Clinton's Edge in Some State General Election Polls

by: HalLew

Wed May 21, 2008 at 15:02


There are lots of great posts concerning state polling for the upcoming General Election such as Chris' just begun Presidential Forecast.  A topic I have been thinking about is how much better Clinton seems to do against McCain than Obama in some state polls.  A recent example is the NC SUSA poll, and people like Jerome at MyDD like to cite such polls as evidence that the Dems are picking the wrong (weaker) candidate.  Jerome's point is largely irrelevant - Obama is the nominee and whining that your candidate would be doing better in General Election polls only serves to weaken the Dem cause.  But the NC SUSA poll raises some other interesting questions.  

The first question that comes to mind, which is about as irrelevant as Jerome's whining: Does anyone think Clinton would be polling so well in places like NC if she were the nominee?  Looking at the internals of the NC SUSA poll, it is clear that women are the primary difference.  They support Clinton 56-37 over McCain, yet they support McCain 47-46 over Obama.  That is a 20-point swing towards McCain.  From my perspective, as an Obama supporter, this seems like sour grapes.  The differences between Obama and Clinton are minor compared to the difference between either Dem and McCain and I cannot for the life of me explain why some one who supports Clinton would vote for McCain against Obama.  Thus, I believe that if these women truly bought into Clinton's message, then they will also buy into Obama's message.  Back to the question: would Clinton would be polling so well in places like NC if she were the nominee, or do people think there would be Obama supporters telling pollsters that they will vote McCain rather than Clinton.  The most talked about constituency of Obama's base is African Americans and they break 89-7 Obama/McCain and 74-9 Clinton/McCain in SUSA's NC poll.  While this does represent a 17-point difference in favor of Obama in a match up with McCain, I wouldn't call it a swing to McCain like the female vote.  For the women, there is 7% other/undecided in both Obama/McCain and Clinton/McCain matchups.  Ten percent of NC women are truly telling SUSA that they would vote for Clinton in a Clinton/McCain contest, but they would vote for McCain in a Obama/McCain contest (note there is a statistically insignificant 1-point difference for men: 41% for Clinton and 40% for Obama).  For African Americans there is 4% other/undecided in the Obama/McCain match-up, but 17% other/undecided in the Clinton/McCain match-up.  The subgroup of African Americans who support Obama, but not Clinton, largely fall into the other/undecided category. If Clinton were the nominee I am sure these African Americans would support her.  However, if she were the current presumptive nominee, after all of the racist rhetoric that has come out of her camp, do people think African Americans would still be telling pollsters that they wouldn't vote for McCain, or would we see something like a 15-20 point support for McCain among African Americans?  I think it would be the latter and thus Clinton's impressive 8-point lead over McCain in NC would shrink substantially.  

While thinking about the first question, a second, and I think much more relevant question came to mind: Who are the 10% of women who are telling SUSA that they would vote for Clinton over McCain but McCain over Obama?  This is a question that could be looked at from two ends of the political spectrum.  We could view these women as conservatives who generally vote Republican in federal elections, and they simply refuse to vote for a black man for President.  On the other end of the spectrum we could view these women as Clinton's most diehard supporters, currently very depressed and frustrated at losing a close contest, believing that the Obama campaign has belittled Clinton, possibly believing the Obama campaign has been sexist, and as a result of all of this telling SUSA they will vote McCain over Obama.  The optimist in me believes the latter.  Since, as I said earlier, the differences between Obama and Clinton are minor compared to the difference between either Dem and McCain, to believe the former is to believe that 10% of NC women are racists (while apparently none of the NC men are), and I cannot be persuaded to believe that.  Thus, I believe that a large portion of these women who are currently telling SUSA they will vote for Clinton over McCain but McCain over Obama will ultimately vote for Obama.  It will be interesting to see if future polls show this to be true.  

HalLew :: Clinton's Edge in Some State General Election Polls

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Has it occurred to you that the women in NC are Republicans (0.00 / 0)
who would vote for her and for the first women president....So it's not sour grapes...it's pride in her...while they don't feel that way about Obama.

I always said lots of Republican women would vote for her if she were the nominee.

the sour grapes here is the inablility of Obama supporters to see that she has a positive pull on voters....that just like Obama she is the historic candidate...it constantly belittles the role and ambitions of women...You can't imagine that she's that motivating

"Incrementalism isn't a different path to the same place, it could be a different path to a different place"
Stoller


Yes, that occurred to me... (0.00 / 0)
That is why I specifically said: "We could view these women as conservatives who generally vote Republican in federal elections."  I guess that is not explicitly saying that women in NC are Republican - but it is making that point with very strong implicit language.  

I'm sorry that my sour grapes comment has insulted you.  If the opposite situation were currently happening - Clinton was the presumptive nominee and Obama supporters were telling pollsters they would vote for McCain in the GE over Clinton - I would be saying Obama supporters had sour grapes.  Also, I would not be such a person - I would happily support Clinton (I just like Obama more).  I would also be asking aloud whether Obama supporters were sexist or just terribly upset and likely to change their mind once the primary was officially over (like I'm now asking if some Clinton supporters are racist or just terribly upset and likely to change their mind once the primary is officially over).  

One of the points I tried to make was that I don't think the 10% of women in NC telling SUSA they will vote Clinton over McCain but McCain over Obama are all Rs.  There is very little difference between Clinton's and Obama's messages.  Sure, a little different on the war (I like Obama's stance more), a little different on healthcare (I like Clinton's stance more), but compared to McCain they are exactly the same.  I said in my original post that to say these 10% of NC women are Republicans is to say they are racist (and I don't believe this is the case).  If I interpret you correclty, you are saying I am wrong and instead of being Republicans who are racist, they are Republicans who are so motivated by a woman candidate that given a set of beliefs they disagree with (beliefs shared by Clinton and Obama) they can be persuaded to vote against their beliefs based on the gender of the candidate.  I'm not sure which is more insulting to this 10% of NC women: they are racist (which I don't believe) or they will vote for a candidate based on no other factor than their gender (I don't believe this either - but I guess we'll have to agree to disagree).  

So, to answer your last question, it is not that I cannot imagine that Clinton is that motivating (I find her incredibly motivating), it is that I don't think NC women are that stupid.  I have a strong feminist wife who supports Clinton greatly.  We've had heated debates on whether this country will ever vote for a woman president - she thinks the current Dem primary is proof we're not ready (or even close ) to voting for a woman president - I disagree with her.  For the sake of our marriage we don't discuss it much, she is very emotional about the topic (and so am I) and she is very upset and frustrated at the outcome of the Dem primary.  All that said, if Obama were running against a woman Republican, my wife would vote for Obama - not the woman candidate who shares none of her views and opinions, yet does share her gender.  It wouldn't matter how inspirational the Republican woman was, my wife would never support a pro-life, pro-tax cuts for the rich, pro-war, pro-torture, pro-guns, anti-gay marriage candidate simply becuase they were a woman.  My wife holds the opposite view in all of those cases and to claim she would vote for such a candidate based on their gender is to say she is stupid.  My wife is not stupid, and neither are 10% of NC women.  As I said at the end of my original post, I think these 10% of women are not Republicans, but are instead diehard Clinton-supporting Dems who will eventually vote for Obama.  I hope I am right.  

Sorry for the long response.


[ Parent ]
As full of cognitive dissonance as it may be, there are Republican prochoice women (0.00 / 0)
who vote for republicans...lots of them in some mistaken idea that ti doesn't matter....I know I have been a member of a prochoice 504C board for a decade or two.. I have lobbied legislatures with these women they exist in large numbers...there are lots of Republican women who would happily vote for her who are prochoice who in the past kept voting for R's...she motivates those kind of women.... but Obama offers them nothing that any other prior male Dem did and they didn't vote for them....

"Incrementalism isn't a different path to the same place, it could be a different path to a different place"
Stoller


[ Parent ]
Cognitive dissonance indeed (0.00 / 0)
I too know quite a few pro-choice women who vote Republican.  However, I don't think the abortion debate is going to be a big player this year.  The war and the economy seem to be shaping most of the debate.  Integral to the economy is health care, free trade, immigration and education, to name a few issues.  I don't see much difference between Clinton and Obama on these issues, certainly when compared to McCain.  To repeat what I've said earlier, if women bought into Clinton's message on these issues, there is every reason to believe they will eventually buy into Obama's message rather than McCain's.  I don't think its a matter of Obama being the same as previous Dem nominees.  Its a matter of Obama being substantially different than the failed ideas of Bush - ideas that McCain wants to continue.  

Ultimately, you and I disagree on a key premise: you think all or most of the 10% of NC women who would vote for Clinton over McCain but McCain over Obama are Republicans and I think all or most of them are diehard Clinton-supporting Dems.  I don't imagine we're going to convert one another to the opposite opinion.  No offense, but I really hope I'm right and you are wrong.  If I'm right, these women will eventually come around and vote for Obama (or at least a large number of them will).  


[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search