Worse than Watergate?

by: Mike Lux

Thu Oct 14, 2010 at 18:00


A couple of weeks back I suggested that the strong possibility that the Chamber and Rove's American Crossroads group were taking and using money from foreign companies for their scores of millions of dollars in attack ads was the biggest story of this election cycle. This money comes from undisclosed sources, and the secretive nature of these millions in contributions raises huge doubts about who these sources are, what their motives are, and what industries and countries they come from. We know the Chamber is taking a minimum of over $800,000 from foreign companies, and the total is likely many millions more- the 800 is what researchers have been able to find from a smattering of public materials, but we know there is more the Chamber isn't telling us. The Chamber and Rove deny they are using foreign money for their ad campaign, but since they vehemently, adamantly refuse to disclose their donors, we can't know the truth. If it is not foreign money, fine: just tell us how much Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Bank of America, BP, Massey Mining, Prudential and all the rest of your corporate special interest friends are giving.

The White House and other Democrats have been right to jump all over this: this is as fundamental issue to our democracy as there is. Tim Kaine raised the stakes again today, suggesting that the potential scandal involved was as big a deal as Watergate. My only disagreement is that in many ways, this is worse. The slush fund money Dick Nixon's operation raised and spent was penny ante compared to the money being raised today.

Corporate special interests are trying to buy this election. What voters need to do is to think, whenever another nasty attack ad comes on the tube paid for the Chamber, American Crossroads, or some groups with a mysterious name you have never heard, ask yourself:

  • Where did they get the money for that ad?

  • Why did the companies giving millions of dollars to run this ad want to help the Republican candidate they are helping?

  • What sweetheart deals will the candidates they are helping be doing for those big contributors?

  • Why should we believe anything we are seeing on this ad, given the people paying for it don't want you to know who is behind it?

If this sleazy, secretive strategy works for Rove and the Chamber, and if nothing is done to require disclosure of these fat cat donors, our democracy truly is in trouble for a long time to come. Let's hope the voters ask themselves those questions.

Mike Lux :: Worse than Watergate?

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

It May Be After The Fact, But... (4.00 / 1)
Congress should subpoena all those records during the lame-duck session as a part of its consideration of the DISCLOSE legislation.  At the least, this would be a distraction from House Republicans braying for an impeachment inquiry.  And, it might just reveal enough sordidness that it shames Chris Matthew and the Village into some feigned outrage:  Gambling, in Rick's?  Round up twice the usual suspects!

Yeah, right. (0.00 / 0)
In the alternate universe where Democrats actually fight for what they claim to believe in, that would totally happen. Of course in that universe Dems wouldn't lose their majority in the first place.

miasmo.com

[ Parent ]
How about the Foreign Agents Registration Act? (4.00 / 5)
The act requires people and organizations that are under foreign control ("agents of a foreign principal") to register with the Department of Justice when acting on behalf of foreign interests. This law defines the agent of a foreign principal as someone who:

Engages in political activities for or in the interests of a foreign principal;
Acts in a public relations capacity for a foreign principal;

Solicits or dispenses any thing of value within the United States for a foreign principal;

Represents the interests of a foreign principal before any agency or official of the U.S. government.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...

In Watergate, crimes were committed, some people were prosecuted and went to prison. The president avoided prosecution himself by resigning.

So my question is, why is the DOJ not investigating these people under FARA? If DOJ is okay with investigating Quaker pacifists as terrorists, then why not the US Chamber under all sorts of racketeering, corruption, money-laundering and FARA?

Because if this really is worse than Watergate, then these are high crimes we're talking about here, not a PR issue with voters. We should be seeing search warrants, not press releases, yes?


"More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly." -Woody Allen, My Speech to the Graduates


re: DOJA (4.00 / 3)
So my question is, why is the DOJ not investigating these people under FARA?

too busy filing appeals against decisions that go against DADT?


[ Parent ]
Touché! (0.00 / 0)


"More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly." -Woody Allen, My Speech to the Graduates

[ Parent ]
Why Are They Hiding? What Are They Hiding? Who Are They Hiding? (4.00 / 1)
What Do They Really Want To Do?

IMHO, the best thing the Dems could do is to make this a key issue.  As in make national campaign ads about it.  (I always think it's better to make 2-4 related ads rather than just one.  But hey, I'm a writer!)

Either way, just a few exposures could go a long way, if done properly. Then every time one of the corporate-funded ads ran it would serve to reactivate people's memory of the counter-ad.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


The ads would write themselves, wouldn't they? (4.00 / 2)
"Your stuff is made in China. Why not you politic? Vote China in 2010!" -- This message approved by the US Chamber of Commerce.

"The US Chamber of Commerce is deeply committed to creating jobs. In China!"

"Thanks to the US Chambers tireless efforts to expand oil drilling to most of the US coastline, now the entire East Coast will get to have their own Gulf Oil Disasters too!"


"More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly." -Woody Allen, My Speech to the Graduates


[ Parent ]
It's tempting but dangerous (0.00 / 0)
to play the xenophobia card.  Before you know it, the country is psychologically prepared for war - economic war, cyber war, proxy war. Better to keep the focus where it belongs, i.e., on reining in supranational corporate predators.

[ Parent ]
No risk, no award. (4.00 / 1)
And China is the enemy, don't forget that. It's a horrible dictatorship whose power is increasing steadily. There's nothing wrong with stewadfastly opposing that. What do you advocate instead, appeasement?

[ Parent ]
Well, I see Belohnung (4.00 / 1)
can mean both "award" and "reward" but the operative word in this case is reward, which is also nicely alliterative.

I just can't figure out whether we're reliving WWII or the Cold War, though sometimes WWI gets a mention. Let's call it the Cold War and say 'detente' rather than 'appeasement'.:)


[ Parent ]
Re: Of course, re! (0.00 / 0)
REward, sure. Damn, when I'm not concentrating on this stuff I regularly make such mistakes. Well, at least I didn't write montgomeryward!

[ Parent ]
It's a fair point, but all I did was take an existing trope and flip it on it's head. (0.00 / 0)
This, of course, would then force the corporatists to defend their position. It's not a very defensible position, so they'd have to be able to defuse the xenophobia themselves.

It usually works the other way, yes?

I used China in these examples mostly out of convenience. Also because our ruling elites' investment portfolios have all benefitted greatly from corporate off-shoring of US jobs. Lastly, because there are no businesses in China that aren't joined at the hip with the PLA, so that's de facto evidence of foreign agent participation in US policy-making, either through the Chamber's lobbying or electioneering.

With Russian money, the government is probably involved there too. Possibly the mob as well. In the middle east, they're taking money from states that use slave labor and actual slaves, not to mention financial support to terrorist groups.

The list is long. Perhaps one of the best ways of undermining the xenophobia is to show quite clearly just how embroiled these foreign interests are with our own economic institutions, government and corporations.

Our ruling elites have been persistently undermining US sovereignty for decades, not as direct favors to foreign interests, but as necessitated by US corporate interests. Thing is, thanks to globalization, the two can't be separated anymore.

You use the word "predators" and I think that's a great one. But if we're talking about ad campaigns, that has to be used in a way guaranteed to get attention and hold it. In this sense, the xenophobic aspect has nice intra-party wedge potential. Wedges can be very useful.

"More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly." -Woody Allen, My Speech to the Graduates


[ Parent ]
Worse than watergate? (4.00 / 2)
Uhm, no, unless there are plots to murder journalists, firebomb unfriendly think tanks and plant bugs in the HQ of political opponents.  My understanding of Watergate was never about the money.

However I suppose if you consider the total crime to be the purchase of American democracy and count all the bad stuff the Republicans will do in office to repay the Chamber, then yes, the grand magnitude of the crime might eclipse Watergate.  Once again, there really is a vast right wing conpiracy and here it is.


The problem now is (4.00 / 1)
that a big business/republican worshiping media is going to studiously ignore this issue.

Media IS big business... (4.00 / 1)
and attack ads are a big revenue source.

Who is paying?

Don't ask don't tell, as long as the check clears.

There is no such thing as a free market.


[ Parent ]
Toles nailed it (0.00 / 0)
Q:Any new -gate scandal?

A: Floodgate

http://voices.washingtonpost.c...


There is no such thing as a free market.


Mystifying (0.00 / 0)
I've been wondering all cycle why the Dems haven't connected the dots:

Banks rip off little guy in mortgage frauds.  Banks caused financial meltdown.  GOP supports banks.  GOP obstructs laws that could strengthen regulation of banks.  Now banks give millions of undisclosed dollars to GOP to buy their support to create another financial meltdown. Meanwhile, BP and other foreign corporations are flooding elections with undisclosed donations to ensure that they will not be regulated.

Now Rob Johnson (insert other name here) wants to deregulate banks, corporations, oil, etc.

Or how about this:
Joe Barton thinks we should apologize to BP for making them pay to clean up their oil spill in the Gulf. John Boehner voted against extending health care to children, and for allowing insurance companies to cancel people's health insurance for pre-existing conditions, (etc. etc. etc.).  If we elect (GOP name here) Boehner and Barton will assume house leadership positions.  Do we really want people that are supported by insurance companies and BP to control Congress?

Etc.


Foreign CoC donors are 'leaders in outsourcing' (4.00 / 1)
The Chamber is openly lobbying for US companies to outsource their jobs to India, Singapore, etc.



I know this is about foreign corporations (4.00 / 1)
But would it be wrong to tap into nationalistic fervor by implying that some money is coming from foreign governments, especially from countries that are non-Western and non-white?

Imagine a TV ad with pictures of foreign leaders, preferably dressed in foreign garb that may seem weird to middle America, and a voice-over giving their names and the countries they represent.  Then it is stated that the US Chamber of Commerce doesn't want you to know if these men are helping to fund their political ads. And Republicans don't want you to know either.  The disembodied voice asks, "What are they hiding?"

Things You Don't Talk About in Polite Company: Religion, Politics, the Occasional Intersection of Both


tax deductibility?? (0.00 / 0)
Are these contributions a business expense to the givers? Can we now make our political donations deductible if we just use a personal corporation or LLC to write the check? It is hard to imagine that the money we are talking about is straight out of after tax profits. Just thinking.

USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox