Sierra Club versus Barbara Boxer

by: Matt Stoller

Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 00:43


Photo to the right is Boxer's fundraising appeal for Landrieu just after Landrieu provided the 41st vote for Bush against a historic green energy bill.
And the Al Wynn primary ripples begin.  Donna ran against the energy industry, with ads like this one and this one put up to the tune of a million dollars or so by her campaign and outside groups.  And now, one of those outside groups, the Sierra Club, is feeling emboldened to pursue a more aggressive approach on global warming and taking on Barbara Boxer in the process.

Carl Pope, head of the Sierra Club, has come out against Lieberman-Warner, Boxer's baby.  Here's how he compares the legislation with the Clean Air Act.

Fast-forward to present day: the carbon industries are lobbying to get a deal done this year that would give away carbon permits free of charge  to existing polluters -- bribing the sluggish, and slowing down innovation. And  politicians are telling us that while it would be better to auction these  permits and make polluters pay for putting carbon dioxide into our atmosphere, creating that market unfortunately gets in the way of the politics.

We are being urged to compromise -- to put a system in place  quickly, even if it is the wrong system.   Given that we only have one chance to get this right before it's too  late, our top priority must be to make sure that we do not settle prematurely  and sign a weak bill into law in the name of doing something about global warming.   With momentum for strong action and a friendlier Congress and White House building every day, it's no coincidence that some wish to settle their accounts now.

Kicking Wynn off Energy and Commerce immediately makes Congress friendlier, but significantly, it's the huge number of new liberal anti-carbon energy voters out there that are going to allow the public to get a sustainable deal on climate change next Congress.  There's some evidence that Obama might make global warming his highest priority, having promised to begin negotiating a new Kyoto-style treaty even before taking office.

All of this is excellent and game-changing news that we've seen happen in the last week or so.  As a reminder, here's what Boxer said just two weeks ago about Friends of the Earth, which has waged a campaign called 'Fix it or Ditch it' about the massive Lieberman-Warner bill to subsidize polluting industries.

"They're sort of the defeatist group out there," she said. "They've been defeatists from day one. And it's unfortunate. They're isolated among the environmental groups."

This nasty slur, while not true at the time (Greenpeace was opposing the bill), is now silly.  At least one big green group has moved in response to Wynn's loss to get a better deal, and the business right, the coal producers, the nuclear industry, and the oil guys know they will have to deal soon.  The Sierra Club and Friends of the Earth have said that we must work on global warming, but that it must be done smart and sustainably.

Good job, Donna.  And great job, Sierra Club, for your work putting her into office and making everyone in Congress look over their left shoulder.  I think it's pretty clear that primary challenges, while quite expensive upfront, are much more efficient than advocacy alone.

Matt Stoller :: Sierra Club versus Barbara Boxer

Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
HUGE News (0.00 / 0)
There is now really beginning to be a clear split among the green groups. Now on one side we have Environmental Defense, NRDC, politicians, and other corporate friendly groups and on the other side we've got Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth Sierra Club and activist groups like 1Sky and Step it up.

Sierra Club had been kind of in the middle. Now with this they are planting themselves firmly on the right side.

Hopefully their next target will be going big for Ed Fallon in IA-03. He started a environmental organization in Iowa and Boswell is almost as bad as Wynn. If LCV, Sierra Club, FoE PAC and others really step it up and go for that race and win those two primary victories would really send a message.

This probably isn't the right place to say this but to Matt, Chris and Mike. You should really get A Siegel blogging here on the front page. He has been a leader in the fight agaist Lieberman-Warner and is very sharp on this issue. I think he'd make a great addition.

John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power


why those weird photos (0.00 / 0)
they make it seem like Boxer and Landrieu are on the progressive side of this conflict.

and let me just get this in, because Boxer's statements have been jaw dropping... et tu Barbara? et tu?

Michael Bloomberg, prince of corporate welfare


Barbara Boxer?? Nuh-uh. (0.00 / 0)
You have a hard time ahead of you if you want to convince me to vote against Barbara Boxer.  I'll listen to the argument, but I can tell you right now, she's one of the few good things we have going in the Senate right now, a Senate full of spineless jellyfish.  

If they want to challenge a California senator, I'd be happier than hell to campaign against Dianne Feinstein when she comes up again, but she's not due yet.  I tried very hard to get somebody interested in running against her in 2006, even wrote a little primary-challenge progressive manifesto that got circulated around.  Feinstein and Harman we could do without.  

But Boxer?  You'll have to convince me.  One environmentalist bill won't do it.  We need to get out of Iraq.


Boxer is also pro LIEberman campaigned for him, defended him (0.00 / 0)
She also NEVER helped Lamont when he needed it. She is two-faced, and while not as bad as Feinstein, she faces an uphill battle in Calif. She better watch herself, she has lost alot of support, and had secretly been campaigning for Hillary whoie pretending to be neutral. She is close to being another lying hack like Feinstein. So...we shall see.

[ Parent ]
Global warming is the game changer (4.00 / 1)
Great depressions, disastrous wars etc pale into insignificance beside the implications of global warming.

You, and most people, don't get.

Imagine a hundred years from now, if the great plains are a great inland sea.  NYC like Venice (and Venice itself only existing in holiday videos).  The Great Barrier Reef gone.  The Amazon basin a desert.  Bangladesh gone, its people spread in a global diaspora.  Famine, drought and regional war on a scale never before seen.

US military incursions into Canada to secure water supplies.  Think that scenario is not being discussed in Washington?

Boxer is a twit.  Perhaps well-meaning, but our senators are just not very bright.  I suspect she is being conned by staffers with their eyes on their future careers as lobbyists.


[ Parent ]
The point (4.00 / 3)
is not that we need to primary BB. She obviously knows a lot about climate science, because her own bill, which she's not pushing for, is the best one yet proposed by anyone.

The point is that successful primary challenges (and I think Matt might be slightly overstating the effect of the Edwards race) have the potential to really embolden liberal interest groups not to just push for the best they think they can get right now, but to work strategically for what is actually needed.

If we can shoot down Lieberman Warner, and then pass something along the lines of Boxer-Sanders or one of the presidential proposals in 2009, I think Boxer will probably learn her lesson.

A whole lot of interest groups and politicians are being too cautious and settling too easily. Sierra Club is learning how to be more aggressive, and one of these days Boxer will too.

I support John McCain because children are too healthy anyway.


[ Parent ]
I read Atrios the other day ... (0.00 / 0)
talking about how Congress critters just don't believe in the same things we do .. well .. they represent us .. not corporations .. and the more we can get them to change behavior ... the better  

[ Parent ]
Hooray for the Sierra Club! (4.00 / 1)
The Sierra Club is probably the most democratic of the large environmental groups, with a large infrastructure of elected, volunteer-run committees which have real power.

Of course, this democracy sometimes means that a state chapter goes off-message, or that the club gets bashed by the media when some immigrant-hating nut runs for a position even though he loses in a blowout.

I'm a life member of the Sierra Club, and have never regretted it.


Great to see the Sierra Club doing this (0.00 / 0)
I used to be a member, but dropped out of the national because of some of their "bi-partisan" endorsements. Fortunately, they let a person belong to just the local chapter.

Can it happen here?

USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox