A Progressive Strategy

by: progrimm

Fri Aug 27, 2010 at 16:30


(Waiting on Democratic strategists to figure out what to do is simply a passive way of committing suicide.  Nuts to that. - promoted by Paul Rosenberg)

The following is the culmination of something I've been working on for several weeks. I've put a great deal of my time into this so whatever you do please make sure you watch the video.

progrimm :: A Progressive Strategy

Ask yourself what do all these things have in common...

Trade policies that ship millions of jobs overseas for multinational corporations who work with governments like China that have essentially created an economic system that is best described as modern day slavery.

A fucked up tax system that has billionaires, the 400 richest people in America paying a smaller percent in federal taxes than millions of middle class Americans

Deregulation across several sectors that allowed Wall Street to defraud millions in the middle class out of their money, blow up our economy, and on top of all of that allowed them to get rich doing it.

Deregulation that recently created the largest environmental disaster in our countries history in the gulf.

A lack of regulation that has allowed private for profit health insurance companies to murder thousands and bankrupt millions of Americans by rescinding their care when they needed it the most.

And all of the above forming an equality crisis which allowed

The Walton family (The owners of Walmart), a single family to gobble up more wealth than the bottom 40% of the United States population combined.

The overwhelming majority of economic growth to go exclusively to the rich.

And long list of facts on the collapse of the middle class are

Here

What do all these things have in common?

A. They are the strongest campaign issues we have that all tie together and form a powerful narrative that’s in the mind of most progressive activists that the Republican Party is not merely another political party, but a corporate tool that's policies have systematically stolen the wealth of the middle class in our country and have radically restructured our economy from one that use to grow every Americans wages to one where the wages of the richest rocket, while everyone else’s actually fell and continue to fall.

Yes, there is class warfare being waged in this country and it has been being waged against the majority of Americans by corporations, the wealthy and their Republican puppet voters for the last several decades.

B. They largely have been sitting on the shelf, gathering dust. This tragic, powerful, populist narrative that should right now which should be kicking the utter living shit out of the Republican Party is being unused.

Oh sure, this election year you will see Democrats in October say, Republicans are

Crazy tea baggers who want to privatize Social Security and Medicare
Give more tax cuts to the rich
etc

But that misses most of our most powerful points which are not about what they will do, but about what they already have done.

To quote Robert Riech
The Democrats are reactive at best – notwithstanding the worst string of corporate outrages since the robber barons rampaged in the late nineteenth century. Consider what the public has witnessed over the last year -- the greed and wild recklessness of BP, Goldman-Sachs, Big Pharma, health insurers, and large profitable businesses that continue to lay off millions. Where are the political thought strategists that connect these dots and illuminate these stories and thereby shape a Democratic agenda for the future? Nowhere.

As I said, we aren't doing nearly enough what we have, given all that’s happened and what’s even sadder is that the Republicans are arguably doing more than us with far less.

I've seen it said in several articles this summer, this is a more or less a blame election (and I agree) and while conventional political wisdom suggests that should be bad for us, but given the fact that this narrative has been occurring for decades and delivered it's most devastating wake up blow to the middle class in the 2008 crisis I think conventional wisdom can be turned on it's head here.

We like to think that people in the middle class that vote Republicans don't get it and people who only occasionally or never vote don't understand the stakes.

And that’s true, but why?

In a recent Gallup poll 71% of Americans said they thought the middle class was getting screwed.

Now imagine if you asked the average voter why they are getting screwed
and then ask yourself that question.

You'd probably get a lot of ummms and "the bankers control everything!" from some lifelong Republican tool who voted for the people who championed completely deregulating them and wants to gut the crappy financial reform bill we just passed.

Whereas your response would probably revolve around a combination of the top list.

Right now our narrative (which will hence for refer to as the details of reality) is confined to the blogosphere, documentaries and books.

So how do you change that? How can a net roots movement spread the "details of reality" through the minds of Americans?

That’s what I asked myself when I started thinking about this problem.

We obviously can't depend on our political leaders most of whom are a bunch of pussies, scared to death of the thought of using populism. Our supporters however, the unions, the people who mostly fund our party actually believe we should fight for a middle class!  (The audacity!)

But how?

----------------------
Before I get to that I want to say, let’s not beat around the bush here, Novembers probably going to be ugly for us short of a game changer and the DNC right now sure as hell doesn’t have that.

Attacking the Tea Party surely should be part of the strategy, but our main strategy really?

Look at the shear amount of damage the Republican Party has done to our country in the last few decades that reached its boiling point in 2008 and our strategy mainly revolves around what the Teapublican party might do?!

Their philosophy has been destroying this countries middle class for decades, that’s the lead what they did, not what they will do. What they will do is important as well, but it's a side piece compared to the wave of destruction they've already sent through our country.
--------------------

Back to the how...

An ad campaign that pushes the details of reality.

Ads like this one I made on deregulation.

^^ Video that was here at the top ^^

Or this one I wrote on our collapsing wages.
(Each number (C1, C2, etc) represents a different person in the ad)
In the ad their are young adults standing in front of a white background, (I'm sure you've seen an ad or two that does this)

C1-I'm studying to be a pilot
C2-A biologist
C3-A illustrator
C1-To be in the middle class
C3-but my pay
C2-will never be as much as the previous generation
C1-in my field
C2-because over the last thirty years

C1-The Republican Party deregulated
              C2-Wall Street
               C3-the oil industry
               C1-Removed trade barriers with china
               C2-rewrote the tax code
               C3-redesigned our whole economy

C1-And as a result the middle class makes much less than they did thirty years ago after inflation
C2-While the salaries of the top one percent have rocketed (show graph)
C3-Republican trickle down economics
C1-the rich won and everyone else lost

---------------

Since I got this idea a several weeks ago I have wrote several of ads like the one above, ads I believe form a narrative that will have an impact on the elections.

Be it a legislative fight or an election, every single time the Democratic Party fairs poorly with the electorate we all say the exact same dam thing "The Democrats didn't fight hard enough!"

And while that’s true, I think you would all agree with me that it would be nice if for the first time in our lives, for the first time since FDR rallied progressive populism we would be able to wake up on November 3rd be it a good or bad night and say that we fought as hard as humanly possible.

Whatever you think of this idea you don't need me to tell you the current Democratic establishment strategy won't allow you to say that (because lets be blunt here their plan is as usual weak shit), while I think you'd be hard pressed to argue that my strategy won't.

But I'm just another person, you average poor guy, I don’t possess the resources or connections to pull this off alone, hence this post.

What I do have though is an idea that I think could significantly brighten our odds for 2010 and possibly be a game changer not just for this election, but all the ones to follow.

So if you see something here, if you believe I am onto something as I do and you know someone at the DNC, the Huffington Post, or know anyone anywhere who would like to see this tried and has the resources to do this.

Link them to this now.

The elections are growing near, but Octobers all that matters and strategies can be implemented fast, in the blink of an eye the GOP made the Ground Zero Mosque a campaign issue, and we can do the same with the details of reality

In a matter of weeks we can create a barrage of ads that attack using our issues and if our populist fear pussy leaders won't get on board from the start, even they will start mimicking our messaging once they see it's working.

And when they predictably say we are waging class warfare it won't matter (As it's incredibly easy to counter with....)

Class Warfare

Republican Clip - The democrats are waging class (class!) warfare!
C1- Really.. because when I think about class war
C2- I think about
C3- Republican Wall Street Deregulation that allowed predatory loans to destroy millions of families
C1- Republican Tax rates that had millions in the middle class paying more taxes than billionaires
C2- Republican trade policies that’s shipped millions of jobs to china
C3- and gave the corporations a tax cut to do it!
C1- Resulting in a collapse in middle class wages while the riches rocket through the roof.
(Graph here)
C3- There is class warfare in America
C2- and it has been waged against the middle class by Republicans for the last thirty years
C3- The Republican party of no middle class
C1- No future for you


Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Great Stuff!!! (4.00 / 2)
Unfortunately, I know nobody who has the position or the money to implement something like these ad ideas.  I did leave a comment with Moveon.org

Thx Paul! (0.00 / 0)
Hopefully I can get this viral, this will definitely help.

Sorry. (4.00 / 1)
I didn't like it at all. It is very much anti-Republican Party as opposed to Progressive. These are two very different things IMO. Anti-Republican, the Democrats do pretty well. progressive? Not so very much.

Disagree (4.00 / 1)
While it is true this is anti-Republican, that isn't the most important meme.  It is also anti-corporation and anti-deregulation, which makes it pro-regulation.  This is definitely progressive, not just party politics.

It also takes on the legacy of Reagan head on.  That is probably the most important generic meme we need in this country.  We desperately need to villainize Reaganism.

I don't like the edit at the very end.  A better quote that doesn't feel cut off would work better.  But that is a minor quibble.


[ Parent ]
I'm a progressive (4.00 / 1)
I'm also a liberal. Tell me again, where ideals are concerned, what is the difference between the two?

As far as I'm concerned, the Republican Party declared total war on U.S. democracy (and fundamental humanity) nearly forty years ago. That declaration of total war found its true voice with Reagan. Millons of families suffered and continue to suffer as a result. Hundreds of millions of people now live diminished lives as a result. I look at our society and I do not see democracy. What I see is corporate monopoly, fascism, oligarchy and plutocracy operating under the guise of democracy, courtesy of the Republican Party and their mealy-mouth, neoliberal counterparts in the Democratic Party.

I want us to accentuate the good. That is where hope is to be found. But I also want the criminal gangs, both corporate and political, who run the Republican Party to be held accountable.

Tell me again? Why aren't the leaders of the previous administration on trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity?


[ Parent ]
well, I am not sure what you think I was saying (0.00 / 0)
Whatever you thought here is what I AM saying. I do not think a progressive "strategy" based around anti-Republicans is politically effective now and more basically it is fundamentally dishonest because of how clearly the Democrats and Obama have lined up with the Republicans. Therefore in my opinion a progressive strategy should be based on where we want this country to go and identifying the Democratic and Republican party and the corporate interests standing behind them who are blocking the way (sometimes criminally). It is counterproductive now to base progressive strategy against the Republicans because that immediately raises the question of "so what do I do? vote Democratic". A progressive strategy should be basically positive: it should possibly say we want to rebuild this country its factories, roads, schools, the environment and put Americans back to work. We need healthcare, parks, police, fire departments, social security to ensure our human resources. The enemies of this approach are the Republicans and Obama who put corporate interests ahead of rebuilding this nation. Anyway I did not like the strategy of the main post because it is fundamentally both ineffective given what we are facing and a little dishonest putting all the onus on Republicans when it is clear that Democrats are willingly, even anxious to join in the wrecking of our country.

[ Parent ]
This might be simpler: (0.00 / 0)
if you are basing a "progressive strategy" on being anti-Republican you are ignoring the elephant in the room namely the failed Democratic regime we are living under (with the Presidency, a 60-member Senate, and the House firmly in non-Republican hands...in what is universally perceived as anti-Republican hands). Now unless you make the argument that Democrats = Republicans, the question of what you are selling is immediate and reasonable.  Even to progressives themselves. So either come up with a different strategy around this problem or deal with the problem.  

[ Parent ]
I appreciate your honesty (0.00 / 0)
But give me a break! The Democrats do anti-republican well?

That couldn't be further from the truth.

Nothing says that better than the health-care debate, the Democrats could have devastated the GOP with ads with family members of people who were murdered by for profit rescission.

Instead what did they do? I don't know about you, but I can't recall a single powerful message/ad they pushed on one of the most clear cut moral issues of our time.

The only anti-republican message the Democrats have ever successfully pushed is that the GOP wants to give the rich tax cuts! And even in that they always fail to explain the damage that policy creates.


I guess (0.00 / 0)
we've been there and done that. So much so we elected a President, 60 members of the Senate, and a large majority of the House. and it's got me where? Do you address this possible concern? I missed it. It seems central.

[ Parent ]
Good viddy, Paul. (4.00 / 2)
Although a couple quick notes:

1) As pointedly constructed as your  piece is (style points on that score!), it's also pretty close to some of the Dem ads we're going to see after next weekend. I'd hate to see your hard work get lost amongst the other partisan ads. This will be a busy ad-buying season, after all...

2) As a couple others have noted, it's a partisan ad, not a Progressive ad.

So if you're looking at running this as a web ad, for example, you might consider adding another minute and interspersing Dems with Reps throughout the piece and make it an attack on neo-liberalism overall. If I were a brilliant copywriter for TeeVee, I'd be able to tell you how to do it in 60, but sadly, I'm not. Really, it is sad. At least when I think of the pay scale it's sad!

Personally, I think this is a great time to start railing against the Dem leadership that are so busily smearing us in the WH press room and anywhere near Capital Hill. If they're feeling the least bit vulnerable, this would be the perfect time to start pushing their buttons in a big way, yes?

Also, it will be controversial, which will mean additional media attention outside of the ad buys themselves--which is PR Gold. You might even find yourself on KO, Ed or Rachel.

Ed: Why are you attacking your own party?
Paul: Because they're working for the wrong people, making the wrong decisions and basically DESTROYING MY PARTY. Simple enough fer ya, Ed?

So my suggestion is to create an ad that will create controversy and really stand out. You're already at least half-way there anyway, so why not go full-bore and make sure it stands out in the crowd?

Think Big and make it count for all it's worth!

"More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly." -Woody Allen, My Speech to the Graduates


AMEN! (0.00 / 0)
I feel the same way, and I'm sick to death about it.

[ Parent ]
Don't be sick about it. (0.00 / 0)
It's not worth it.

It'll happen at some point. It pretty much has to.

"More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly." -Woody Allen, My Speech to the Graduates


[ Parent ]
Some thoughts (4.00 / 1)
Thx for the comments guys!

Emocrat, I don't think this ad will have a hard time standing out given the weak stuff are party usually puts out, they can make decent attack ads targeting individuals, but taking on the core tenet of their  ideology like my ad does in regards to deregulation?

I've never seen them do anything like that.

As for making it an attack on neo-liberalism overall I think it already does in a sense. Hell thats one of the bulletins behind my whole ad campaign idea.

A macro bulletin if you will that VLaszlo didn't conside

In other words... by attacking, mastering and building an arsenal of talking points / ads that attack the Republican Party for

Deregulation
Trade
Taxes
Etc

(Which given the material out there the dems have done a piss poor job of doing)

You also craft a weapon that come primary time can easily be deployed against blue dogs / new dems in the future.

As Matson said, while my ad is anti-republican it is more importantly anti-corporation / anti-deregulation



Right. Good points. It's the ideology. (0.00 / 0)
And yes, this ad could be reworked to attack RW Dems too, by only changing a few words in the script and a few of the visual pieces.

Indeed, I have a little conceptual problem with "attacking neo-liberalism," simply because that word is pretty abstract to most people. The deregulation aspect and the natural results of that, say it in concrete terms. Got eggs?

E. Coli Conservatism. That floating in type would look good too. Just planting the seed, as it were.

After thinking on this, as much as I like the GOP with the BP logo in it, I would take a moment to do something like put a picture of the White House in there too. You don't need to mention anything else. I think some might find that, shall we say, interesting. Ultimately, of course, the GOP wants the WH back....

As for it standing out, I would just point out that Grayson and others have done some really good ads in the past and will do so again. You're right about the DNC-type stuff. Weak tea. Then again, I'm not sure they really want to win in November either.


"More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly." -Woody Allen, My Speech to the Graduates


[ Parent ]
From a democratic (small "d") ecosystem point of view, I suppose this ad has value (0.00 / 0)
However, it's not the the part of a democratic ecosystem that I personally would support (if I actually had any money to financially support ads). That's because I consider both Democratic and Republican parties to be little better than crime families, in the sense that inside-the-beltway ones, who have most of the power, use it to massively screw the public, essentially helping steal great sums of money from them, on behalf of their corporate and bankster patrons.

From a document that I recently updated and expanded, about how to fix democracy:

The author was disgusted to observe that politicians who voted for Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which destroyed the positive regulatory effects of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, thereby setting the stage for the mega financial blowout of recent years, and who still held office, essentially escaped even vilification, much less accountability in the form of forced retirement during their next re-election campaign. I haven't researched this, but I'm quite confident that not a single politician so much as apologized for voting for this monstrosity. This Act was "was approved in the Senate by a vote of 90 to 8 and in the House tonight by 362 to 57." (source: NY Times). In other words, it was a bipartisan total failure.

Likewise, the author was disgusted to observe that politicians who voted for the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, which capped liability for offshore oil spills at $75 million, also escaped vilification, accountability in the form of being targeted for being voted out of office, and failed (so far as I know) to so much as apologize for their folly. This act was approved in the House by a vote of 360 - 0  with 72 not voting. It was also approved unanimously in the Senate, with only 1 not voting. Yet another bipartisan total failure.

Well, at least the ad helps expose the Republican crime family....

435 Dem Primaries 2012
Coffee Party Usa
TheRealNews.Com


Or, as the old saying goes... (0.00 / 0)
"Better half a meme, than no meme at all!"

435 Dem Primaries 2012
Coffee Party Usa
TheRealNews.Com


[ Parent ]
Well, you can't critique an entire system in 60 seconds. (0.00 / 0)
You can do it with a campaign, but not with a single ad.

"More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly." -Woody Allen, My Speech to the Graduates

[ Parent ]
You could certainly share the spotlight on any given issue between D's and R's (0.00 / 0)
30 seconds for each, when both are more or less equally culpable.

435 Dem Primaries 2012
Coffee Party Usa
TheRealNews.Com


[ Parent ]
My visual thought was to simply intersperse the faces... (0.00 / 0)
... Starting with the corporate images, statements about tax breaks and dereg and start off very quickly putting in Dem faces (1 or 2 seconds each at first, making them longer with each iteration)... until the basically meld together.

McCain/Obama, Reid/McConnell, Pelosi/Boehner and so on. until the viewer has a hard time telling them apart.

"More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly." -Woody Allen, My Speech to the Graduates


[ Parent ]
ooh, me like (0.00 / 0)
Where are the "bold progressives", when you need them, to fund the airing of such ads?

435 Dem Primaries 2012
Coffee Party Usa
TheRealNews.Com


[ Parent ]
Love the video - great job! n/t (0.00 / 0)


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox