New Hampshire Polling on Residual Forces

by: fladem

Sun Nov 11, 2007 at 11:19


This morning UNH released the cross-tabs for its New Hampshire Poll.  The poll shows Hillary leading Obama 35-21.  I am writing a diary here, though, because it is the first poll to directly ask the question about residual forces.

Voters where given three options (and this is the text used in the question):
1. Withdraw all troops immediately
2. Keep Troops only for US Diplomatic Protection
3. Keeps Troops as long as necessary

fladem :: New Hampshire Polling on Residual Forces
Here are the results:

Withdraw all troops immediately (22%)
Keep troops to protect Diplomats (57%)
Stay as long as needed (20%)

I was surprised that withdraw now is only supported by 22%.  It is worth noting that Richardson's supporters are somewhat more likely to favor immediate withdraw than those of other candidates (27% vs only 15% for Obama and 14% for Edwards).

One poll result I would think would bring a smile to the Obama people this morning: 44% said a candidate's position on Iraq was VERY important.  The initial vote on Iraq may be why Clinton and Obama are tied at 24% on the question of who has shown the best judgment. The debate gaffe (which may also be a factor in the judgment question )also has weakened Clinton on another metric: who is the most honest and trustworthy (Obama wins this 26% to 19 % for both Clinton and Edwards).

Hillary's strength is made up of three things:
1.  Most experienced (Clinton beats Obama 47-4, Richardson is in second at 14)
2.  She is best able to win in November (53-17 over Obama).
3.  She is the strongest leader (47-14 over Obama.)

She has three weaknesses:
1.  Honesty
2.  Judgment
3.  Best able to bring need change (she leads Obama only 31-26)

Two of Hillary's strengths would, I think, be greatly effected by losing Iowa (Best able to win,  strongest leader).  But the experience gap may simply be too much for Obama to overcome, and suggests Edwards or Richardson may be more dangerous in the end to Hillary.

In a sign of just how deep the immigration issue is running among the Republicans, 52% of Republican voters said their position on immigration was VERY important.

Stop and think about that for a second. More GOP voters think immigration is very important than Democrats voters who think that a candidate's initial vote on Iraq is very important.


Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
The problem as I see it (0.00 / 0)
Is with the poll. "Keep troops to protect diplomats" is actually the "no residual force" plan that has been at the center of the argument. A better poll would have gone like:

1--Keep only troops to protect the embassy or none
2--Keep troops to train Iraqis, engage in counter-terrorism, and protect the embassy
3--Keep a force of roughly the current size or more

Something like that would have polled the debate over residual forces. I don't think this poll did that.

Sorry (0.00 / 0)
Option 1 is the way the Richardson policy plays.  Richardson actually is closer to option 2 but ...
Pption 2 is closest to Rdwards. (3500 to 5000 troops)
We really need an option 3, reduce troops by half to 60,000 (Obama and Clinton)
The current option 3 is the Republican "plan" with the exception of Ron Paul.

[ Parent ]
I agree (0.00 / 0)
the wording wasn't as nuanced as I would have like.

I do think, though, that it as a very good sign that there was enough awareness in New Hampshire about this issue that a pollster felt the need to include a question on it.


[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox