Other Shoe Drops On Boswell's Iraq Flip

by: Chris Bowers

Sun Dec 23, 2007 at 00:36


On Thursday, Matt noted that only two Bush Dogs, Dan Lipinski and Leonard Boswell, did the right thing and flipped to vote against blank check Iraq war funding:

Lipinski has a primary challenge, which explains his change of heart, and suggests that he is taking Mark Pera very seriously.  Boswell is a more interesting case that I cannot explain at this point.

Well, now it seems that an explanation is at hand:

Former State Representative Ed Fallon, who lost a narrow three-way Democratic primary for governor in 2006, may be planning to challenge third district Democratic Congressman Leonard Boswell in 2008.  Rumors of Fallon's possible challenge to Boswell have circulated for over a year, but Iowa Independent has uncovered new evidence which seems to confirm them.

According to the internet domain registry, on November 21, the domain names FallonForCongress.com, FallonForCongress.net, and FallonForCongress.org were registered to an organization called "Fallon for Congress."  Although the domain names do not currently point to a campaign web site, the physical address listed for each of them in the internet domain registry matches Fallon's home address in the Sherman Hill neighborhood of Des Moines.

It is something of an open secret that Fallon, a former state legislator and a very strong progressive, is considering a run against Boswell. While Fallon narrowly lost the 2006 gubernatorial primary to Chet Culver, he actually pulled in the most votes the IA-03. Given that Boswell's neo-conservative voting record on Iraq and civil liberties could easily come back to haunt him in a lean Democratic district like IA-03, especially against a strong campaigner like Fallon, it is also an open secret that Boswell's first good vote on Iraq is a response to the threat that Fallon poses.

Given that the only two Bush Dogs to flip on Iraq are either facing a serious primary challenge, or facing the possibility of a serious primary challenge, I have to agree with kos. Primary challenges are just about the only power we have to change Democratic congressional behavior.

Chris Bowers :: Other Shoe Drops On Boswell's Iraq Flip

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
We'll lose the district without Boswell (4.00 / 1)
Whether it's worth it or not, I don't know. Just sayin'

Any evidence? (4.00 / 2)
Everything I've heard suggests that Boswell underperformed in 2006 and I don't remember anything suggesting that the district's demographics have changed significantly since the last census. Kowalski's diary for the Bush Dog campaign actually suggests it's becoming more Democratic.

A relentlessly negative campaign could sink the winner of the primary, but Knollenberg got away with it for the GOP in a Michigan district that wasn't that Republican (and in a wave year too). Add to that the facts that the NRCC has too little money to go on offence in many districts, that the GOP is heavily behind on generic ballots and that Boswell is old enough that retirement might look attractive, and it seems likes this is the best cycle to try a primary. We need a new representative who can build a powerbase if there is to be any chance of Iowa having a 3-1 margin in House representation when redistricting comes around (as Boswell's district will almost certainly be the one that disappears).

Forgotten Countries - a foreign policy-focused blog


[ Parent ]
tough primaries are good (0.00 / 0)
In 2006 a lot of Iowa Democrats worried about our tough gubernatorial primary, especially since the well-funded Jim Nussle got his only primary opponent to drop out.

I supported Fallon, but even though he lost the primary, he showed how many progressives there are in Iowa and won Polk County, the largest in the 3rd CD. Also, Chet Culver emerged from the primary a stronger candidate than he would have been without a tough primary. He crushed Nussle by 10 points, which was huge even in a Democratic year.

Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.


[ Parent ]
no--Boswell underperformed (0.00 / 0)
getting something like 6,000 fewer votes in Polk County than Culver did in 2006. A big change from 2004, when Boswell got about 17,000 more votes in Polk County than Kerry.

I am a yellow-dog Democrat, but many of my friends refused to check the box for Boswell after his vote on the torture bill. These people would enthusiastically volunteer to GOTV for Ed Fallon.

I think Fallon could hold this district, and even if he loses the primary, the challenge will improve Boswell's voting record over the next six month.

Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.


[ Parent ]
Boswell Vs Fallon (4.00 / 2)
Tell me where to donate to Fallon and where to show up and I will go into action. In fact, I will do my best, pour my political spirit into the effort, to support any and all Democrats, nation-wide, who choose to challenge incumbent Bush-Dog democrats. I pledge my wallet and my shoes to the task of reclaiming the Democratic Party for an America that provides responsible leaders, and leadership to the Free World. So help me God!

Same here (4.00 / 1)
More my wallet than my shoes in this case, as Iowa is over 1000 miles away, but still...

[ Parent ]
Fallon's a good progressive populist (0.00 / 0)
Dems ought to be able to hold this seat with either Boswell or Fallon -- particularly this coming election year. But with Boswell in his 70s and having recent health problems this might be a good year to turn it over to Fallon, who is a candidate that netroots progressives could get behind.

especially since IA will lose a CD (0.00 / 0)
after the next census. What's better, having Boswell retire in 2012 so we have no incumbent to run against Latham?

Or having Ed Fallon as an incumbent ready to fight and hold the seat?

I hope Ed does get in the race, and I will enthusiastically support him.

Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.


[ Parent ]
How Democratic a District Is This? (0.00 / 0)
It looks like George Bush won the district in 2004 and the district performed worse for Chet Culver in 2006 than Iowa's 4th District (which is a relatively safe Republican seat). What's the evidence that this is a safe enough Democratic seat that a primary challenge can be run against Boswell without risking a GOP pickup in November 2008?

USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox