Presidential Forecast, 6/24: Feeling Confident

by: Chris Bowers

Tue Jun 24, 2008 at 15:26


Electoral College: Obama 276, McCain 168, Toss-up 91
National popular vote: Obama 47.7%-42.2% McCain


(Dark Blue (169): Obama +10.0% or more
Lean Blue (107): Obama +3.6%-+9.9%
White / Toss-up (94): Obama +3.5% to McCain +3.5%
Lean Red (44): McCain +3.6%-+9.9%
Dark Red (124): McCain +10.0% or more
)

New polls today from Indiana, Michigan, New Mexico, and Pennsylvania are all good news for Obama. (Is there another kind of news for Obama lately?) While none of them cause categories to shift in Obama's direction, the Indiana confirms a close campaign in Hosier state, the Michigan poll moves Obama into a slight lead there, and the New Mexico poll confirms Obama's lead. So, while no states move categories, the existing, very positive Obama map is confirmed.

All of the above states, even the surprising ones like Alaska, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Nebraska-02, North Carolina, North Dakota and South Carolina really are competitive this year. That is a grand total of 61 supposedly deep red electoral that McCain cannot count as part of his base. McCain's base states now only add up to 124 electoral votes, far less than Bush was ever able to count on. A blowout can really happen. Exciting stuff!

State by state details in the extended entry.  

Chris Bowers :: Presidential Forecast, 6/24: Feeling Confident
Solid Obama: 169 Electoral Votes
State EV's Obama % McCain % Margin # Polls
California 55 51.6% 38.2% +13.4% 5
Connecticut 7 49.5% 39.5% +10.0% 2
D.C. 3 -- -- +80.0% 0
Hawaii 4 61.0% 31.0% +30.0% 1
Illinois 21 59.0% 34.0% +25.0% 2
Maine-AL* 2 53.0% 35.5% +17.5% 2
Maine-01* 1 -- -- +21.0% 0
Maine-02* 1 -- -- +14.0% 0
Maryland 10 52.0% 38.5% +13.5% 2
Massachusetts 12 52.0% 34.0% +18.0% 2
New Hampshire 4 50.5% 39.0% +10.5% 2
New York 31 51.0% 33.5% +17.5% 4
Rhode Island 4 47.5% 34.0% +13.5% 2
Vermont 3 60.0% 32.5% +27.5% 2
Washington 11 54.0% 37.5% +16.5% 2

Lean Obama: 107 Electoral Votes
State EV's Obama % McCain % Margin # Polls
Colorado 9 46.0% 41.0% +5.0% 2
Delaware 3 50.0% 41.0% +9.0% 1
Iowa 7 47.0% 41.5% +5.5% 2
Minnesota 10 49.5% 42.5% +7.0% 2
New Jersey 15 46.5% 39.0% +7.5% 2
New Mexico 5 48.0% 42.5% +5.5% 2
Oregon 7 47.0% 41.5% +5.5% 2
Ohio 20 47.0% 41.7% +5.3% 3
Pennsylvania 21 49.0% 41.0% +8.0% 2
Wisconsin 10 49.0% 41.0% +8.0% 3

Toss-up: 94 Electoral Votes
State EV's Obama % McCain % Margin # Polls
Alaska 3 41.5% 44.5% -3.0% 2
Florida 27 45.0% 44.7% +0.3% 3
Michigan 17 43.3% 40.7% +2.4% 3
Missouri 11 44.3% 44.3% Even 3
Nevada 5 42.0% 44.5% -2.5% 2
North Carolina 15 41.3% 44.3% -3.0% 3
North Dakota 3 42.0% 43.0% -1.0% 2
Virginia 13 46.0% 44.5% +1.5% 2

Lean McCain: 44 Electoral Votes
State EV's Obama % McCain % Margin # Polls
Georgia 15 42.0% 47.5% -5.5% 2
Indiana 11 43.0% 47.0% -4.0% 2
Kansas 6 39.3% 47.7% -8.4% 3
Montana 3 41.0% 47.5% -6.5% 2
Nebraska-02** 1 -- -- -5.0% 0
South Carolina 8 42.0% 48.0% -6.0% 2

Solid McCain: 124 Electoral Votes
State EV's Obama % McCain % Margin # Polls
Alabama 9 33.0% 58.0% -25.0% 3
Arizona 10 38.5% 48.5% -10.0% 2
Arkansas 6 36.0% 52.5% -16.5% 2
Idaho 4 39.0% 52.0% -13.0% 1
Kentucky 8 36.5% 55.0% -18.5% 2
Louisiana 9 38.0% 50.5% -12.5% 2
Mississippi 6 41.5% 52.0% -10.5% 2
Nebraska-AL** 2 36.0% 52.0% -16.0% 3
Nebraska-01** 1 -- -- -10.0% 0
Nebraska-03** 1 -- -- -34.0% 2
Oklahoma 7 29.5% 57.0% -27.5% 2
South Dakota 3 36.0% 49.5% -13.5% 2
Tennessee 11 33.5% 55.5% -22.0% 2
Texas 34 37.5% 52.0% -14.5% 2
Utah 5 31.0% 54.5% -23.5% 2
West Virginia 5 36.0% 49.0% -13.0% 2
Wyoming 3 37.5% 53.5% -16.0% 2

* Maine four electoral votes are awarded as follows: two for the statewide winner, and one for the winner of each congressional district. ME-01 is about 3.5% more Democratic than the state as a whole, while ME-02 is about 3.5% less Democratic than the state as a whole.

** Nebraska's five electoral votes are awarded as follows: two for the statewide winner, and one for the winner of each congressional district. NE-01 is about 6.0% more Democratic than the state as a whole, NE-02 is about 11.0% more Democratic than the state as a whole, and NE-03 is about 18.0% less Democratic than the state as a whole.

Methodology
I will update at least once every day between now and November 4th. The methodology is simple and straightforward.

  1. For each state, take all polls conducted for the state over the previous thirty days, and average them.
  2. If one polling firm has more than one poll in a state over the last thirty days, take only the most recent poll.
  3. Every state has at least two polls. If two polls were not conducted in a state over the last thirty days, use the two most recent polls from any polling firm.
  4. If only one poll has been conducted in a state, then only use that poll.
  5. No polling firm discrimination whatsoever. Polls are never excluded because the organization has a bad or partisan reputation.

As we move closer to the election and more data becomes available, the time frames for polls included in the averages will decrease. Also, when the amount of data increases, I will be able to start projecting the swing, "toss-up" states. Right now, however, there just isn't enough data to push those states into one camp or the other.


Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Not to nitpick.... (0.00 / 0)
but I think you mean Hoosier in the first paragraph.

speaking of Hosiers (0.00 / 0)
Indiana will be moving to toss-up soon, when the "Indiana Legislative Insight" poll is removed from the average.  

[ Parent ]
On a more substantial note... (4.00 / 1)
If this state of play continues through the conventions then McCain will be forced into the very difficult choice of playing not to lose or going for broke and risking a complete landslide.

If he chooses to commit money into the marginal 'red' states he will almost certainly keep it close (keep Obama under ~300) but almost certainly lose the election.

On the other hand, if he goes the route of the Congressional Republicans in 2006, he will hope that Indiana, Alaska, etc. all come around in the end while he focuses on the more traditional swing states.

I imagine he will chose the second option as there are no points for second place here, and while it would certainly hurt the Republicans down-ticket, I don't get the impression from McCain that this is one of his main concerns.

If he does not get lucky however, we could certainly be looking at a game-changing election. I like it.


And to top it off (0.00 / 0)
If he does ignore traditional republican states like IN, MT, AK, and ND, then it becomes even more advantageous that Obama is developing such a strong voter turnout machine. After all, it doesn't take much to turn a state with only 400-500k total voters (e.g. AK, MT and ND).  

[ Parent ]
Well, There's Sporadic Talk of Him Choosing Condie Rice As A 'Hail Mary' (0.00 / 0)
Which would be a really interesting way of distancing himself from Bush, don't you think?

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
But why? (0.00 / 0)
This is extremely encouraging news and I almost hope that the MSM doesn't catch on about how strong Obama is looking. In sports, people talk about teams peaking at the right time and it would be great if the media realized Obama was going to win within a few weeks of the election, so that there wouldn't be time for them to look for a new story about the bloom coming off the rose (oh the cradle, endlessly rocking). It would also be particularly gratifying to observe how various Brooks/Broder types react to being deeply wrong about the country's enthusiasm for a progressive leader.

Another point this positive polling raises in my mind is whether McCain's weakness is more of a piece with the tremendous weakness the Republicans have displayed in various state elections and in polling generally or whether it's more due to his purported weakness among republications themselves. Or Obama's purported cross-over appeal. Probably it's just a wonderful combination of all three.


The GOP Brand Is MUCH Weaker Than McCain (0.00 / 0)
For example, Democracy Corps, from early June reported on one polling scenario, where they tested support for incumbent Republicans by name, in a script, contrasted with a statement supporting a generic Democratic challenger.

In January this had produced an 8-point preference for the Democrats (49-41) and a 10-point preference among those who strongly agreed (36-26), in January.  But by May, when the latest polling was done, the difference had exploded to 18 points (55-37), including more who strongly agreed with supporting the Democratic challenger (44%) than the total supporting the Republican incumbent.

So, McCain is looking positive vibrant compared to the GOP House candidates.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
I Have An Honest Question (4.00 / 1)
I've already laid out the case for Edwards, and pointed out that it connects with the opportunity visible in the Southeast coastal states from Virginia to Florida.

Is there any other candidate one can make some sort of aregument for in terms of this map, and working to exploit red state weakness?

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


Walkin' Lawton Chiles circa 1992 (0.00 / 0)
But unfortunately he's passed on.

[ Parent ]
Well, Yeah (0.00 / 0)
Harry Truman would be a good VP for picking up Missouri, if it comes to that.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
sure (4.00 / 1)
Kaine or Warner in Virginia. Bayh in Indiana. Maybe Daschle in North Dakota.

The truth about Saxby Chambliss

[ Parent ]
I think the best counter-argument is simply that (0.00 / 0)
Edwards is not a "regional" candidate.  This is not to say that Edwards would not be the best choice for veep -- I think he would be -- just that the best arguments in favor of Obama choosing Edwards don't have to do with regional dynamics, but rather with national dynamics.  In other words, it seems that Edwards helps Obama everywhere, not just in the southeast.    

[ Parent ]
Mike Easley. (0.00 / 0)
Musicblind made the case for Governor Easley in this DU post; which I excerpt here:

he has his finger on the pulse of "blue collar voters" which he could help scoot along in their move towards Obama, AND he has endorsed Clinton (which would be a good way to pull in the Clinton demographic!) Plus he has loads of experience in the public eye.

The fact that Easley endorsed Clinton would go a long way towards making the "unity" claim more than just words.  Easley's 'pansy' comment--if exploited by Republicans--gives Democrats an open door to John McCain's, um, 'trollop' comment.  Easley has executive-branch experience, but is a "Washington outsider".  He's a well-known NASCAR supporter which (I hate to play into stereotypes here), will play well with southern voters.  He's about as much of a "centrist" as you're likely to find, which would help shore up Obama's support among moderates and independents.

Easley has huge approval ratings in North Carolina. A case can be made that he'd do a better job of putting North Carolina in play than John Edwards would, based on the fact that in 2004, Easley pulled in 400,000 more votes in NC than the Kerry/Edwards ticket did, and Easley won more votes in either of his gubernatorial elections than Edwards did in his lone Senate election.  And if Easley helps carry NC in 2008, then we'd get Kay Hagan and Larry Kissell as well.  



[ Parent ]
How about? (0.00 / 0)
Sen. James Webb, born in Missouri, elected from Virginia.

[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox