Watching Their Lives Pass Before Their Eyes

by: Chris Bowers

Thu Jul 24, 2008 at 18:05


Marc Ambinder dedicated his blog today for a pathetically out of date guest post by Nora McAlvanah on why Obama's speech in Berlin will somehow be a negative for him:

GOPers may have a field day with at least one oft-used-line from Obama's speech today, which he amended slightly for his Berlin audience:

"America, this is our moment. This is our time" - Obama, speaking in MN the night he officially won the Dem nomination (6/3).

"People of Berlin -- people of the world -- this is our moment. This is our time" - Obama, in his first formal speech of his foreign tour (7/24).

What ad guru won't be tempted to play the clips back-to-back, only one to a widely ecstatic cheering crowd of Europeans? Insert announcer with an appropriately unnerving, deep voice, asking: "Which is it, Obama? Who's moment? Who's time?"

It's not John Kerry showing off his proficiency in French. Quiet the opposite, really. But maybe when a candidate is on foreign soil he shouldn't use such un-foreign rhetoric.

That's a good idea. Republicans should run an ad showing Obama speaking to adoring crowds from around the world. I'm sure that will make Obama look really bad.

More in the extended entry.  

Chris Bowers :: Watching Their Lives Pass Before Their Eyes

McAlvanah suffers from the same delusion as most of the center-right elitist punditry. I call this disease "extreme commoner xenophobia delusion," or ECXD for short. This disease causes pundits to believe that the American electorate is overflowing with incredibly bigoted rubes who can't stand anything that even remotely deviates from their normal cultural experiences.

The truth is that the country has changed dramatically since the conservative backlash dominated elections of the previous two generations, and its far more pluralistic composition has rendered such xenophobic attacks inert. Witness, for example, the remarkable electoral success of Republican immigration messaging over the past few years. Also, given the rapid change of opinion on related subjects, it won't be long before anti-gay marriage initiatives begin to fail at the ballot box across the country. The one in California is already is serious trouble.

We are just not a majority conservative backlash nation anymore. Sixteen years ago, the electorate was 87% white, but in 2008 it will be about 75% white. Eighteen years ago, only 10% of the country identified as non-Christian, but now that percentage is up to 22%. White non-Christians are increasing their share of the electorate even faster than non-whites, and both groups vote for Democrats at nearly 3-1 rates.

The new America just isn't about xenophobic backlash anymore. It is sad that it ever was, but thankfully that time is over. The likes of Nora McAlvanah might think that this is the sort of message that Republicans have waited their lives for, but the truth is that the life work of conservatives is passing before their eyes. An African-American college professor who is viewed by more than 55% of the country as a liberal is beating the most highly thought of Republican in a generation (McCain has the highest national favorable rating of any Republican elected official in the country). That simply would not be possible if the old conservative coalition hadn't shrunk to minority status.

So go ahead, run your xenophobic ads about how horrible it is that someone who wants to be President of the United States wants to see America re-enter a global community of nations. Show people in several countries cheering wildly for him. I'm sure that will play well for your candidate and your cause. Or, at least it will play as well for your candidate and your cause as everything you have done over the last four years. Please, as America enters a pluralistic era, follow your xenophobia down a rabbit hole of generational minority status. We won't miss you governing the nation one bit.


Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Refreshing (4.00 / 4)
During the course of the day (slow work day) I developed an obsession with reading right-wing and MSM perspectives on the Berlin speech. It started to depress me. I just can't comprehend how anyone, anywhere, could see this speech as a bad thing. Neutral? Sure, I imagine plenty of people don't care one way or the other. But bad?

The United States is THE most engaged nation in international affairs. We alone have more influence in matters of trade, war and peace than any other nation, or group of nations. We led the way in developing the United Nations, and the organizations that govern global development and trade, and the largest and most powerful defense alliances in the world. Our military bases, corporations and cultural influence blanket the entire planet.

Yet somehow, SOMEHOW, I am supposed to believe that Americans will be repelled by seeing a popular American politician give a well-received speech to cheering throngs of our ALLIES? I have seen multiple articles suggesting Americans will be turned off because Germans were once Nazis.  But they are not Nazis (as if this is some recent revelation?), and instead are one of our most important trading partners and military allies. Who doesn't know this? Is Obama going to lose the all important "WW2 Veterans Who Are Still Alive and Hold a Grudge" demographic?

Sorry to rant.
Anyway, thank you Chris for giving me some rationale for ignoring the right-wing narrative. I'm going to take the optimistic perspective too - instead of giving Americans too little credit, as the media seems determined to do, I will instead give the media itself too little credit. That is usually a safe bet.

"Don't hate the media, become the media" -Jello Biafra


I have a better question .. (0.00 / 0)
when is the TradMed going to catch up with the rest of the country .. they always try to tear the Democrat down .. I know it's been hashed over here .. plus Atrios and Digby(among others) ... but in a sense .. I really do think that the TradMed hates America(No, I don't write it as a joke) .. I mean seriously .. why would anyone call Tom Friedman and Maureen Dowd liberals(They are two easy examples)? .. no wonder newspapers are dying .. and the audiences for the network nightly news is shriveling up .. they don't inform about anything ... they only seek to muddy the civic discourse .. and Ambinder reminds me of Fred "Mr. Surge" Kagan(I just had to say that)

[ Parent ]
The b!tch and moan POTUS campaign strategy (4.00 / 2)
Individually the Republican trash-talking points do not amount to anything but they are hoping a constant drip-drip of negativity will work as a war of attrition. "Grump grump, get off my lawn, you suck" ... they think this will lay the subconscious groundwork for a groundswell of discontent with Obama around Labor Day when most of America starts paying attention to the election.

No one's ever complained their way to the presidency before but you never know there's always a first time :-)

Nothing will shut them up but the corporate media will pay less attention to them when they fall farther and farther behind in all the electoral races. The corporate media is mostly a bunch of power groupies.  


What a thoroughly depressing view of the world they have (4.00 / 1)
That a strong, secure, peaceful America and a strong, secure, peaceful world cannot occur in tandem.  

Indeed, the Onion was on to this in 2001 (0.00 / 0)
http://www.theonion.com/conten...

The Onion, on Bush's inauguration:

"My fellow Americans," Bush said, "at long last, we have reached the end of the dark period in American history that will come to be known as the Clinton Era, eight long years characterized by unprecedented economic expansion, a sharp decrease in crime, and sustained peace overseas. The time has come to put all of that behind us."


[ Parent ]
Obama owes McCain big bucks ... (4.00 / 1)
...for the Arizona Senator's campaign consulting advice: Go to Iraq and Afghanistan and Europe. How many votes is that trip going to be worth?  

Obama has gone down in the polls (0.00 / 0)
since the trip started.

[ Parent ]
He's gone down in some polls. By a small amount. (0.00 / 0)


"Don't hate the media, become the media" -Jello Biafra

[ Parent ]
And up in others and he maintained his position in more (0.00 / 0)
Polls are fun to follow but seriously people they are not omnipotent. Does nobody remember the New Hampshire Primary?

[ Parent ]
The overseas trip will pay dividends (4.00 / 1)
His numbers may stay flat or even go down right now, but it is crucial that Obama took this trip now during the slow days of summer. He got lots of shots looking presidential, he met with plenty of foreign leaders, and he even got the leaders of Iraq to endorse his Iraq policy.

This will pay off big time in the fall. Not taking the trip would have been a blunder.


[ Parent ]
The sad fact is (0.00 / 0)
that there are a lot of Americans out there who don't like candidates who are popular with foreigners. Remember how much hay the GOP made in 2004 over the fact that the French liked John Kerry?

I expect Obama to drop even further in the polls after today's speech.


[ Parent ]
Yeah Americans sure hated JFK (0.00 / 0)
And Clinton. Not.

[ Parent ]
Down in the polls and I'm getting a little down on Americans (0.00 / 0)
How could this country be so utterly brain dead?  McSame shouldn't even be close in the polls.  That he has gained in some since Obama left is another confirmation of the stupidity of this electorate.

I read this:

http://www.boomantribune.com/s...

and this:

http://www.boomantribune.com/s...

They offer some further insight on this.  Trying to understand this "stupidity" phenomenon in the short and long run is not easy.


[ Parent ]
Obamabats v. Obamabots (0.00 / 0)
If I'm an Obamabot then maybe we need to start talking about Obamabats: people who have been driven batshit crazy by Obama.

This freaking out from Day One over Obama's popularity is one of my favorite examples.

To paraphrase Monty Python: He's not the Messiah! He's a very popular boy!


Happy Germans (4.00 / 2)
Watching the crowd pictures today, particularly when Obama did a round of hand shaking and fist bumping at the end of his speech, you saw young Germans with faces filled with happiness, the kind of happiness that goes so well with the new EU Anthem, Ode to Joy.  Immediately following this, MSNBC switched to the McCain event, and what you saw was elderly glum people organizing themselves for a photo op in a Columbus Ohio Restaurant -- the kind of event which would have been good in the first week of campaigning in Iowa perhaps a year ago.  It was a stark comparison.  How can it not be all good that the faces tell you that what they observed and experienced made them happy and joyful?  

I know a great deal about the turf on which this event today transpired -- old family friends who were 30's era refugees from Germany who remembered with bitterness the park benches in the Tiergarten that were signed, "Jews prohibited from sitting here."  Seventy years ago, this was the site of one of Jesse Owen's greatest triumphs, though the then "Management" would not shake his hand at his medal ceremony.  Nor would the US Protest.  What was called the 23rd of June Alley during Cold War Days in honor of the East German Workers shot during the protests of 1953, is the Grand Avenue between the Victory Column and the Brandenberg Gate -- today it was filled with very happy Germans (and lots of Americans Abroad who, yes, can and will vote this fall) but the avenue was also the last fighter aircraft runway available in the final days of the defense of Berlin in May, 1945.  Sadly, the TV did not note or show the newly opened American Embassy, just behind and to the Right of the Brandenberg Gate.  It replaces the one we abandoned in December, 1941 which was bombed out during the war.  The new Holocaust Memorial is just beside the new US Embassy -- again, I saw only fleeting pictures, though I heard mention that Obama visited it briefly.  

I did see Right Wing Bloggers note that among other victories, the victory column was about Prussian victory in the Slesvig-Holsten wars of 1862-64, (Intentional use of Danish Spelling), but it was also to victory in the Franco Prussian Wars and victory over the Austro-Hungarians.  Yes, Bismark's wars of German Unification in the 1860's and 70's are the point, perhaps our media could do just a little History Teaching at events like this, since I don't think we do it in History Classes any more. Aside from Holsten, all the conquered lands memoralized are no longer part of Germany -- for various reasons one can research. (Versailles, Yalta, Potsdam, the 2+4 talks, etc.)  Some of the former Danish Lands are part of Germany, because the issue was settled by a fair internationally supervised plebeiscite after World War One, and though Churchill offered Denmark more slices at the end of WWII, the Danes said no thanks.  (There is a marvelous Danish Cartoon from 45, with Churchill as Bulldog in Butcher's Apron holding up Jutland as if it were a side of beef, and asking "How Much" -- and Lille Mor Danmark (little mother denmark -- like Uncle Sam) saying "Nej Tak, Ingen mere Tuskener!"  (no thanks, no more Germans.))  I suppose any discussion of conquest of land and empire is a little beyond our media.  

The speech is a gem -- someone with a real sense of history put that thing together.  A little rewording, and the language of Roosevelt and Churchill from the Atlantic Charter of August 1941 when they met on warships off the coast of Newfoundland is found in the thing, you see Kennedy Language, Reagan Language, Ike language -- it is all included if you can recognize it.      


Israeli's prefer Obama (4.00 / 1)
Found this very interesting.

Even more positive news from Barack Obama's trip to the Middle East: a new poll by Israel Radio shows, for perhaps the first time, Israelis preferring Obama to John McCain.

When asked "who would you rather see elected as the next president of the United States," Obama bested John McCain by a 37-28 margin. While far from a decisive advantage -- 35 percent of Israelis chose "no preference" or some other answer -- the poll reflects a notably different state of affairs from previous surveys, which generally showed McCain with a large advantage over Obama.

Obama's competitiveness spanned the political spectrum across Israel's top three parties. The Illinois Democrat trounced McCain among Israel's most liberal voters, who belong to the Labor Party (44-6), tied among more right-wing Likud voters (28-28), and held a slight edge among sympathizers of the Kadima Party, which is led by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert (40-32).

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox