Josh Marshall & Digby: Obama has no theme/message

by: Steve in Sacto

Tue Aug 19, 2008 at 19:27


If two of the smartest people on the political Internets cannot discern any identifiable "clear message" coming from the Obama campaign how will the typical low/medium information voter figure it out?

Josh Marshall:

From Obama, honestly, I don't sense a really clear message. There are attacks on McCain, some of which are quite good. There are positive uplifting commercials. And there are ads/messages targeted to particular states -- like Yucca Mountain in Nevada and the DHL layoffs in Ohio. But it's hard for me to come up with a clear cut Obama message in way that it's pretty simple for me to do with McCain. Even the 'change' message, which is the basis of Obama's campaign, seems much more diffuse to me than it was during the primaries.

Digby:

...the central problem for the campaign is that nobody knows what Obama stands for. It's a perennial problem for Democrats, but I think it may be an even bigger problem this time. The hope and change theme was galvanizing in the beginning but it isn't enough to sustain full campaign. What was once inspiring has become a fog.
Steve in Sacto :: Josh Marshall & Digby: Obama has no theme/message

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
The problem is the framing of the message (4.00 / 1)
It appears to me that there are clear themes underlying his approach, it is just that there is a lack of adequate framing, especially in soundbite terms.

Here is my attempt at a 10-word soundbite summary of Obama's platform, and why I see these as consistent themes underlying his policies.

Green jobs.  Wall Street for Main Street.  Integrity.

These three add up to "change you can believe in".

Green jobs is a single convergent solution to the three major issues: energy, economy and climate change.  Contrasts strongly with "drill, drill, drill" and other nonsolutions and inaction of Bush/McCain.

Reagan trickle-down economics was "Main Street through Wall Street" - give tax cuts and subsidies to corporates and rich people, and eventually others would benefit.  As Obama says, this is a failed economic policy, obvious from 40 years of flat real income growth for the bottom 90%.  Obama's policies and rhetoric are consistently about "Wall Street working for Main Street", pushing them to prosper in ways that do not hurt people:

Universal health care approach is about ensuring that companies do not reject those with pre-existing conditions or actual health problems, utilizing competition to deliver better care within pricing constraints.  Free trade is OK only if worker interests are protected.  No tax breaks if jobs are moved offshore.  Regulate financial industry to eliminate deception and exploitation.  McCain's school vouchers would allow private schools to cherry-pick the rich and brighter students, while the public school system suffers, whereas merit pay is about rewarding excellence while not defunding schools based on test scores.  This is a consistent theme of encouraging enterprise and economic activity while constraining it to be beneficial to people: Wall Street for Main Street.

Integrity includes no character assassination, integrity of Government, and integrity of policy making in terms of pursuing broad consensus rather than blindly pushing partisan agendas (non-partisan, not bi-partisan).

This covers nearly all aspects of the core platform other than Iraq War.  Perhaps it should be "Integrity and Judgment".

So I believe there is a consistent theme/message that has not been articulated in soundbite terms.  Whether the campaign does so or not, the netroots can identify and push soundbite versions of the core themes (and perhaps suggest them to the campaign as well).



USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox