Newt: What part of "States' rights are for white people" don't you understand?

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sat Sep 04, 2010 at 15:00


Or, actually, in light of his state-level back-up plan, "What part of 'Property rights are for white people' don't you understand"?

TPM:

Gingrich: Make Ground Zero A National Battlefield To Stop The Supposed Mosque
Rachel Slajda | September 2, 2010, 6:26PM

The majority of New Yorkers want the developers of Park51, known to its opponents as the "Ground Zero mosque," to voluntarily move the community center further from Ground Zero -- but the majority also acknowledges the developers' right to build there if they want.

Newt Gingrich doesn't feel that way. In a radio interview today, he said he wants the national government to step in and stop the developers from building the Islamic community center by whatever means necessary.

"I think the Congress has the ability to declare the area a national battlefield memorial because I think we should think of the World Trade Center as a battlefield site; this is a war," he said, apparently thinking that if Ground Zero was a national park, Park51 would be restricted from building near it.

And if that fails, he said, the state government should step in and use its considerable power to stymie the development.

"The Attorney General of New York, Andrew Cuomo, could intervene because frankly he has the ability to slow it down for decades if he wants to."

Ah, yes!  Newtie was just like Haley Barbour, part of the GOP's "New South" that had nothing to do with segregation, no siree!

There is, of course, a precedent for this not-so-colorblind interpretation of "states' rights."  It's called the "Fugitive Slave Act."  It basically said that non-slave states had no rights at all to stop the invasion of slave state terrorists.

Ain't Newt grand?  Jefferson Davis would be so proud!

Paul Rosenberg :: Newt: What part of "States' rights are for white people" don't you understand?

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Okay, let's have a monument, then, (4.00 / 1)
but not one commemorating the war between bigotry and Islam. How about one commemorating the war between New York and Georgia? (We already have plenty of those, you say? Well, yeah, we do, but those are for the first one.)

Moose-killing America can do what it likes. I'm betting on New York (and California, even in its present state of embarrassment.)


Only, declaring ground zero a battleground (4.00 / 1)
wouldn't do anything, because Park51 isn't on ground zero.  

They'd probably get around it (0.00 / 0)
By defining it as any building directly damaged on September 11, which would include the Park51 site.

Things You Don't Talk About in Polite Company: Religion, Politics, the Occasional Intersection of Both

[ Parent ]
What do facts have to do with anything? (4.00 / 3)
Dammit, get with the program.

[ Parent ]
You're No Fun (4.00 / 2)
Newt is simply trying to be helpful. He wants to shame Democrats into doing the right thing, the real American thing, and act out in racist ways. What good is life in the USA if you can't kick a few people while pretending to do no such thing? What else is there to do in this country but oppress people and make money? (And if you're Republican, hire hookers and wear diapers. Or cheat on your wives. Or solicit help in airport bathroom stalls.)

It's a testament to the intellectual bankruptcy of the GOP that Newt is still around and still considered an intellectual, a guiding light for their party. If they weren't a political party, the GOP could be an adult circus.


This seems like one of those issues... (4.00 / 1)
...that Republicans see as a way to make those of the left look out of touch.  Instead of calling everyone racist, we should educate people that just because the World Trade Center was destroyed in the name of Islam, doesn't mean that most adherents of Islam supported that destruction.  Perhaps the words of those who want to build the mosque, their abhorrence for the destruction that was done would go a long way in showing that the actions of 11-Sep should not reflect on Islam as a whole.

Let's get the focus back to corporate power and how the right doesn't give a damn for working people in this country.

Regards,

Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me-and I welcome their hatred. - FDR


I'm Not Calling EVERYONE A Racist (0.00 / 0)
I'm calling NEWT GINGRICH a racist.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
Actually I doubt he is a racist... (0.00 / 0)
...probably a better description would be human chameleon who will do anything to win an election.

Regards,

Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me-and I welcome their hatred. - FDR


[ Parent ]
does it matter? (0.00 / 0)
his behavior is clear

[ Parent ]
No it doesn't (4.00 / 1)
A person who uses racial resentment for political gain is a racist. The desire to make this about what is in someone's heart, which is largely unknowable, is a distraction.  It functions to defend people who do racist things by changing the conversation.

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.

[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox