Thank you

by: Dick Durbin

Wed Aug 01, 2007 at 08:15


Hello, I'm Dick Durbin. I want to take this opportunity to say a final thanks to all of you who took part in the first stage of our interactive bill writing process last week. In particular, I'd like to thank Jim Baller, Paul Morris, John Windhausen, Andrew McNeill, and Waldo McMillan for their participation on Friday evening, as well as the numerous other experts who participated over the course of the week.

The last week has given me a great deal to think about. I figured at the outset that if I gave the broader public a chance to comment on these issues, a few good ideas would emerge. I was wrong.  What I found instead was a significant number of well-reasoned perspectives and ideas that I had not previously considered.  These ideas covered the gamut of policy areas, including net neutrality, incentive programs, spectrum policy, and community broadband. 

(More in 'there's more'...)

Dick Durbin :: Thank you
In addition to the importance of the policy ideas you generated, the first stage of our Legislation 2.0 experiment demonstrated the potential of this innovative, democratic, and transparent legislative process.  The online community proved to me that there is a significant interest in more transparency in legislating and that we have the technology to make this process more practical and convenient than ever before. 

To my knowledge, this was the first time that participants spread thousands of miles apart were brought together for the express purpose of crafting federal legislation.  By all accounts, I believe that we were successful.  My challenge now is to incorporate the ideas you've shared into a piece of federal legislation.  Once drafted, I'll be posting legislation online and will ask for your input once again. 

Thank you again for all of your help.  We'll be in touch shortly. 


Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Thank you | 7 comments
Thank you (4.00 / 1)
This is the best illustration of what many bloggers have known for years-- its common knowledge on sites like Daily Kos that if you throw out a policy problem or legal question you will get an incredible array of answers. 

Thank you for doing this and I hope there are other policy areas in which this interactive process can be used.


An Idea For Next Time--There Is Going To Be A Next Time, Right? (4.00 / 1)
I'd like to suggest adding another piece to the process.  The gap between gathering ideas and crafting legislation can be a big one.  One thing that can help fill in that gap would be a deliberative process to help identify what guiding principles have strong support that stands up even in the face of strong counter-arguments.

What I'm thinking of is something along the lines of the model developed by James Fishman, known as "deliberative polling".

I'm not suggesting that you try to incorporate this into the process of drafting this current legislation.  You're already taking a big first step in a new direction.  But I am suggesting that you look at how the use of deliberative polling could make the process even stronger in the future.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


No, thank you (4.00 / 1)
As a constituent I'm proud that you've shown the savvy and flexibility to help pioneer an effort like this. I believe it will be a doorway to a new kind of American democratic process.

Only one caveat: I hope you can come back with an account of how the basic ideas for legislation are forming in your mind before you present the final legislation. Let the interactivity continue before the deal is done.


I agree with DaveW (4.00 / 1)
I'd like to second DaveW's suggestion that you provide us with some sense of where you're going with your legislative proposals before you present something detailed and final.  Not only would we appreciate that, but I think it will help you and your staff to get a second round of our input as you begin to flesh out the issues you think most need to be addressed and how.

Thanks again Senator Durbin.


[ Parent ]
Opening the process to non-lobbyists (4.00 / 2)
Senator,

Much thanks for the participation of yourself and your staff last week. It made possible a fascinating discussion of some important public policy.

The public's voice can barely be hear over the din of big money interests and their lobbyists.  The people you heard from last week have limited time and limited resources, especially in comparison, but represent together far more people.  Getting those voices heard, not just for this issue, but on any issue, is arguably the biggest challenge the US faces as a democratic republic.

Sites like these are a megaphone for those voices, and I hope you and other members of congress continue to make use of them.


pubic participation technical infrastructure (4.00 / 1)
Thank you Sen. Durbin & Staffers.  I think this is a dynamite idea and probably the next stage in the "web 2.0" technical direction.  I'm interested in new technologies which make such public discourse more manageable for legislative staffers, representatives. 

Let's build the new cyber town square in so many words.

NoSlaves.com  


The Economic Populist


Thanks for the opportunity (4.00 / 1)
I have become convinced that, with clear guidelines and a civil tone, the Internet has enormous potential to be a resource that helps all kinds of people solve problems collboratively.

I respect, admire, and appreciate your efforts to use this technology in the process of working on the legislation that will legally constrain its use.  I look forward to updates. 

Thanks once again to OpenLeft for hosting.


Thank you | 7 comments
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox