOP
Not up for election 41 23
Incumbent party safe 5 9
Sub-total 46 32
Current polling 7.43 14.57
Projected total 53.43 46.57
Notes: Because they caucus with Senate Democrats, Independents Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman are considered Democrats.  For now, Charlie Crist is considered more likely to caucus with Republicans, and as such is included in the GOP's overall total.

The 22 Senate seats that might switch partisan control
The chart below looks only at a broadly defined definition of "competitive" campaigns.  Campaigns where incumbent party currently leads by 18.5% or more are considered "safe" and not listed.
State Democrat Republican Margin Current Dem Win %
Connecticut Blumenthal McMahon D 16.3 100%
Oregon Wyden Huffman D 13.5 100%
California Boxer Fiorina* D 6.8 97%
Nevada Reid Angle D 4.5 91%
NV Reid Lowden D 0.5 58%
NV Reid Tarkanian D 1.5 72%
NV R Primary Angle +5.3
Washington Murray Rossi* D 2.3 80%
Wisconsin Feingold Johnson* D 2.0 77%
Ohio Fisher Portman D 1.0 67%
Pennnsylvania Sestak Toomey D 0.6 59%
Illinois Giannoulis Kirk R 1.5 28%
Colorado Bennet Norton R 2.0 23%
CO Romanoff Norton R 2.5 20%
CO Bennet Buck R 0.5 30%
CO Romanoff Buck R 1.0 33%
CO D Primary Bennet +10.5
CO R Primary Norton +11.0
Missouri Carnahan Blunt R 4.5 9%
North Carolina Marshall Burr R 4.5 9%
NC Cunningham Burr R 9.0 1%
NC D Primary Marshall +2.5
Arizona Glassman Hayworth R 8.5 2%
AZ Glassman McCain R 21.0 0%
AZ R Primary McCain +12.0
Kentucky Conway Paul R 9.0 1%
Iowa Conlin* Grassley R 11.0 0%
New Hampshire Hodes* Ayotte* R 11.0 0%
South Carolina Rawl DeMint R 13.0 0%
Indiana Ellsworth Coats R 15.5 0%
Arkansas Halter Boozman R 17.8 0%
AR Lincoln Boozeman R 22.3 0%
AR D Primary Halter +2.5
Florida M 17.3 R 32.7 C 33.0 0%
Delaware Coons Castle* R 20.5 0%
North Dakota Potter Hoeven R 47.0 0%

Notes:

  1. The methodology can be found here.

  2. * = Faces primary challenge, but currently either clear favorite or no polling available.

  3. The following polls are used in the above averages are not listed in the various links to Pollster.com and Wikipedia.:
Please let me know how you think the forecast can be improved.  Suggestions are always welcome.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Rasmussen has a new MO poll out today... (4.00 / 1)
Has Carnahan and Blunt pretty much tied (Blunt 45 to Carnahan's 44)...

Just thought you'd like to know!

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


Thanks! (4.00 / 1)
I have updated the chart and numbers accordingly!

[ Parent ]
About Harry.. (4.00 / 2)
Seriously, I'm so disgusted with our corrupted Democratic cronies in the Senate and in the White House I have one interest only this year- getting a new Senate ML equal to that of our ass kicking Pelosi, to help steer Obama back into democratic territory,   or I'm done and will let the tea baggers have their way with the lot of them.

Time we play some serious political hardball.  Tell Reid we'll support him - we do want a Dem in that seat, but only if he steps down as ML, permanently. Otherwise we'll help him lose.
If I don't have some hope that next years Senate will start kicking some Right-wing ass, I just can't and won't watch our party decompose any more.  

Nationalism is not the same thing as terrorism, and an adversary is not the same thing as an enemy.


New R2K poll showing reid beating all opponents... n/t (4.00 / 1)


REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


Once again, thanks and updated! (n/t) (4.00 / 1)


[ Parent ]
Wow, Reid is in the blue! (0.00 / 0)
For the first time in like, forever.

Also, how the hell is Reid doing better than Sestak, Giannoulias and Carnahan?


[ Parent ]
Because now that his opponents are getting some press... (0.00 / 0)
People have started to notice that they're all batshit crazy.  I mean, from what I've heard, Chicken Sue Lowden is the sensible Republican in that primary.

"A fantasy is not even a wish, much less an act.  There is no such thing as a culpable or shameful fantasy."  -----Lady Sally McGee

[ Parent ]
if we end up with 55 Senate seats (4.00 / 1)
that will be a remarkably good showing considering how high unemployment is now.

Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.

Good showing? (4.00 / 1)
I'm in a pissy Dem mood so no offense to you personally.

Unexpected Democratic wins because the other guy is the worse of the two evils is not my idea of a good showing.

By my estimates from the likely winners and the rough final outcome, the Right will grow stronger and harder while the Dems will grow much weaker with less members and gains for the Moderate side, not the Progressive.  
In spite of the party and our platform tanking because Obama avoided leading by playing footsie with the Right, including the 2 SCOTUS nominations, and Reid the Follower doing his donors and/or Rahm's bidding, we'll be looking back at this 111th as the 'good old days'.

Hope next years OL doesn't become the new My DD.  I thought some here headed that way already...

Nationalism is not the same thing as terrorism, and an adversary is not the same thing as an enemy.


[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox