Remember That This Is A Conservative Congress

by: Chris Bowers

Mon Nov 05, 2007 at 14:53


Now that Congress has a record low approval rating, it is important to remember how we were all told this time last year that the 2006 midterm elections were a victory for conservatives, and a defeat for progressives. Prominent conservatives, Republicans and other media figures all declared last year's election as a great victory for conservatives. Here are just some relevant quotes to demonstrate this, starting with Laura Ingraham, October 30, 2006:

[A]ll these Democrats are running fairly conservative campaigns…. Ronald Reagan is up there smiling down on us right now saying that, all things considered, conservatism isn't doing so bad.

William Bennett, November 6, 2006:

William Bennett echoed Ingraham, asserting that "Democrats have an advantage" because they have recruited candidates in competitive districts "who, except for the 'D,' you would think are conservative Republicans."

Jim Wallis, November 8, 2006:

In this election, both the Religious Right and the secular Left were defeated, and the voice of the moral center was heard.

Bob Scheiffer, November 8, 2006:

These Democrats that were elected last night are conservative Democrats.

Larry Kudlow, November 8, 2006

Look at blue dog conservative Dem victories, and look at Northeast liberal GOP defeats. The changeover in the House may well be a conservative victory, not a liberal one.

Tony Snow, November 8, 2006:

But despite the new House leaders, White House officials are not writing off the chamber as a bastion of liberalism, Snow said, adding that Bush believes the chamber will actually mirror his thinking on issues -- and perhaps even reject Pelosi's on occasion.

"Three dozen blue dogs have voted against her on various issues," Snow said, using a nickname for conservative Democrats. "And it's the conservative Democrats who made real gains."

Rush Limbaugh, November 8, 2006:

"[L]iberalism didn't win anything yesterday; Republicanism lost. Conservatism was nowhere to be found other than on the Democrat [sic] side of the aisle."

Peter Baker and Jim VandeHei, November 8, 2006

[T]he Democrats' victory was built on the back of more centrist candidates seizing Republican-leaning districts

Tucker Carlson, November 16, 2006

CARLSON: [S]he [Pelosi] was one of the architects of this midterm election strategy, in which you saw a lot of genuinely -- or some genuinely conservative Democrats. Heath Shuler -- I mean, that guy's more conservative than most Republicans in the House.

****

Never forget that we were told after last year's elections that the actual victory was for conservatives and conservatism. I remember fighting against that narrative at the time, but it is growing more and more difficult to not see that narrative as accurate. A working conservative majority in firmly in place where filibusters and vetoes and be used indefinitely by the Republican minority and Bush until enough conservative Democrats break ranks and pass conservative legislation on virtually everything. Republicans were broadly defeated by progressive messaging on Iraq withdrawal, economic inequality and corruption, but a combination of Bush staying in office, a sizable Republican congressional majority after the 2004 elections, and intentionally conservative recruiting by Rahm Emanuel in several House districts allowed conservatives to stay in power nonetheless.

Conservatives and Republicans claimed this Congress was conservative, and the working conservative majority bears them out. I say we let them have it. If Republicans and conservatives make any complaints about the way Congress is operating, let's just point out that they claimed in was a conservative Congress last year. Record low approval ratings demonstrate that America doesn't like this conservative majority anymore than they liked the previous conservative majority, after all. This is especially since the same liberal leadership that conservatives and Republicans keep complaining about actually appear to be proposing things that the majority of the country would like to see passed into law:

CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll. Sept. 7-9, 2007. N=1,017 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3.

"Do you think the policies being proposed by the Democratic leaders in the U.S. House and Senate would move the country in the right direction or the wrong direction?"

Right direction 50%--39% Wrong Direction

America is tired of conservatives being in charge. They want progressives for a change.

Chris Bowers :: Remember That This Is A Conservative Congress

Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Interesting (0.00 / 0)
On the one hand, it's not hard to believe that Sixpack is heartily sick of the current regime in Washington, and more or less gives the Dems a pass even though they've controlled Congress this year.

On the other - I can't think Sixpack wholly forgets that the Dems in 06 distinctly oversold their capacity for effecting change. (Water under the bridge, though.)

And I'm not clear what, apart from an end to gridlock, Sixpack wants to see replacing the current mess in 09.

The 11 point margin is for the current Dem leaderships' policies. (A pop quiz of respondents on what they thought those policies were might make that stat seem less impressive!)

I don't think you can infer from that anything about the popularity of the 08 Dem offering (whatever that might turn out to be) - or, indeed, the popularity of a program that would command majority support among the netroots.

My suspicion is that what Sixpack wants from Washington is an end not to conservatism but to incompetence. 


Incompetence a la Rosenberg (0.00 / 0)
Paer Paul Rosenberg's series, Republicans are by definition competent at winning elections but totally incompetent at running government.  You can't end incompetence without ending conservative rule.

[ Parent ]
Healthcare will be the decider (0.00 / 0)
When we have a Dem president, if universal healthcare is thwarted the first two years, 2010 will be the conservative purge. Based on the polling, that's the key issue voters want resolved.

The only way I expect 2008 to be that big sweep-out year is if we're in a bad recession next fall, which remains a possibility.


They weren't right (0.00 / 0)
It wasn't a conservative victory by any means.  Republicans lost decisively, and Democrats gained narrow control.  Conservatives lost significant ground, and progressives made significant gains, but weren't able to take control.  Which leaves us with a Democratic majority as well as a conservative one.

It was a victory for progressives, and next year will be a repeat, but we'll actually be running things in a meaningful sense.

I support John McCain because children are too healthy anyway.


Good catch, Chris - (0.00 / 0)
(I'm going to assume that your links prove your thesis, which I wouldn't do for a lot of bloggers.) I have to admit that I completely missed this phenomenon. I just have way more important things to do than monitor the right-wing, so it's a good thing that someone is willing to do it.

So - wow - the right-wing punditocracy seems to have nailed it. I hate to admit that, too, but the proof is there in your post. We all knew that Rahm was recruiting a certain number of candidates just because they could win with a D beside their names, but most of us did not immediately catch on to the implications of that fact. Then the decisions by Congress were so frustrating that it was probably psychologically imperative to rant, rather than analyze.

Again, I say "good catch". Whether you meant to do so, or not, this evidence substantiates the 'Bush Dog' project of this blog. We have to focus on moving the party as much as possible within the next 7 - 9 months (congressional primaries), which essentially means challenging and, if possible, changing the leadership in Blue Dog districts.

If you recognize my name, you know that I am a party activist in Brian Baird's district, and I am working on a primary challenge for him. Do y'all keep an active list-serve of Bush Dog opposition projects? I mean long-term mini-blogs where local activists can discuss and plan? I realize that such centralized groups make it easy for the Bush Dogs to 'listen in', but it seems to me that our policy points are obvious and public. Primary election tactics and strategy could, and probably should, be saved for face-to-face meetings.

p.s. - could y'all lose the snog t-shirt ads?

By the way - did I mention that I'm running for president?


Conservative Congress, Progressive Election (0.00 / 0)
The fact that the Congress is conservative doesn't mean that the pundits were right that the D election victory was a result of a lineup of conservative candidates. Certainly in the most conservative districts that went Democratic, the Democrats that won were conservative (though less so than the Rs they defeated). But in more ideologically balanced districts and states (Ohio and Virginia come first to mind) candidates with progressive values, at least on economic issues, did better than in many years. It's just that the newly elected members make up a relatively small portion of the House and Senate. So the bodies are still conservative--just less so. That's not to say it isn't disappointing though.

USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox