Obama Stands Up to Bush, Big Media

by: Matt Stoller

Fri May 16, 2008 at 10:56


John Eggerton at Broadcasting and Cable has the story.

The fight over the Federal Communications Commission's Dec. 18 media-ownership vote set up a potential battle between the current president and a senator who wants to be the next one.
Barack Obama

Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) Thursday urged the House to follow the Senate's lead and pass a resolution of disapproval, an unusual legislative maneuver that would invalidate the FCC's decision to allow TV and radio stations and newspapers to be co-owned in the top 20 markets, subject to some conditions.

After the Senate approved the measure, Obama, a co-sponsor of the bill, released a statement saying, "I urge my colleagues in the House of Representatives to expeditiously pass the legislation."

He framed the vote, as he has before, as standing up to "Washington special interests," a campaign theme. "Our nation's media market must reflect the diverse voices of our population, and it is essential that the FCC promotes the public interest and diversity in ownership," he said.

The FCC decision to consolidate yet more media was opposed by 99% of public comments.  As Paul Rosenberg noted in this comments, this might be the single least popular decision by the Bush administration ever.  But Obama, as he did with his media and tech plan, took this further, and called for diversity and representation for the public interest in media ownership.

With ownership levels for minorities and women in media in the low single digits, Obama is really saying that it's time to reshape our media system.  In discussing Reagan, one of the great conservative media reformers, remember he made the following comment.

"I didn't' say I liked Ronald Reagan's policies," Obama explained. "What I said was that was the kind of working majority we need to form in order to move a progressive agenda forward."

With the Pentagon Pundit scandal coming on the wave of a number of serious breakdowns of the public legitimacy of the press, the public desire for a new media system is strong.  The technological capacity to create such a system exists, in fact, media has been dramatically reshaped already through the internet.  Broadcast media, though, is still somewhat untouched, but this kind of serious structural argument about the media from the likely President is something that cable and broadcast executives, as well as progressives, should take very seriously.  

I've heard quite frequently from political operatives that this race is not Obama versus McCain, but Obama versus the media.  And it's clear that without breaking down the structure of the media conglomerates, public discourse will remain as polluted and dishonest as it is now.  And so President Obama is telegraphing his intentions to be a media reformer.  Now it's up to us to help him get there.

Matt Stoller :: Obama Stands Up to Bush, Big Media

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
The Rev Wright was a pre-emptive Dean Scream dream (4.00 / 2)
for the CorpoRat/State media.

Dean wasn't even the presumptive nominee when the SCUM (SoCalledUnbiasedMedia) attacked him after mentioned that he, as president, would merely "look at" re-instituting media regulations either cancelled or permitted to lapse during the Bushevik Fascist anshutz, and immediately became the object of almost continuous obloquy, snark and exaggeration...


And still to this day .. (0.00 / 0)
I rarely see it mentioned that Peter Jennings admitted that the TradMed did a hatchet job on Dean ... that they were indeed out to get him

[ Parent ]
"And so President Obama is telegraphing his intentions to be a media reformer." (0.00 / 0)
This is a first for me, and it pleases me.
"And so President Obama is telegraphing his ...."

Of course, on the meat of the matter, the fact that he is moving so soon, is a huge boost to his leadership, a huge boost to Democratic Party confidence, a huge boost to America.
And a huge boost to my confidence that we are moving in the right direction with all due speed. Change, we can believe in.  

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


Wow (0.00 / 0)
Truly he IS the Kwisatz Haderach!

[ Parent ]
It gives one Hope(tm) (0.00 / 0)
its certainly a great great thing to finally hear someone with some power say those bolded words. Please please please let him reverse just half the consolidation damage done sine Reagan. It would be a miracle on earth if he reversed everything completely.

So, um, how do we help him get there?

Michael Bloomberg, prince of corporate welfare


A good start would be to reverse Clinton's damage! (4.00 / 1)
This is probably the main reason I chose BO over HRC. So important- it's obviously the filter through which every other issue must pass, as far as the mainstream goes.

[ Parent ]
the Merge! (0.00 / 0)
I've read that a possible pick of a Clinton crony for Obama's number 2 may be used to "appease" Clinton into going away. My choice of Phrase is more accurate that when it was used by Bush to disparage our next Presidents goal of "Speaking softly but carrying the worlds biggest, baddest, stick history has ever seen"-into negotiations.

But I digress-

It would be a huge mistake to see a Clinton crony as anything other than a mole placed close to Obama, feeding info to the wannabe President so she can load her guns and take another crack at the pinata in 2012, before she's too old.

Obama will be very, very busy cleaning up the mess left by lil' Bush and friends and at times will be vulnerable to a blindside. it's times like those when your back must be covered.

So please, please, Don't let a snake into the house that Change built!    


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox