A close-up view of an Obama women's outreach event

by: desmoinesdem

Thu Aug 21, 2008 at 16:00


I don't see much evidence that Barack Obama has a problem with women voters. He leads among women by more than Al Gore or John Kerry did at the same time during their own presidential campaigns. The most recent Iowa poll shows Obama leading by six overall but by 12 among Iowa women.

Among purveyors of conventional wisdom, however, there is still a perception that Obama has work to do among women voters, and particularly the women who preferred Hillary Clinton in the primaries.

The Obama campaign has been scheduling women's outreach events to address this issue. Today Governor Kathleen Sebelius is campaigning around central Iowa, and one of her appearances is a lunch in Des Moines specifically geared toward women.

Last Friday I attended a different women's event featuring Dana Singiser. She served as Director of Women's Outreach for Clinton's presidential campaign before joining the Obama campaign as Senior Adviser for the Women's Vote.

Singiser wrote an Obama campaign memo on John McCain's "woman problem," released earlier this week.

Join me after the jump for more.

desmoinesdem :: A close-up view of an Obama women's outreach event
The Obama campaign is pitching these events as discussions of "economic security" rather than "women's issues." The media advisory before Singiser arrived in Iowa noted, "Singiser will discuss Senator Obama's plan to provide economic security for America's working women." Similarly, the statement announcing Sebelius's schedule in Iowa states, "Governor Sebelius to speak at a women's brown bag lunch about pay equity and Senator Obama's plan to strengthen economic security for America's women."

The Obama campaign wisely scheduled Singiser to speak in areas where Hillary did well in the Iowa caucuses. On August 14, she headlined events in Sioux City (Woodbury County) and Council Bluffs (Pottawattamie County), and the next day she spoke at a women's lunch in Boone (Boone County). Clinton won all of those counties, and Obama finished third in Boone and Pottawattamie.

I saw Singiser in the Des Moines suburbs just before she headed to Boone for lunch. She spoke in the same backyard where Michelle Obama addressed Polk County women Democrats a year ago.

A show of hands revealed that about half of the 30 to 35 women attending had caucused for Obama, and half had caucused for a different candidate. I recognized two other volunteers for John Edwards and three women I know who were precinct captains for Hillary.

A social worker and well-known Democratic activist in Polk County introduced Singiser. She had been very active in the Clinton campaign and explained that she was now volunteering for Obama because we can't afford another four years of George Bush, and because "When women vote, Democrats win."

Singiser began by talking about her transition from working for Hillary for five years (on her Senate staff before joining the presidential campaign). If you're wondering how she could switch to Obama, she joked, you're not alone, because her mother asked the very same question.

She explained that the same reasons she supported Hillary are why she's supporting Obama. Going over a few of the things Hillary stood for, Singiser added, "I trust Senator Obama to fight these same fights for me as well." She paraphrased Obama's comments to some 2,000 Clinton supporters in New York after the primaries. According to Singiser, Obama told that gathering what Hillary's candidacy had meant to his own daughters, who would never have to wonder whether a woman could become president. He also noted that the primaries incited passion, which is something to celebrate even if that passion is not automatically transferable.

Singiser mentioned former Republican Congressman Jim Leach's recent endorsement of Obama as proof that the Democratic nominee can bring together people of different partisan backgrounds.

She then catalogued the "stark differences" between Obama and John McCain on economic policy, Social Security, retirement savings, and equal pay for women. After telling the story of Lilly Ledbetter and the Supreme Court's horrible ruling denying her legal redress for discrimination, Singiser noted that McCain opposed the Lilly Ledbetter act in the Senate.

She emphasized that the Supreme Court is not just important for Roe v Wade, but also for many other things affecting women. (Note: that was the only glancing reference to reproductive rights during this event.)

Singiser then contrasted Obama's health care plan with McCain's, which won't make a dent in the number of Americans lacking health insurance. She wrapped up by saying that Barack Obama's positions on so many of the issues important to her are shaped by the strong women in his life, like his wife, mother and grandmother. With only 80 days left before the election, there's a lot of work to do, and four more years of a Bush administration would be devastating for women.

Singiser then took questions for about 15 minutes. Most of the questions were about Obama's policies (immigration, foreign affairs, climate change). I asked her why Clinton supporters should volunteer for Obama, given the outpouring of hatred toward Hillary during the primaries. She deflected this with an answer about rampant sexism in the media, exemplified by commentators like Chris Matthews.

I followed up to ask about the way the Obama campaign frequently put the most negative interpretation possible on things Bill and Hillary said during the primaries. Why should a Clinton supporter now volunteer for Obama rather than for one of our down-ticket Democratic candidates?

Singiser downplayed the significance of the hardball politics during the primaries (there was "not much that happened during the primary season that I found really distasteful") and said Clinton and Obama had incredibly substantive debates over the issues. She added that if we don't elect Senator Obama, there won't be a friendly environment for our Democratic Congress to work in.

After a few more questions about Obama's policies, Singiser asked us all to keep in mind the power of women's friendships and social connections. We may get news from the media, but we count on our girlfriends to help us make really important decisions, such as which doctor to choose for our children.

She urged everyone present to talk to their friends, relatives and neighbors about why they are supporting Obama for president, because those contacts will be more important than anything phone-bankers and canvassers can say to voters.

All in all, I thought Singiser's presentation, like the memo she wrote on John McCain's "woman problem," made an effective case for Obama as the superior candidate for American women.

I am biased because she hit many points I recommend that Obama volunteers use when speaking to former Clinton supporters. She acknowledged that enthusiastic Clinton supporters may have trouble transferring that passion to Obama, she spelled out why Obama is so much better than McCain, and she pointed out that Hillary accomplished something for women by running, even though she did not win.

Singiser's longstanding ties to Clinton made her a better messenger on all of these points than a someone who had supported Obama all along could be. I don't know whether she converted any of the women present from reluctant Obama voters into Obama donors or volunteers, but she did an excellent job. I would recommend that the campaign keep putting her in front of women audiences around the country.


Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
No offense... (0.00 / 0)
but those are some loaded questions.  

are you talking about the questions I asked her? (4.00 / 2)
A lot of women who backed Hillary are going to vote for Obama but not lift a finger to help him because they are mad about stuff that happened during the primaries.

So, I was curious to hear how a longtime Clinton supporter would answer those questions.

These events are specifically intended to get women more involved with the Obama campaign.

Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.


[ Parent ]
Thanks for the questions (4.00 / 2)
While the questions may seem loaded, I think they were good, and wish they hadn't been deflected.  Maybe she deflected because those are her feelings as well.  But here are my answers (as an Obama supporter from the start):

I asked her why Clinton supporters should volunteer for Obama, given the outpouring of hatred toward Hillary during the primaries.

The reverse it true.  Why should Obama reach out for Hillary given the numerous talking points she gave to the Republicans in her quest to win?  Answer on both sides - the stakes are too high to hold grudges.  On women's issues, on bread and butter issues, and on national security issues - McCain's candidacy is a real threat to the country - and he must be defeated.  All hands are needed on deck.

I followed up to ask about the way the Obama campaign frequently put the most negative interpretation possible on things Bill and Hillary said during the primaries. Why should a Clinton supporter now volunteer for Obama rather than for one of our down-ticket Democratic candidates?

It's a debatable point that Obama chose the most negative interpretation possible - but the issues raised (racism, sexism, classism) are part of what is historic for this time - and neither Hillary nor Barack are immune from the sensitivities evoked.  But when thinking about the future of the country, and the good of the party - Barack is leading by example - he isn't just building to support his candidate - he's working to support down-ticket Democrats as well.  It's not an either-or proposition.  Help in any way you can.

QT

Visit the Obama Project


WindOnWater.net




[ Parent ]
just a few examples (4.00 / 2)
When Bill said the idea of Obama being a consistent opponent of the war was a fairy tale, the Obama campaign in South Carolina put out a memo making that out to be a racially insensitive comment. Then Obama surrogates made it sound like Bill had said it was a fairy tale to think a black man could be elected president.

When Bill said it would be nice just to have an election with two people who love their country, talking about the issues, the Obama campaign twisted that into Bill attacking Obama's patriotism.

When Hillary made an electability argument in less-than-ideal terms, the Obama campaign and its supporters in the blogosphere repeated ad nauseum that she had "endorsed" McCain --even though she had said clearly earlier in the year that she would support the Democratic nominee.

That is the kind of thing I am talking about, and some Clinton supporters are still very pissed off about it.

I agree with you that if Hillary had won the nomination, she would have had a lot of fence-mending to do as well.

Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.


[ Parent ]
Are you serious??? (4.00 / 1)
"Why should Obama reach out for Hillary given the numerous talking points she gave to the Republicans in her quest to win?"
Come on, now, do you think it's poosible he really wants to win the election, and knows that he needs Hillary's supporters to get a majority???
|-(

[ Parent ]
You missed the point almost entirely (4.00 / 1)
[ Parent ]
Very uplifting! (4.00 / 2)
Thx for that report. However, it would be even better if Obama himself would speak more about women's issues.  

Talking "points" won't do... (4.00 / 1)
The Pew survey would have been more informative had they extended it to self-identified feminists, not just women. And further, if they had weighted in the Obama-McCain overall support numbers as also the general GOP popularity ones. In other words, how much of Obama's better numbers among women is a result of his (or the Dem's) better numbers overall given the dismal state of the GOP (and to a lesser extent, the McCain alternative). Why should that matter? It might, because: while absolute numbers are important, the final word goes to the final absolute count -- the total number of votes. The critical question for Obama vis-a-vis pissed of women and feminists is how much is the fact that we are pissed off depress his tally and how could that contribute to the result.

As another commentor notes, Obama needs to start talking directly to feminists. Not send "surrogates" (to repeat that recently much-abused term) to targeted forums. As Roseanne Barr writes in her blog:

they are going to make hillary turn over all her delegates BEFORE the vote. It's all a set up to get the females to think that they are being listened to, but it's all planned canned and fixed. Obama is the nom, and there is no getting rid of him for the dems. If he had any brains he would announce right now that a vote for him is a vote for hillary, because she is his choice for vice, or his nominee for the supreme court...some triangulation would work for him. He has a blindspot where feminism and females are concerned, and he figures that claire mccaskill (sp) is all he needs. (kind of like when people say..."i asked my maid what she thinks of immigration, and she said".....). He just doesn't get it that it is female boomers that have kept the dem party alive since the sixties, and that he has insulted their intelligence. He just doesn't get it, and neither does david axelrod. I do not think any men get it at all. As it was for me in Hollywoodland, men in power are not comfortable with any woman that is not serving them coffee.



Thanks so much for posting this. (0.00 / 0)
And for the questions you asked -- if only we could send you and QT on the road to get the message out.

John McCain thinks we haven't spent enough time in Iraq

USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox