High Information Swing Districts: MN-03, NJ-07 and WA-08

by: northcountry

Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 08:00


DistrictPartisan Index(Cook)Friday House Line (Chris Cillizza)2006 Congressional 2004 Presidential
MN-03R+11264.85% [R]35.04% [D]Kerry [48.05%] Bush [50.95%]
NJ-07R+1949.42% [R] 47.22% [D]Kerry [46.9%] Bush [53.01%]
WA-08D+21951.46% [R] 48.54% [D]Kerry [50.63%] Bush [48.02%]

What do these three districts have in common? All three are currently represented by Republicans and have solid pockets of high information voters, creative class professionals and symbolic analysts. They are suburban in nature and boast a healthy dose of diversity be it geographic, economic, ethnic or racial. Obama should do quite well in these districts and has already scored impressive caucus victories in both Minnesota and Washington State.

These districts and their congressional representatives also hold the key to a progressive governing coalition in an Obama administration. Much as southern democrats and Bush Dogs have held the key to democratic legislation and progressive progress over the last generation, suburban congressional democrats will exert crucial influence in energy policy, transportation, immigration, healthcare, telecommunications and technology policy over the next decade.

Over the next several weeks we will explore these districts and their candidates. We’ll examine current polling data where it exists, look at current patterns of representation and the strengths and weaknesses of the democratic challengers in each district (MN-03 and NJ-07 are open seats due to retirements by republican congressman).

northcountry :: High Information Swing Districts: MN-03, NJ-07 and WA-08
MN-03, NJ-07 and WA-08 are true swing districts represented by a wide range of republican congressmen.

MN-03 is represented by moderate congressman Jim Ramstad a co-sponsor of the Wellstone Mental Health Equity Act with Patrick Kennedy. Ramstad however, has also been a solid vote for the Bush administration on the Iraq war and a reliable supporter of administration initiatives in Iraq and Afghanistan.

WA-08's David Reichert is best known as the sheriff who caught theGreen River Serial Killer and as an out and out sexist (HT to Matt) with this 2006 ad on former Microsoft program manager Darcy Burner.

Republican Mike Ferguson is a career opportunist who first ran for Congress against Frank Pallone in NJ-06, a district in which he had never lived before.  After being trounced  57% to 43%, Ferguson moved to New Providence in NJ-07 after Representative Bob Franks announced his intentions to run for the U.S. Senate.  Ferguson is a native of Ridgewood NJ and attended the prestigious Delbarton School in Morristown, Notre Dame and Georgetown.  Ferguson is pretty right wing for NJ, though nationally his stance against drilling in ANWAR and his stated support for the Endangered Species act have served to moderate his image.  Ferguson is the former Executive Director for the Catholic Campaign for America and there is some speculation that he is a member of Opus Dei.  Another view of Opus Dei is here.

Established in 1989 The Catholic Campaign has a very distinct outlook on public life:

The growing confidence of conservative Catholics to speak as Catholics in the public square was much in evidence at the conference. Old inhibitions born of past discrimination are quickly being set aside in favor of a more self-assured, activist posture as more and more Catholics sense the need for the renewal of American public life. This trend was strongly affirmed by Neuhaus, editor of the influential journal First Things, who encouraged the audience to think of themselves not as American Catholics but as Catholic Americans, with a responsibility to contribute to the vitality of American democracy precisely by nurturing a distinctively Catholic way of being American. Conference speakers left no doubt that this includes above all an unswerving loyalty to a pro-family agenda in service of what John Paul II has termed the culture of life. The several women who spoke at the conference enthusiastically supported this emphasis, and drew a close connection between a strong pro-life stance and what Campaign board member Mary Ellen Bork referred to as an "an authentic womanhood."

We'll take a closer look at Ferguson and what his 2000 election and 2008 retirement in NJ-07 may mean to the district and to the conservative movement in suburbia in later posts.

The Challengers

The three democratic challengers offer different and distinct backgrounds and perspectives. Burner and Stender both fit the classic model of the modern suburban democrat; female, married, kids, with an age range running from the mid thirties to early fifties.  Stender offers experience in local and state government having served as a councilwomen, mayor, county freeholder, and state assemblywoman. Burner is a former group program manager with Microsoft, a position requiring a unique combination of smarts, creativity and business discipline. Madia, the youngest of the challengers in these three districts, just turned 30 this year.  Madia is an attorney and former Marine lawyer who spent a year with a downtown Minneapolis law firm prior to running for Congress.

Burner and Stender have been raising buckets of money and have both out raised their opponents to date. However Lance, the republican candidate for NJ-07, just won a six way primary battle which included Kate Whitman, daughter of former NJ Governor Christine Todd Whitman. Madia, the democratic challenger in MN-03, was involved in a DFL endorsing contest through April 12th.   This quarter's upcoming filings will shed some much needed light on where these contests are headed.

Fundraising as of 3/31/08:

DistrictDem Cash on Hand Dem Cash Raised Dem Cash Spent Rep Cash on Hand Rep Cash Rep Raised Rep Cash Spent
MN-03$190,368$362,445 $172,077$688,342 $772,199$83,856
NJ-07$913,452$1,193,275 $283,487$191,104 $382,145 $191,040
WA-08$921,615 $1,396,631$506,716 $698,035$1,370,991 $676,240

Source: opensecrets.org

Each democratic challenger faces unique barriers in their respective races:

Burner must convince voters in WA-08 that she will better represent their interests than Dave Reichert and that she has the experience and skills needed to serve in the U.S. Congress.  Reichert aggressively challenged Burner on her experience in 2006 and pulled out a victory in a district where John Kerry beat Bush by two and a half percentage points.

Stender must trade on her deep community roots in NJ-07.  She faces an added challenge with Leonard Lance's victory in the NJ-07 primary and Dick Zimmer's win in NJ's U.S. Senate primary.  Both Lance and Zimmer represent a more moderate brand of horse country republicanism and have deep roots in the western portions of NJ-07.  Zimmer represented portions of Hunterdon and Somerset County in the U.S. House and Lance has served as a State Senator, Senate Minority Leader and Assemblyman since 1991.  He is the third generation of his family to serve in the New Jersey Legislature.  Like Stender, he was born in the district and has spent most of his life there.  This district will be won in the trenches and will require strong efforts in mobilizing turnout in the candidates home communities as well as among the base.

Madia faces his own challenges.  A relative newcomer to the district, he's single in a district where kids and families overrun the parks and Paneras and where school concerns predominate. A Greenberg Quinlan poll commissioned in March by his opponent during the DFL endorsement contest showed Madia trailing Erik Paulsen, his republican opponent, 43% - 40%.  

Madia is counting on his ability to outwork and out hustle his republican opponent.  And there's no doubting Madia's capacity for hard work and hustling.  Madia is also pinning his hopes on a strong field effort and grassroots mobilization.  He recently hired Stu Rosenberg, a regional field director for the HRC, as his new campaign manager.  The campaign has held several door knocks in republican communities since Madia's endorsement victory and plans to continue this emphasis.   Minnesota has a strong tradition of grassroots organizing and the Obama campaign's recent appointment of Jeff Blodgett as Minnesota State Director may give Madia a big boost.  Blodgett is known for his strong grassroots skills and has trained many organizers and candidates through Camp Wellstone.  

UPDATE, 9:02AMCST: Joe Bodell at Minnesota Campaign Report has an interview up with Madia's new campaign manager

Future posts will look at each of these districts more in-depth.  We'll also spend some time on the fundraising numbers once they are released and polling information as it becomes available.  Longer-term I'd like to take a look at the implications of these candidacies for a progressive majority.

Update: 1:55PM CST Now cross posted at Booman Tribune"


Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Feel free to research the work of local bloggers (0.00 / 0)
I get a kick out of reading analysis on national blogs about local races, but so often it is as if they're discovering the issues and candidates for the first time.

Inevitably, what happens next is those less familiar with the races and challengers campaign (as opposed to the locals who know the players very well), have a tendency to misread them.

I live in WA-08 and have been covering Burner and Reichert since early 2006 when she emerged as a candidate, and along with several other local area bloggers we have been fixated on the minutia and day by day of this race.

I'm sure the same is true for MN-03 and NJ-07: there are local blogs out there covering these candidates.

You'd do well to read more of our work as consider our vantage point.

On The Road To 2008: Commentary on issues as we countdown to the next opportunity to change the direction of America


Will do (0.00 / 0)
I'm actually local to one of the races being covered above and a native of an adjoining CD in the other one.

I don't know as much about WA-08 or Burner as the other ones.  Would love to have your perspective here.

What I'm hoping to do is provide a comparative perspective on three races with very different geographies and political cultures, yet with very similar demographics and socio-political dynamics.

I think we can learn a lot about the prospects for an emerging progressive majority by comparing these races. I'm considering a future post comparing Stender's and Burner's backgrounds in the context of Matt's post on "the female archetype" in politics.

Why do you think Burner lost in 2006?  


[ Parent ]
Many possible reasons (0.00 / 0)
Burner was a complete unknown going into the race and had a mountain to climb, but just fell short.  The incumbent Reichert is well known from his days as county Sheriff, and having his name associated with the capture of the infamous Green River Killer.  That is a much smaller disadvantage this time around for Burner.

The Republicans and Rove poured a ton of late money into the race to help get out the vote of their base.  They might not have the resources to do so this year.

They ran a late in the game ad some have deemed sexist that portrayed Harvard schooled Burner as a ditsy blond, and the Burner campaign response was absent or unheard by voters.  This year the campaign will be better prepared to fight back.

She raised as much money as Reichert in 2006, when really she needed to raise much more money to help fund the campaign efforts needed to minimize her weaknesses, such as her not being as well known as Reichert.  This year she could potentially raise $1 million more than last time and more than Reichert which should help, and she should have more DCCC money available to her.

Reichert was able to look more effective in 2006 because he was in a Republican led Congress.  This time his Power Ranking is 401st and he has been less effective.

Reichert risks alienating base Republicans by appearing too moderate for their taste.  Voters may choose stay home thinking that they'd prefer a more conservative Republican to take on Burner in 2010.  One such candidate is Reagan Dunn, son of the late Jennifer Dunn who held the seat before Reichert for 12 years, and currently on the King County Council.

Reichert's continued stance on the Iraq war is likely to trump all other positions he has this year, despite attempts to create a moderate record on the environment.  Voters will find that choice even more stark between the candidates given Burner's work producing the "Responsible Plan to End the War in Iraq".

Burner is a more confident candidate this time around.  She learned a lot of lessons from losing in 2006 that will server her well.  She's more in control of the campaign this time, really running the show IMO, and she working on doing the things needed to improve turnout in her favor, needing only 5 votes per precinct to close the gap.  Obama's presence on a ticket will help greatly.  In a normal Presidential election year the district might expect 100,000 more voters than in an off year such as 2006, but this year that might be far higher, and the additional voters are likely to be Democratic leaning.  That in itself could make the difference even if nothing else were different.


On The Road To 2008: Commentary on issues as we countdown to the next opportunity to change the direction of America


[ Parent ]
How about a new coalition? (0.00 / 0)
Based on working people like poor whites, african-americans and immigrant latinos? Somehow I think the number of people working at gas stations, nursing homes, restaurants, and on construction sites far outnumbers the number of microsoft engineers and middle-level management types that are part of the so-called creative class. And the former demographic group is also much more likely to be highly progressive and more interested in social justice.  

We already have that coalition (4.00 / 1)
They're called "Democrats".

These districts, however, don't have so many poor whites, African-Americans or Latinos (although they undoubtedly make up a part of the Democratic base there). They are generally middle-class districts. That's not exactly a reason to abandon them and that doesn't make them intrinsically hostile to progressivism.

Forgotten Countries - a foreign policy-focused blog


[ Parent ]
That's exactly right Englishlefty (0.00 / 0)
They are generally middle-class districts. That's not exactly a reason to abandon them and that doesn't make them intrinsically hostile to progressivism.

These districts have a lot of progressive tendencies and potential. In NJ-07 for instance Linda Stender has more or less charted her own path around the prevailing democratic machine and has taken some pretty progressive stances.

MN-03 is a really interesting case. The right candidate could really move the Overton Window here and push progressive policy.  But, none of the most credible, progressive, candidates entered the DFL endorsment contest this year. The most progressive democrat running was the mayor of one of the district's wealthiest communities and a former republican to boot. He was the only democratic candidate in MN-03 to come out in favor of single-payer health care.

Madia's base MN-03 is actually in the most blue collar and working class part of the district.  

Smart candidates and smart unions will partner in these districts even if there is low union density there.  Adam is right in that there are a lot of service and building trades workers in these districts. Many may not live here, or live in small enclaves, but they are present every day.

Unions that work hard for candidates in these districts may find a strong ally come 2009 in areas like card-check neutrality, Davis-Bacon prevailing wages legislation, living wages and public investment projects.

There had been a lot of talk in MN-03 about providing better transit and transportation options for workers that would benefit many SEIU members who work in office parks and hotels along the 494 corridor.  

Lots of opportunities for social justice and progressive coalitions in districts like these. It takes the right candidates though.  


[ Parent ]
I wasn't clear I guess (0.00 / 0)
I was speaking as to what should form the basis of Obama's governing coalition. Yes, these groups already vote Democratic. But what is the voter participation? How politically active are they? I was just making the point that the numbers we're talking about in the creative class don't match up with the numbers of people in the working class. And working class folks are also key to furthering those reinforcing progressive organizations, i.e. unions, that are the key to actually moving this country to the left; not just winning elections.

[ Parent ]
I agree 100% (4.00 / 1)
My hypothesis is that these suburban districts will actually be the lynchpins or barriers for progressive legislation much as southern democrats were the lynchpins or barriers for civil rights legislation and DLC inspired policy.

So in order to ensure universal healthcare that is not designed merely as universal insurance profits for insurance companies, employee-friendly legislation, effective energy and transit policies, media and teleco reform and reproductive freedoms, suburban democrats will play an extraordinarily important role - quite possibly in ourtsized influence relative to their actual size.

That's why these districts are so important. Assume for a moment that the Obama governing coalition is actually poor whites, African-Americans (and there are many African-Americans in these districts who are highly accomplished members of the creative class) and Latino immigrants.  

Now picture a coalition  of Blue Dogs and Suburban Democrats allied with the insurance industy during the fight over healthcare.  What happens? What sort of healthcare do we get?

Now picture suburban democrats allied with the unions who helped get them elected and the core Obama governing coalition outlined above.  Now what sort of healthcare do we get?


[ Parent ]
Gotcha (0.00 / 0)
Thanks for the clarification. On board with you now.

[ Parent ]
Yeah, I have to agree with EnglishLefty (4.00 / 1)
We lead in all of the groups you mentioned. The group where there is real room to gain there is perhaps poor white men, but very simply, that likely won't happen in the South as long as blacks are in the coalition, and gains elsewhere would likely come at the expense of other social issues such as gay rights/abortion.

Right now, Democrats have an opportunity to make a serious play for middle class whites without having to give up any sort of core principles. Trying to boost support among southern whites would be far more costly to core progressive ideals.

Maintaining/growing our lead among Latina/os, the fastest growing demographic in the country, is obviously vital.

I support John McCain because children are too healthy anyway.


[ Parent ]
Those districts already vote Dem (0.00 / 0)
They are represented by Dems (except in the South) and aren't likely to change in this election, judging from the polls in OH and PA.  They aren't being taken for granted by the people representing them in most cases, but to the extent they are, these districts might be ripe for primary challenges.  But they aren't the growth areas for building a Dem majority, and that is why the focus on suburban districts and the growing managerial class.

You might be surprised to learn that the white working class has been shrinking as a proportion of the white electorate (to say nothing of the electorate as a whole) with manual workers down from 47% in 1950 to 24% now, while professional and managerial workers make up 43% (vs 32% in 1950).  Non-white working class voters are already the Dems' strongest voting bloc.  See Alan Abramowitz here.  The Dems' growth constituency is the mass upper middle class, and it is increasingly attuned to the Dems' message.

John McCain--He's not who you think he is.


[ Parent ]
Did I exclude my comments to white working class? (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
No, and (0.00 / 0)
I pointed put that the non-white working class already votes overwhelmingly Dem, and it is the non-white part of the working class that has grown, while the white working class has shrunk as a percentage of both the working class as a whole and of the electorate.  So, yes, there is room to grow new voters among the unregistered working class of all colors, particularly among women, but not so much the potential to flip CDs, which is what the post was about.  That potential largely rests with the suburban managerial class.  

But this is not to say that the Dems should sacrifice one group to another.  The Dem Party can appeal to all of these groups, maybe on different issues, maybe on similar ones.  

John McCain--He's not who you think he is.


[ Parent ]
VA-11, CT-04 (0.00 / 0)
also fit the same mold. Gerry Connolly will go into the general election in VA-11 with a huge name rec advantage, although his GOP opponent has proven a formidable fundraiser. Jim Himes faces an uphill battle against Chris Shays in CT-04.

USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox