Nomination At A Glance: First Post-Q3 Update

by: Chris Bowers

Tue Oct 16, 2007 at 14:00


Here are the new numbers, including the best latest info on available primary cash. Also, with the primary calendar coming into focus, I have brought back the full table.

All State Polls Taken September 16th through October 9th
Democratic Nomination, At a Glance
State Est. Date # Polls Clinton Obama Edwards Richardson
Net Avail Cash Jun 30 Q2 $32.5M $30.5M $18.0M $5.6M
Iowa Jan 03 4 26.8% 23.8% 21.5% 10.3%
New Hampshire Jan 08 5 41.0% 20.6% 12.0% 8.2%
Nevada Jan 12 2 45.0% 16.0% 11.5% 6.5%
Michigan Jan 15 1 42.0% 26.0% 10.0% 7.0%
South Carolina Jan 19 2 42.0% 30.0% 8.5% 3.5%
Florida Jan 29 4 47.3% 20.0% 10.5% 3.0%
National Feb 05 NA 42.5% 18.4% 10.9% 3.4%

Clinton seems to be pulling away everywhere except Iowa. However, I am willing to bet that as the “inevitable” narrative runs its course, this will result in fiercer media coverage of Clinton, and at least a somewhat tightening of the campaign as it approaches January 3rd. the “inevitable” narrative is actually not very good for her campaign, since it heavily raises expectations making any stumbles, especially in Iowa, potentially more damaging than they were in the past. Still, for anyone to have any chance of winning the nomination except for her, those candidates must defeat her in Iowa. Anyone Clinton finishes ahead of in Iowa is finished.

Republican Nomination, At a Glance
State Est. Date # Polls Romney Giuliani Thompson McCain Hukabee
Net Avail Cash Jun 30 Q2 $9.0M $16.0M $6.5M $-0.1M $0.6M
Iowa Jan 03 5 25.8% 15.6% 15.2% 8.6% 9.8%
New Hampshire Jan 08 6 25.5% 21.3% 10.8% 16.7% 5.2%
Nevada Jan 12 2 23.5% 29.5% 16.0% 10.0% 2.0%
Michigan Jan 15 2 18.0% 21.5% 14.5% 12.5% 5.5%
South Carolina Jan 19 3 19.0% 19.7% 18.3% 14.0% 5.0%
Florida Jan 29 5 13.2% 28.8% 21.6% 9.0% 4.8%
National Feb 05 NA 9.7% 27.5% 17.1% 13.9% 6.2%

I have kept Romney in front, for now, even though Giuliani leads in more states, in national polls, and in available cash. When it comes to the early states, I don’t think Giuliani’s narrow leads against Romney in Michigan, South Carolina and Nevada will hold should Romney win both Iowa and New Hampshire. When it comes to cash, Romney has plenty more of his personal fortune to burn, so he won’t be outspent. When it comes to national polls, if Romney does indeed run the table in Iowa, New Hampshire, Michigan, South Carolina and Nevada, I have little doubt he will move into first both in Florida and nationally. That is simply too much of a momentum wave for Giuliani’s soft, small leads to hold off.

However, it should be noted that Romney’s continuing narrow advantage might be built on a house of cards. So far, he accounts for about 90% of all Republican paid media in this cycle, a number that won’t last much longer. When other candidates start to go on the air, it seems inevitable that his advantage in Iowa and New Hampshire will either shrink, or disappear entirely. If Romney loses either Iowa or New Hampshire, his position might fold almost immediately, and he could drop to third or even fourth place in a state like South Carolina. At that point, the campaign would be Thompson versus Giuliani, with Giuliani favored. So, while Romney remains narrowly in front, Giuliani is right on his heels.

Early state polls can be found here and here. Net available cash means cash on hand for the primaries minus debts owed by the campaigns. The primary calendar is not fixed in stone, but rather is the current best guess. Only candidates with 4.5% or more in most polling averages are included in the chart. Nomination at a glance archives can be found here.
Chris Bowers :: Nomination At A Glance: First Post-Q3 Update

Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Minor Points (4.00 / 1)
I thought Nevada was planning to move to the 12th.

Also on the Republican side, in effect Mitt Romney has $250 million on hand, there's no way he'll leave a penny in the inheritance fund if he needs it to get the nomination.


Link on Nevada? (0.00 / 0)
I wasn't aware of that, but if you could provide me with a link, I'd be glad to see it.

And I'd love to see Romney blow through his entire wad and lose. :)

[ Parent ]
thanks! (0.00 / 0)
I'll update the post to reflect this.

[ Parent ]
Romney's wad (0.00 / 0)
1.  A big chunk of Mitt's cash was actually earned.  I doubt he'll spend it all but I would expect him to spend anywhere from $50 to $100 million of his own money if he goes to the general election.  Romney's campaign is already showing $17,350,000 in "debt".  Figure he'll spend at least $25 million and probably more on the nomination.
(best guess: $30-40 million on the nomination and $50 million on the general).  That's given him very little splash outside of Iowa and new Hampshire and I don't think it'll be enough on the general election to carry him.

2.  Rudy will be unlikely to take in the $100 million he planned on spending at the start of the campaign.  After 3 quarters he is taking in as much as Mitt from donors ($45 million) but lags on lacking the private stash.  So it's $45 million to $62 million.  He's only got $16,649,825 on hand.  He's going to have to make up ground while being outspent.

3.  Huckabee just can't raise money.  He's still at $651,300 at cash on hand.  That train ain't leaving the station.

4.  Fred Thompson has $5.7 million cash on hand and should be outspent down the stretch in Iowa.  He does poorly in New Hampshire.  Barring "a live boy or a dead girl" type of scandal for Mitt or Rudy, he's in trouble. 

 


[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox