John Hagee-The Tip of A Very Explosive Iceberg?

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sat Mar 08, 2008 at 12:19


After writing about John Hagee's endorsement of John McCain last week, I was contacted by Sarah Posner, author of God's Profits: Faith Fraud, and the Republican Crusade for Values Voters, who also writes "The FundamentaList", a weekly blog at the American Prospect.  She sent me a review copy of her book, and if I ever stop pouring endless hours into vainly trying to post diaries here, I'll probably review it within the next two weeks.  But, in the meantime, she was interviewed on Democracy Now, and had several items about Hagee on her latest installment of "The FundamentaList".

The Democracy Now! piece was particularly strong, as it was set up by some clips that are-of course-better heard than read in transcript.  Russert badgering Obama about Farrakhan, for example.  And McCain proudly embracing Hagee.  Then, in the interview itself, Amy strated right off, asking Sarah just who this Hagee fellow is:

SARAH POSNER: Well, his church has been around since the early 1970s. He actually started it after a previous church went out of business, so to speak, after he divorced his first wife. And he has built this church that he has now, Cornerstone Church, to 19,000 members.

Hagee preaches the Prosperity Gospel, which essentially says that God wants believers to be rich, that you-believers can call riches into existence for themselves through their faith, and that you get rich by tithing to your pastor ten percent of your income, what Hagee calls your "first fruits," meaning pay him your tithe before you pay the rent, before you make the car payment.

Gosh! Divorced first wife? Prosperity Gospel?  Is this a match made in Heaven or what?  And you thought BushCo had made parody obsolete!  The M$M doesn't like to talk about McCain's first mariage and divorce, you see.  It makes him look like Newt Gingrich.  Heck, it almost makes Gingrish look good!

But, back to Hagee, on the flip....

Paul Rosenberg :: John Hagee-The Tip of A Very Explosive Iceberg?
The Democracy Now inteview continued:

[SARAH POSNER]: Hagee also, as you alluded to in the opening, is a Christian Zionist. He b believes that God foretells-or the Bible foretells events in the Middle East that will lead to the Second Coming of Jesus. And he believes that all Middle East policy is dictated by this prophecy in the Bible. And so, he thinks all of these events are inevitable. He thinks that the United States should militarily attack Iran to preempt its nuclear ambitions and that this is all part of God's plan to bring about Armageddon and the Second Coming.

AMY GOODMAN: Can you talk about his attitude to Iran, Sarah Posner?

SARAH POSNER: He believes that Ahmadinejad is the next Hitler, the Hitler of the twenty-first century. He believes that Ahmadinejad's goal is to wipe out Israel and the Jewish people and that by not confronting Ahmadinejad militarily, we are enabling him like Chamberlain enabled Hitler. So they make a lot of historical allusions to World War II. He often talks about World War III coming to pass. And he believes all of this-he finds all of this in his Bible. He believes that everything in the world, be it a financial transaction or foreign policy issues, are all animated by spiritual warfare, meaning war, spiritual war and actual war, between forces backed by God and forces backed by Satan.

Hmmm. I wonder which side won in his divorce?

AMY GOODMAN: I was in San Antonio in 2006. It was the time of the Night to Honor Israel at the Cornerstone Church. Can you talk-

SARAH POSNER: I was there, as well.

AMY GOODMAN: Sorry?

SARAH POSNER: I was there, as well.

AMY GOODMAN: Can you talk about who was there and this combination of politics and religion? Just describe the scene for us.

SARAH POSNER: Well, there were obviously a lot of members of Hagee's church there, but also members of the Jewish community in San Antonio, former and present Israeli government officials, prominent members of national Jewish organizations, and they all converged on the stage at Cornerstone Church to, what Hagee believed was, quote-unquote, "honor" Israel. And this included speeches, songs sung by Hagee's Cornerstone Church Choir. They sang "Hava Nagila" Texas-style. They showed videos of Jerusalem, where the Dome of the Rock was omitted from the scenery, because, of course, for Hagee, that would be part of the Second Coming, that the Temple Mount in Jerusalem would be controlled by Jesus and not-this is one of the reasons why he's opposed to a two-state solution or the sharing of Jerusalem between Jews and Muslims, because he believes that God gave it to the Jews and that that presages the Second Coming of Christ.

So it was a remarkable combination of his eschatology and wrapped into the realpolitiks of the Middle East. And this is a big reason why McCain does not want to back away from Hagee, because all of this Middle East politics is very, very charged, and Hagee, even though he's very controversial within the Jewish community, there are many within the Jewish community who openly embrace him and welcome his, quote-unquote, "support" of Israel.

And you thought the neocons were crazy!

Oh, wait, these are the neocons!

AMY GOODMAN: The whole issue of the neoconservatives and Hagee's church and John Hagee himself, like former CIA Director James Woolsey, a featured speaker-

SARAH POSNER: Right.

AMY GOODMAN: Talk about Douglas Feith, Woolsey, where they fit into John Hagee's politics and religion.

SARAH POSNER: Well, they-someone like Woolsey came and spoke at what was called the Middle East intelligence briefing that was part of that same weekend in San Antonio for the Night to Honor Israel. And Hagee will bring in people like Woolsey to speak about Middle East politics, about terrorism, about counterterrorism, and it adds sort of this patina of authenticity or reliability to Hagee's really outlandish view of the Bible dictating current events.

And so, when he had his event, CUFI event, here in Washington last summer, even more people within the foreign policy community and Congress, were there to basically bless what he was saying, including John McCain. Joe Lieberman compared Hagee-at that event, compared Hagee to Moses. Roy Blunt, the House Minority Whip, said that CUFI was part of God's plan. And so, he's gotten a stamp of approval by people inside the Beltway, in Congress.

During that same trip, or I think maybe it was the CUFI event the year before, in 2006, Hagee and some other officials with CUFI had a meeting with Elliott Abrams, who is the head of Middle East policy for Bush's national security team. So they're very connected within the foreign policy community and particularly the neoconservative foreign policy community, because their eschatology fits so nicely with the neocon foreign policy agenda.

So, you can just imagine how bad all of this would look if those involved were actually questioned about what the hell they're doing.  Bogus intelligence is one thing, but consorting with someone who is rooting for the end of the world....

AMY GOODMAN: You write about the 2000 film, Left Behind, based on the blockbuster novel by Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins, that has Hagee and his wife there.

SARAH POSNER: Right. You know, in those books, when the Rapture happens, believers are whisked away to Heaven, and everybody else is left here to struggle through the Tribulation period before Jesus defeats the Antichrist. And so, there's a scene in that movie where-on an airplane, where all of a sudden the people left on the airplane realize that everyone else has been whisked away to Heaven. And so, in one shot, you see Hagee and his wife sitting together on the airplane reading a book or enjoying some conversation, or what have you, and then the next moment they're gone.

Now, what would it look like, if Russert were to do the folowing to McCain?

TIM RUSSERT: On Sunday, the headline in your hometown paper, Chicago Tribune: "Louis Farrakhan Backs Obama for President at Nation of Islam Convention in Chicago." Do you accept the support of Louis Farrakhan?

     SEN. BARACK OBAMA: You know, I have been very clear in my denunciation of Minister Farrakhan's anti-Semitic comments. I think that they are unacceptable and reprehensible. I did not solicit this support. He expressed pride in an African American who seems to be bringing the country together. I obviously can't censor him, but it is not support that I sought. And we're not doing anything, I assure you, formally or informally with Minister Farrakhan.

     TIM RUSSERT: Do you reject his support?

     SEN. BARACK OBAMA: Well, Tim, you know, I can't say to somebody that he can't say that he thinks I'm a good guy. You know, I-you know, I have been very clear in my denunciations of him and his past statements, and I think that indicates to the American people what my stance is on those comments.

     TIM RUSSERT: The problem some voters may have is, as you know, Reverend Farrakhan called Judaism "gutter religion."

     SEN. BARACK OBAMA: Tim, I think-I am very familiar with his record, as are the American people. That's why I have consistently denounced it. This is not something new. This is something that-I live in Chicago. He lives in Chicago. I've been very clear, in terms of me believing that what he has said is reprehensible and inappropriate. And I have consistently distanced myself from him.

Well, of course, they'd have to run twenty-some years of coverage highlighting Hagee's bigotry first, in order to make him radioactive.  But they're never going to do that.

And then there's the whole Mammon side of the God-And-Mammon Party:

AMY GOODMAN: What about [Sen. Charles] Grassley's investigation of televangelists-not Hagee-but that include Kenneth Copeland, who supported Mike Huckabee?

SARAH POSNER: Right. Senator Grassley is investigating whether six televangelists, who preach a similar prosperity message to Hagee, wrongly used tax-exempt donor funds for a non-exempt use. So, looking at luxury cars, huge mansions, private jets that these televangelists have, Grassley is asking questions, in his capacity to oversee the IRS and tax-exempt organizations, whether they were misusing or exploiting their tax-exempt status for their own personal gain.

Now, many of the televangelists under investigation have denounced Grassley's investigation as an unwarranted intrusion into Church affairs, including Copeland. He was quite explicit about that. And Grassley has actually also been denounced by-even by Christians who do not necessarily embrace the Prosperity Gospel, but who also believe that it's a slippery slope of the government intruding into Church affairs. But Grassley has been very clear that he's not investigating Church doctrine, that he's just looking into whether the tax-exempt policy is operating correctly in this circumstance.

In short, Hagee is someone far, far worse than Louis Farrakhan, not to mention much, much more powerful.

Which is why the media backed off so quickly from dealing with him.

But this isn't going away.  The fractures and ruptures within the conservtive coalition are not being papered over with triumphant successes anymore.   And the Catholic demogauges like Bill Donohue are not going away any time soon.

The Versailles media may not want to touch any part of this story any more than Superman wants to touch kryptonite.  But were not in Kansas anymore.  Were in YouTube land:

And it's a loooong way 'till November.


Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Interesting Note from the Boys and Girls on the Bus (4.00 / 1)
I was talking to a reporter who was traveling with McCain when the Hagee endorsement/appearance took place. As they wheeled their way to the Holy Place, journalists were asking, "Who's John Hagee? What's this all about? Why are we going there?"

Now, there was the usual crowd of Very Important Northeastern Reporters on this trip, the very arbiters of, well, everything political and cultural. They are the top of the heap. They didn't have a clue about Hagee.

One interesting side note:  they did all have wireless cards, and so they started googling Hagee before they arrived. So they had a little background before they got there. Setting aside the McCain narrative they're all stuck in, I was intrigued by this last bit, realtime research on the bus, making them all a little more up to speed than they at first were.



How did they not know (0.00 / 0)
Who Hagee is? I'd even heard of the guy and I'm a good-for-nothing slacker. Glenn, have you ever started a 527? I think maybe we should start a group to help educate the press and the rest of America as to who John W. McBush is getting cozy with.

[ Parent ]
Yes, in 2004 (4.00 / 1)
In 2004 I founded Texans for Truth to answer the swift-boaters and expose Bush's military record. I just settled the FEC case after the do-gooders filed against all the 527s from 2004. I think the dust has settled a bit, and the rules are bit clearer (I'd done exactly what the lawyers told me to do, and it was still a nightmare), but I think I'll let somebody else take the point this time.

[ Parent ]
How expensive (0.00 / 0)
Can those groups get? My worry is I, on my part-time college job budget won't be able to afford starting one up without big donors or backers.

[ Parent ]
The Hagee - Farrakhan equation (4.00 / 1)
Completely apart from the man-love in the media for John McCain as a person and a candidate, and general deference to Republicans as the Daddy party of seriousness, as well as the issue of Farrakhan as the avatar of the scary black man, I strongly suspect that there is a real reluctance in the media to come anywhere near examining the substance of a guy like Hagee. To seriously and critically examine at this guy's end-times belief would likely be portrayed as an attack on all of Christianity. Even if Hagee is a fringe of the evangelical movement (it's not clear to me that he is, but what do I know about these guys?), any examination of one would probably lead to a huge reaction from the rest of this community, especially given how they already feel aggrieved by the MSM. Given that, the media will continue to play this very carefully, unlike, say, Farrakhan, whom they can trash with impunity. (Note: not defending Farrakhan, just noting the asymmetry.)

What's striking (4.00 / 2)
is how Obama was hammered on Farrakhan when he never once sought out his support, and "denounced and rejected" him.  Yet, when McCain enthusiastically embraces Hagee's support, who is just as much of a bigot, and much more dangerous, the media yawns.  You don't Farrakhan being granted audiences with key lawmakers to discuss US foreign policy.

It isn't even that the two incidents are equivalent and the media is giving McCain a pass.  McCain actively sought out the support of Hagee, whereas Obama was tarred because Obama is black, and Farrakhan is black, Muslim and hates Jews, and some wackos persist in thinking Obama is a Muslim who hates Israel. I guess because Hagee's white and Christian, and McCain has that maverick, kick-ass spirit, no one cares.

Not defending Farrakhan either, but the media treatment of the two stories has been atrocious.


[ Parent ]
Well, This Is the Rightwing Frame They've Accepted For 35 Years (0.00 / 0)
The religious right has no compunction whatsoever about attacking someone else's beliefs.  But someone one can't even raise a peep about theirs.  And believe me, theirs would not hold up to much scrutiny, which is just part of why they're so hysterical on the subject.

My point on this subject, here, is that the M$M is probably not going to be able to do this this time, in part because it's rightwing religious bigot on rightwing religious bigot, so siding with the rightwing religious bigot is not going to settle anything this time out.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
Bill Moyers Journal -- Must See (0.00 / 0)
He devoted this week's show to the McCain-Hagee connection. It's instructive to watch how Hagee switches between a mainstream rightwing position (if that's not an oxymoron) when he's courting the GOP base, then back to all-out insane apocalyptic  endtimer when he's doing his "religious" act. Also to see slightly surprising figures like Frank Gaffney and Joe Lieberman giving Hagee and his cult their unstinting support and approval.

And McCain's pathetic attempt to distance himself from Hagee while not alienating his cult -- a totally sharp contrast with Obama's straight talk when he rejected Farrakhan's statements with no equivocation. McCain's new best friend is a guy who says Hurricane Katrina was sent by God because they were planning a gay pride parade in New Orleans -- and the best McCain can do is say that nobody agrees with everything every supporter says -- but he doesn't favor us with any specific examples of where he might part company with Hagee.

The show also includes Reason magazine editor Matt Welch and former GOP congressman Mickey Edwards discussing how McCain, Bush, and the current GOP have betrayed real conservatism. I thought their critique was actually more telling than most of what the liberals have managed so far.

If you want people to understand what McCain is really all about, get them to watch this above all. It's fair, unflinching, and brilliant video. As far as I'm concerned, Sicko said all that needs to be said about healthcare in the US. This report does the same for McCain and his bedmates.


Uh, Yeah. Thanks1 (0.00 / 0)
I was originally going to include some material from that, before my losing fight with SoapBlox this morning.  Then I spaced out saying anything at all.

But I wouldn't say that it says everything.  It says enough, that's for sure.  But there is much, much more where all that comes from.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
Here's a 90-second summary of McCain & Hagee... (0.00 / 0)

Pass it around.

The punchline is this - in the 2000 primaries John McCain criticized George W. Bush for courting the political support of Bob Jones, and McCain's campaign, in the Michigan primary, made robo-calls telling voters Bush was anti-Catholic.

Called on this tactic, McCain said - and this was recorded by Fox News, that if he were invited to Bob Jones, he, John McCain, would tell Bob Jones "Get out of the 16th Century and into the 21st Century. What you're doing is racist and cruel".

McCain proceded to say that he would NEVER do such a thing (pander to someone like Jones to get political support).

John Hagee's views are similar enough to those of Jones to merit the charge : McCain, in accepting Hagee's endorsement, chose the 16th Century.


Here's a 90-second summary of McCain & Hagee... (0.00 / 0)

Actually here it is - that was on old version.

Enjoy.


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox