FISA and the draft Democratic Party Platform: is something missing?

by: Aviva

Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 14:17


The draft of the Democratic party platform is out.  Does the section entitled "Reclaiming Our Constitution and Our Liberties" go far enough? How does it compare with Get FISA Right's proposals?

Aviva :: FISA and the draft Democratic Party Platform: is something missing?

I thought it would be interesting to compare the draft platform with the language proposed by Get FISA Right.

 The platform on illegal wiretapping:

We support constitutional protections and judicial oversight on any surveillance program involving Americans. We will review the current Administration’s warrantless wiretapping program. We reject illegal wire-tapping of American citizens.

 

vs. Get FISA Right's proposal:

  • Repeal or substantially amend the FISA Amendments Act, which threatens Fourth Amendment and other fundamental rights. Replace the FISA Amendments Act with a law that restores fundamental rights and holds all parties accountable who violate those rights.
  • Conduct a full investigation of illegal government surveillance programs, make public the legal opinions that justified them, and hold accountable those who ordered illegal warrantless surveillance.
  • Restore the rule of law and end unchecked unitary executive power by bringing to justice all corporate entities, government agencies, and persons who violated the Fourth Amendment and other fundamental rights.

 

The platform on civil liberties as a whole:

We reject the use of national security letters to spy on citizens who are not suspected of a crime. We reject the tracking of citizens who do nothing more than protest a misguided war. We reject torture. We reject sweeping claims of “inherent” presidential power. We will revisit the Patriot Act and overturn unconstitutional executive decisions issued  during the past eight years. We will not use signing statements to nullify or undermine duly enacted law. And we will ensure that law-abiding Americans of any origin,  including Arab-Americans and Muslim-Americans, do not become the scapegoats of national security fears.

 

We will not ship away prisoners in the dead of night to be tortured in far-off countries, or detain without trial or charge prisoners who can and should be brought to justice for their crimes, or maintain a network of secret prisons to jail people beyond the reach of the law. We will respect the time-honored principle of  habeas corpus, the seven century-old right of individuals to challenge the terms of their  own detention that was recently reaffirmed by our Supreme Court. We will close the detention camp in Guantanamo Bay, the location of so many of the worst constitutional  abuses in recent years. 

 

In comparision, Get FISA Right proposed:

  • Stop government practices that violate the constitutionally guaranteed right to free speech, privacy, and due process, including warrantless surveillance on Americans, secret evidence in military courts, torture, illegal imprisonment of U.S. citizens and others, and arbitrary racial and religious profiling.
  • Repeal or substantially amend laws that violate constitutionally guaranteed rights, including the Patriot Act, the FISA Amendments law, the Military Commissions Act, related executive orders, and executive signing statements. Replace these with laws that reaffirm our fundamental rights and hold accountable all parties who violate those rights.
  • Restore constitutional rights that the Bush administration has eroded through its lawless theory of unchecked executive power, including dissent, free speech, assembly, habeas corpus, privacy, due process of law, and equal protection.

 

My comments:

I'm deeply pleased to see that the draft promises to "revisit the Patriot Act", and equally disappointed to see that there is no such promise regarding either the FISA Amendments Act or the Military Commissions Act.   Can our democracy really afford to leave these flawed laws on the books in their current format? 

Although the draft language on wiretapping says all the right things I'm not satisfied by it.  Maybe that's because my Democratic Senator,  who keeps voting the wrong way on FISA,  claims that under the FISA Amendments Act wiretapping is under judicial oversight and in keeping with the Constitution. 

 There's also of course no mention of the issue that perturbed the Democratic base so much - telecom immunity.  A review of what took place is critical, but what happens then? Will the government bureaucrats and political appointees who ordered datamining programs get away with it?

Nor is there any suggestion that we might hold anyone accountable for the torture, the illegal detentions and all the other violations of Constitutional rights.     It's good news that we plan to stop engaging in these activities, but letting those who created and carried out these policies get away with it is unacceptable.  

 


Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
A bit disappointing... (0.00 / 0)
I'm certainly a bit disappointed that the word "FISA" isn't in there. After all, that was one of the hot-button issues this year so far in terms of politics -- it's too bad they didn't confront it head-on.

That said, I, too, am hopeful about the statement: "We will review the current Administration's warrantles wiretapping program."

The key is accountability, making sure that it doesn't drop off the to-do list next year...


Sweeping? (0.00 / 0)
We reject sweeping claims of "inherent" presidential power.

Does that mean we accept claims of "inherent" (i.e. unenumerated) presidential power as long as they aren't sweeping?

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.


Good point ... (0.00 / 0)
hopefully that's not what they mean ...

[ Parent ]
Unfortunately (0.00 / 0)
if Cass Sunstein has any say over this, it is what they mean.  I'd hope than an Obama Administration and the Democratic Congress would reject that view - but I'm not optimistic about it. Don't get me wrong - it would be an improvement to have a president that would exercise these (illegitimate) unenumerated powers in a less sweeping way, and an Obama Administration would in comparison to the Bush Administration. Regardless, the fact that they are not being clear about what they mean is troubling.

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.

[ Parent ]
Netroots Platform Still to be Incorporated (0.00 / 0)
I believe the Netroots Platform has not been incorporated in the Democratic Party Platform Draft, yet.  GET FISA RIGHT is included in the Civil Rights Plank of the Netroots Platform:  http://www.mixedink.com/netroo...

I would "hope" the DNC will integrate the Netroots Platform as indicated by the Netroots Platform Committee:  http://www.dailykos.com/story/...


Help safeguard the people's rights under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.  Get FISA Right!


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox