Independent Ethics Panel- Important Accomplishment

by: Mike Lux

Wed Mar 12, 2008 at 12:19


Given the complete and utterly appalling failure of the Congressional ethics committees to do anything to police members in the recent tidal wave of Congressional corruption, it is great to see the House finally pass a measure creating an independent ethis panel. Through all the blatant corruption of the past few years- Abramoff, DeLay, Cunningham, Jefferson, Ney, Doolittle, Renzi, Foley, Craig, Vitter, Sherwood, Gibbons, Lewis, Weldon, Frist, Burns, Sweeney, and God knows who else I'm forgetting or that we don't know about yet- the ethics committees have done virtually nothing. And members of both parties have liked it that way.

A friend of mine who consults for a Congresswoman, whom I can't name or my friend will get in trouble, told this consultant to back off on helping me push ethics reform in the 2006 election because "she liked going on junkets." Pelosi came under enormous pressure to back off on pushing this bill, and had to keep the voting machines open to round up the votes. And members of Congress were blatant in their attacks on it: Congressman Tiahrt said, "If you have a single ounce of self-preservation, you'll vote no."

Getting this done yesterday was a good thing. Pelosi and the groups that kept pushing on this in the face of really intense opposition deserve a round of applause.

Mike Lux :: Independent Ethics Panel- Important Accomplishment

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
It does seem good news (0.00 / 0)
Especially given how strenuously and personally it was fought by the usual suspects.  

It's too bad things like this which contribute to quiet honest governance get so little credit.  

It's also the kind of thing that a future Republican majority will quietly do away with and the public won't notice.

When it roasts its first democrat, we'll know it is working.


Well, while technically unrelated (0.00 / 0)
Spitzer's getting caught and resigning can't help but remind voters of how Dems deal with ethical scandals vs. Pubs--i.e. they acknowledge their seriousness and take appropriate and swift action. This may be as much due to political considerations as genuine ethical concern, but no matter, the outcome is the same--Dems do the right thing, and Pubs don't.

Also, I'm seeing on Tweety right now that Ferraro is leaving the Clinton campaign. Kudos to them for doing the right thing. Note how Obama fired Power almost instantly when she stepped out of line. Yet McCain continues to love him some Hagee. I realize that these don't technically fall under this new ethics panel, but they do fall within the ethical sphere, and as such, show how Dems vs. Pubs deal with ethical matters in general.

Not even close. Not even the same universe.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


[ Parent ]
This can and should be a top issue for Dems (0.00 / 0)
in the election. Not just for Obama, who sponsored the senate ethics bill (which is different from this panel, but in the same overall vein of ethical reform pushed through by Dems), vs. the massively ethically-challenged McCain (Keating, Abramoff/Marianas, now this tanker deal), but for Dems challenging Pub incumbents in congress and the senate. Lots of Abramoff, Halliburton and Blackwater-connected Pubs to go after, I'm sure. Dems ought to hire David Walker as their chief counsel or senior advisor in what are sure to be round the clock (and yes, partly politically motivated) ethical hearings this summer.

In addition to Iraq and the economy, this should be a top issue this fall. Plus, it's just good policy. Enough living high on the hog on the taxpayer dole.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox