Children and Gas Mileage

by: Matt Stoller

Mon Jul 30, 2007 at 10:29


Last Monday, I wrote that there were two big fights in Congress to look out for, the reauthorization of poor children's health insurance and an increase in fuel efficiency standards.  Both are cake.  Easy.  Progressive stuff.  Popular.  One looks like it will pass and one looks like it won't.  Children will get insured, but we aren't near dealing with global warming.  It's a pretty standard brew, actually, with Steny Hoyer and other conservative Democrats all in favor of spending money.
Matt Stoller :: Children and Gas Mileage
In the gas mileage fight, it was Dingell versus Markey and Pelosi, and it looks like Dingell is coming out on top. (h/t Grist)

Both Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) and Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman John Dingell (D-Mich.) told reporters earlier this week that CAFE likely will not be part of the summer energy package.

But environmental groups and other advocates of the Markey bill are continuing to press for a vote next week and say they believe they can pick up enough support to pass the legislation.

"We are working on the expectation that it will come up next week," said Dan Becker, a CAFE expert with the Sierra Club. "We're working to get the votes, and I think we will win them in time to get a vote."

Auto industry representatives -- who backed an alternate version put together by moderate Democrats and Republicans -- also say they have received no indication that CAFE is off the table for next week's debate.

A face-saving compromise is likely here, one that concedes to Dingell's wishes.  On insuring poor kids, it looks like the votes are there in the Senate.  The Republicans are probably going to swap lots of amendments in there to try to prevent an increase of SCHIP funding, and if they succeed it'll be because Harry Reid packed the schedule in hopes that Democrats can avoid being called the 'do nothing Congress'.  And a Bush veto looms.

I don't have a moral of the story here.  It's just an update.


Tags: , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
a question (0.00 / 0)
this may seem very naive, but isn't it to the auto industry's long-term advantage to produce more fuel efficient cars, since that's the general direction of consumer preference (and necessity)?  I just don't understand the opposition to increasing fuel economy standards.

short term (0.00 / 0)
Management thinks only of the short-term because of compensation structures, and the United Autoworkers does whatever management wants.

[ Parent ]
a sad state of affairs then, no? (n/t) (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Log Rolling Mileage and Health Insurance (0.00 / 0)
May be, the congressional leadership should log roll health care reform and mileage standards.  If the automobile industry gets a break in health care costs then it should be able to absorb the mileage.

I know that I am day dreaming but wouldn't it be sweet if individual states could opt into Medicare as single payer health insurance?  Michigan would probably join immediately to protect its automobile industry.  That in turn would create considerable pressure in Southern states with automobile manufacturing plants.


health care for hybrids (0.00 / 0)
That's actually Obama's plan, which would offer health insurance assistance from the Federal government in return for fuel efficiency boosts.  The answer from auto companies and the UAW is no.  I don't know why.

[ Parent ]
Its almost like (0.00 / 0)
Detroit is pathologically suicidal.  They are determined to march down the path that AMC took.  They'll give us (car buyers) what they want us to have and if we don't like...they'll go outta business.

Its really stupid.  Decades of inbred management.  No ability to see the long term.  No desire to change. 


[ Parent ]
SCHIP under veto threat (0.00 / 0)
The Baucus bill (being originated by Finance) is - my understanding - pretty much a bipartisan affair. The House bill (HR 3162) is very much not, apparently.

I suspect that GOP senators may be happy to let Bush take the heat for stymieing the bill: why GOP reps don't do the same, I don't know.


This fight isn't over (0.00 / 0)
Until it's over.  It is very complex.  CAFE may be added in conference, or later.  Pelosi has many arrows in her quiver.  She also knows very well how important these issues are in CA.

John McCain--He's not who you think he is.

good points (0.00 / 0)
There's a lot of horse-trading going on with renewable electriticy standards in there as well.

[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox