Polling Trends: 2000, 2004 and 2008

by: Chris Bowers

Mon Aug 04, 2008 at 19:54


Charles Franklin has a new graph up that shows the national polling trends during the entire 2000, 2004, and 2008 campaigns. It is definitely worth a look:


The graph shows Kerry's, Gore's and Obama's national polling margin against the Republican nominee during the final year of each campaign. There are some very important lessons from this graph:

  • As of today, August 4th, Obama's current position (+3.3%) is superior to the best polling either Gore or Kerry ever enjoyed.
  • As of today, August 4th, Obama's current position is superior to any position he was in during the nomination campaign.
  • For all the talk of a polarized electorate, there has actually been substantial movement in the polls during the final three months of each of the last two campaigns. This could very well happen again, and it could happen in either direction. So, the campaign is nowhere near decided.

If there is a broader lesson to learn from this, I think it is that each campaign is different. We latch onto analogies from past elections, but 2000 and 2004 were completely different from each other in terms of their broad trends, even though they had similar results. And 2008 has started completely differently from either of those campaigns.

To get a bit tautological, the 2008 election is like the 2008 election.  Obama is ahead by more than other Democratic nominees from this decade, but he is slipping. The situation would be better if he had 527s to attack McCain, but it is too late for that now. The Obama campaign probably does have an attack strategy on McCain prepared, but they might want to hurry up the timetable on that one, and ratchet up the rhetoric a bit. Otherwise, it is a little late for strategizing, and it is time to start executing plans that were developed months ago.

Chris Bowers :: Polling Trends: 2000, 2004 and 2008

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
There's chatter (0.00 / 0)
that Bayh will be the VP choice. If so, I think that's a grave mistake, for a lot of reasons, but mainly because Obama needs a good attack dog for a running mate, and Bayh isn't it.

Well... (0.00 / 0)
Kind of annoying, but at least he's well liked in IN and, who knows, maybe he'll find his inner progressive sometime...

Yeah, yeah... tall order, but whatever... he won't be president (yet).


[ Parent ]
if Bayh turns out to be the VP ... (4.00 / 1)
which I doubt he'll be ... maybe Evan will some how channel his dad somehow .. but I still say Obama will be choosing the wrong Bayh ... Evan's dad is a lot more proressive .. and still has that fire burning inside

[ Parent ]
Obama picking Bayh (0.00 / 0)
would be like Gore picking Lieberman. No thanks.

Thank Spaghetti I put no stock at all in the "chatter". Obama is going to pick whoever the hell he wants, whenever he wants to.


[ Parent ]
Also mentioned this at MyDD (4.00 / 6)
But all the Bayh and before that Kaine chatter reminds me of Hunter Thompson in Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail (minus the Catholic part):

"It struck me as a cheap and unnecessary concession to the pieced-off ward-heeler syndrome that McGovern had been fighting all along. Tom Eagleton was exactly the kind of VP candidate that Muskie or Humphrey would have chosen: a harmless, Catholic, neo-liberal Rotarian nebbish from one of the border states, who presumably wouldn't make waves. A 'progressives young centrist' with more ambition than brains: Eagleton would have run with anybody.
...
If George gets stomped in November, it will not be because of anything Richard Nixon did to him. The blame will trace straight back to his brain-trust, to whoever had his ear tight enough to convince him that all that bullshit about "new politics" was fine for the primaries, but it would never work against Nixon-so he would have to abandon his original power base...and swiftly move to consolidate the one he'd just shattered: the Meany/Daley/Humphrey/Muskie axis, the senile remnants of the Democratic Party's once-powerful 'Roosevelt Coalition'"

John McCain opposes the GI Bill.


[ Parent ]
Good find (0.00 / 0)
Hunter speaks truth from the grave.

[ Parent ]
A shame what happened with him (0.00 / 0)
You would think he would want to be around to see one more history-making election.  

"Don't hate the media, become the media" -Jello Biafra

[ Parent ]
I smell a Rosenberg reply coming .... ;-) (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
If only =) (4.00 / 1)


John McCain opposes the GI Bill.

[ Parent ]
Not only is Bayh a weak #2 (4.00 / 2)
he'll make Obama look extremely weak, which is already a rapidly growing problem. Bayh magnifies all of Obama's perceived weaknesses and gives the impression that Obama is trying to compensate for them. Obama has already made it extremely difficult to continue selling him as an authentic, principled politician. It will be 10 times harder if he selects a pro-war DLC Clintonite to be his VP. This will also continue undermining efforts to expose McCain as a habitual flip-flopper. Rather than attacking McCain for selling out his principles, Obama has apparently decided to follow him.

[ Parent ]
Bayh would suck and be fine at same time (0.00 / 0)
I doubt he's the pick.  My thinking is that he'd be bad for progressivism, but he also won't hurt the race.  If 23,000 voters nationwide defect to Nader because Bayh's on the ticket, oh well.   If his numbers are that good, I'd happily take him if he delivered Indiana and nobody else could deliver a state.

Then, it's an 8 Year Pressure Vise to get him to move ideologically and/or find a decent challenger for 2016.  Or, if we get lucky, so much gets done in 8 years we won't even mind having him as a nominee.  He's probably malleable, like any ambitious politician.


[ Parent ]
It is interesting that in both 2000 and 2004, (0.00 / 0)
major, significant movement in the polls in both cases began right about... now. I wonder if we'll see that replicated.

Did Gore have a good turnout operation in 2000? It is curious that Gore outperformed his final polling by quite a significant margin, while Kerry underperformed his. If organization is a plausible reason, that gives me much better hope for Obama's chances in 2008. (In the primary campaign (or at least the latter half), in states with primaries and not caucuses, all of Obama's vaunted organizing didn't seem to budge the results very much -- to be fair, neither did flooding the airwaves with ads. Which makes me wonder how well all the effort and resources the Obama campaign is putting into organizing for the general is going to pay off, given that it's not going to be a caucus.)


People were motivated in 2004... (4.00 / 1)
...on both sides. But perhaps more motivated on the right, considering all the jingoistic fervor at the time.
I have heard 2004 referred to many times as the high water mark of evangelical turnout, a phenomenon that McCain would be hard-pressed to mimic. Perhaps that is the cause of Bush's over-performance.

At least we can look forward to a new high-water mark for black voter turnout, and with a little luck, young voters too.  

"Don't hate the media, become the media" -Jello Biafra


[ Parent ]
In the last month, Obama has... (4.00 / 4)

 - repeatedly praised John McCain as an "honorable" man while leaving Democrats like Wes Clark hanging out to dry
 - moved to the right on drilling
 - moved to the right on FISA
 - sat idly by as McCain questioned his patriotism
 - sat idly by as McCain launched a barrage of libelous attack ads
 - failed to expose any of McCain's many weaknesses

 All this after insisting that he would not be swiftboated.

 Gee, I can't imagine why he's not leaving McCain in the dust. He's done all the right DLC things! And their way always works.

 

"We judge ourselves by our ideals; others by their actions. It is a great convenience." -- Howard Zinn


Huh? (0.00 / 0)
When did he insist he wouldn't be swiftboated?  Actually, I recall him saying several times that he would be, and that he'd be ready.  That appears to be what he was wrong about... not because he's not really responding, but because he refuses to respond in kind.

Here's the thing.. .people hate politicians... rightly or wrongly, they already expect this kind of bullshit in the campaigns.  They'll say over and over again that they hate it, yet they're still influenced by it.  People expect a dog-fight for the presidency, and if one person doesn't respond... well, we know how that goes.


[ Parent ]
I thought that's what Master Jack meant (4.00 / 3)
That Obama wouldn't let them get away with swiftboating like Kerry did. But he's doing precisely that. I wouldn't say he needs need to respond in kind, but he does need to stop pretending people will see through the BS and that this election will be won on issues. These things would be true if we had a responsible news media that actually covered issues. But we don't, which is why McCain remains widely viewed as Mr. Moderate Maverick, and why Obama's policy speeches may as well be delivered deep in the forests of the Far East, for all the coverage they get.

Here's the thing.. .people hate politicians... rightly or wrongly, they already expect this kind of bullshit in the campaigns.  They'll say over and over again that they hate it, yet they're still influenced by it.  People expect a dog-fight for the presidency, and if one person doesn't respond... well, we know how that goes.

Exactly. Obama is essentially playing the prevent defense and cementing the narrative that he is weak.


[ Parent ]
Obama can singlehandledly fix opinion and crush McCain? (0.00 / 0)
...he can singlehandedly undo decades of well-funded GOP brainwashing of the public? Of their effective negative branding?

Leaving McCain in the dust is impossible.  You're confusing your head with your heart.

Your order is way too tall.  It will take several cycles.  


[ Parent ]
I'm trying to remind myself.. (0.00 / 0)
...that with the completely pathetic and worthless Kerry campaign, he only needed about 100,000 votes to win the 2004 election... most of them stolen...  I think we can beat that, even though things are just not looking good at all right now...

I hope, at least...  it's the only thing letting me sleep at night...

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


Yeah .. Strickland is gone from Ohio .. (0.00 / 0)
so even if Obama wins all the Kerry states ... plus Ohio .. he wins

[ Parent ]
One thing to note is that this shouldn't be a surprise (4.00 / 1)
McCain has to spend all of his money before the convention I believe.  So you should expect him to spend a lot and get an uptick right now.

The liberal wiki
Send an email to terra@liberalwiki.com


thank you for posting this (4.00 / 1)
this chart more than any polling detail i have seen thus far makes it clear that negative framing by the gop can and has destroyed us. this election is not in the bag by any means. there is a lot of work to do.

Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search