Greenpeace Defends Their Praise of Republican Dave Reichert

by: Matt Stoller

Wed Dec 12, 2007 at 19:24


This is a response from Daniel Kessler of Greenpeace to my post, 'The WTF Files: Greenpeace Praise Republican Dave Reichert (WA-08)'.  Progressive groups that are criticized on OpenLeft have the right to respond on this site, and I am pleased that Kessler is taking us up on it.

Greenpeace is a fiercely independent and non-partisan campaigning organization. We stand to tackle the planet's most threatening environmental problems and achieve solutions. Partisan politics is not our game.

Global warming is the most critical problem facing our planet, requiring a massive shift in our nation's priorities. It's not just an issue for progressives - solutions will only be reached when liberals and conservatives move to achieve them. Greenpeace's global warming campaign, Project Hot Seat, is working to get Congress to reduce carbon emissions to a level prescribed by the scientific community in order to preserve life on this planet as we know it. Washington's 8th district, represented by Congressman Dave Reichert, has been a priority of Greenpeace since early 2006.

The progressive community has made Reichert a frequent punching bag, and sometimes rightly so. After all, it wasn't until Greenpeace began to mobilize his constituents last year that he finally expressed an opinion on global warming. At first, Reichert made claims that the science wasn't in, that it was unclear to him that global warming was indeed caused by humans. Through aggressive campaigning that put Reichert in the hot seat, his tune eventually shifted to more accurately reflect that of his constituents. Volunteers and Greenpeace members made hundreds of phone calls, delivered bundles of letters and petitions, met him at every public event to talk to him about the issue, and sat down with him in his office to lay down their demands.

Matt Stoller :: Greenpeace Defends Their Praise of Republican Dave Reichert
Over the last few months, he supported stronger fuel economy standards for cars and trucks and signed onto the Climate Stewardship Act, a good bill that is a step in the right direction, but doesn't go far enough. Last week he voted for the House energy bill, and was one of only 14 Republicans to do so. Greenpeace will continue to applaud our targets when they meet a specific demand and we will continue to encourage him to co-sponsor the strongest global warming bill in the House--the Safe Climate Act.

Greenpeace doesn't endorse candidates. Reichert's leading opponent in next year's election, Darcy Burner, has a strong position on global warming solutions. She has stood up and committed to supporting strong action on climate change, if elected.  Greenpeace will continue to push both candidates for this office to adopt truly visionary global warming plans. Unless Dave Reichert leaves his seat or is unseated, it's his vote that counts in the House. Please join us in our effort to turn up the heat on Rep. Reichert.  When it comes to global warming, we need Republicans too.  We only have one chance to get this right.  Progressives should understand that.


Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Republicans support only a "Me-First" agenda - Greenpeace is mistaken. (0.00 / 0)
I think it's clear that special interest groups like Greenpeace or NARAL or the Sierra Club miss the big picture.  Republicans do not support a "we're in this together" framework for organizing our society.  Anything that helps get Republicans elected is working against this liberal/progressive frame.

Democrats at least try to vote to this liberal/progressive frame, and they can't pass legislation until we've reduced the Republicans in Congress to such a point we can override their fillibustering of legislation.  Greenpeace is being stupid - period.

Chalk up one more special interest fragment of the progressive coalition I'll never donate to.  They do their cause ultimately more harm than good by giving Republicans like Reichert cover with their latest approbations.


run the other way (0.00 / 0)
"Greenpeace is a fiercely independent and non-partisan campaigning organization."

Yes. Of course it is.


this is somewhere between crap and a joke (0.00 / 0)
Even worse, it is a waste.

On twitter: @BobBrigham

Carrot and stick must be balanced (0.00 / 0)
Sure, it's great that Dave Reichert is a little less awful than he normally has been. That's progress. And that should be praised. But you need to balance the carrot and stick in proportion to how much good they're doing. If he's only voting the right way occasionally, the stick is much more important.

Especially because, whilst you don't endorse, Reichert can use that praise to make his environmental record sound much better than it is, helping him to beat off challengers with much better positions on the issue.

Half a loaf is better than none, but I fear that you're missing the long-term picture here.

Forgotten Countries - a foreign policy-focused blog


Misguided (0.00 / 0)
Greenpeace obviously mistakenly believe they had anything to do with Reichert's votes.

They, like other groups, dig their own hole - and then stick their head in it.

On The Road To 2008: Commentary on issues as we countdown to the next opportunity to change the direction of America


Greenpeace should ask themselves this... (0.00 / 0)
If it was so easy to turn Dave Reichert into an environment loving congressman, what makes Greenpeace so sure that some organization that represents egregious polluters can't just as easily turn him back to their way of thinking?

Coalition Politics... it's amazing how many liberal causes just don't get it.


Greenpeace response (0.00 / 0)
You will always "have Republicans" in meaningless-gesture votes. However, the overwhelming majority of elected Rs would just as soon blow up the planet than do something meaningful about green issues,thus rendering guys like Reichert eunichs. Grow up for god's sake.

Global Warming Solutions Should Always be Commended (0.00 / 0)
If the USA wants to be a part of global warming solutions, we need both Republicans and Democrats to support mandates to fix the problem. I think that any Representative, regardless of their affiliation, should be commended when they take a stand to protect the environment. Burner is doing great, no doubt, but Reichert is looking better and deserves a thanks.

USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox