Super Tuesday and Congressional Primaries

by: Matt Stoller

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 04:07


Even as Super Tuesday approaches, it's worth considering the impact of the primaries on lower ticket candidates.  Is the change message really that compelling on a primary level in Congressional races?  While Super-Tuesday may not conclusively end the Democratic nomination for President, it will conclusively show the results of a change message on  a more localized level.  We'll know the results Dan Lipinski-Mark Pera primary.  I put up some mailers from Women's Voices Women's Vote Action Fund on behalf of Pera, NARAL has done some, and so has the Center for Community Change.  Still, primaries are extremely costly and difficult, with Lipinski saying he votes with the Democrats 95% of the time, and third candidate Jerry Bennett potentially splitting the anti-Lipinski vote.  Pera's going to have to hope that the Obama vote comes out and comes out for him, which is quite possible.

In Maryland's fourth, Al Wynn has endorsed Barack Obama and is doing robocalls asking people to vote for Obama and Wynn on February 12.  I taped part of the robocall and put it up above in the youtube clip.  Obama voters tend to be more of Donna's base, but with a massive turnout, it's not clear who they will go for because it's a low information environment.  These are new primary voters, these are change voters, but have they heard about the candidates enough to make Donna the change vote?

And finally, we have Ed Fallon challenging Bush Dog Leonard Boswell in Iowa.  Boswell endorsed Clinton in the primary, an embarrassment showing he was out of step with his own constituents.  Ed Fallon, the progressive primary challenger, is generating good headlines, radio, and TV, while Boswell is doing standard message-testing with polling in district for the June primary.  Boswell has around $700k on hand, with about 74% of that coming from PACs, including your standard AT&T, Boeing, Conagra, Northrup Grumman, Lockheed Martin, the NRA, Raytheon, Verizon, and Walmart.  There's also a good amount of labor money, and a bunch from sitting members of Congress (including progressives), and most of the non-PAC money came from high dollar individuals.

Fallon says Boswell hurts Dems' long-term prospects (Des Moines Register)

Fallon: Iowa voters want change (Associated Press)

Fallon run sparks blogs (Des Moines Register)

Ed Fallon says Leonard Boswell's time is up in Third District seat">Ed Fallon says Leonard Boswell's time is up in Third District seat (The Daily Iowan)

Fallon says Boswell "status quo" politician who'll fail in "change" election (Radio Iowa)

Primaries are really expensive, and Leonard Boswell has a lot of cash.  The wild card here is whether outside groups will be a part of the race, and whether the overall change environment can impact lower ticket races.  We'll know more soon.

Matt Stoller :: Super Tuesday and Congressional Primaries

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Nader (0.00 / 0)
I saw an interview with Nader as he has started an "exploratory" committee to see what interest he can generate.

While I am no proponent of the "Hillary will certainly lose the general" theory of the Democratic primary, I do think an Obama campaign is better suited to rob Nader of his natural constituency of "both parties are the same" misguided leftists.

I really don't want to see a 2000 repeat where this notion that Hillary and McCain are "about the same" so people feel safe voting for Nader again to "teach the Democrats a lesson"

So I guess we'll see if Nader actually runs.  I strongly suspect if obama loses the nomination, his exploratory committee will be swamped with donations and interest.



Nader's constiuency (0.00 / 0)
He got less than 0.4% of the vote in 2004. I don't think he has a natural constituency left, unless one counts the lefty portion 1% of the electorate that always votes for third parties.  

[ Parent ]
I hope so (0.00 / 0)
2004 at least the contrast was pretty clear, if only because Bush was so obviously bad.  A McCain/Clinton race will reinvigorate the "both parties are the same" idiocy brigade.

But you're right that Nader has lost a lot of credibility and a lot of 2000 nader voters won't make that mistake again.  



[ Parent ]
Kick Fallon Some Cash (0.00 / 0)

Boswell may have money in the bank, but his ActBlue fundraising is a pitiful $102. Meanwhile Fallon is about to break $4,000 on ActBlue after just a couple of weeks of being in the race.  

Give to Fallon at ActBlue today.



Wynn's Robo Calls (0.00 / 0)
Is Obama aware that Wynn is making these calls?  Has Obama endorsed Wynn? I'm guessing the answer is no, yet the calls seem designed to make the voter think that he has.

Is there any recourse that the Obama campaign could take to force Wynn to stop?


Given that Obama has to win Maryland himself in eight days, (0.00 / 0)
I doubt it's worth his while to get involved in this.  Pissing off either side doesn't help him beat Clinton.  Specifically, pissing off Wynn would just turn Wynn's GOTV operation, which is currently in the highest gear it has ever reached, into a Hillary asset.  Why would he do that?

Answer: only if he wipes out Hillary tomorrow, which he won't (he won't "wipe her out" that is).  Failing that, he can't afford to get involved on Donna's behalf.  


[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox