Different Than My Small-Town Values

by: Mike Lux

Thu Sep 04, 2008 at 13:38


Cross-posted at Huffington Post

I was born and raised in Nebraska, and my wife grew up on a farm her brother and father still live on. It's four miles away from Westboro, MO, a town whose population has sunk below 200 many years ago. Before being pulled to the Washington, D.C. area because of my work a few years back, my wife and I had never lived in a town over the size of 200,000, and we're still most at home when hanging out with the family and friends back home at small-town cafes and restaurants that were favorite haunts as we were growing up. My brother is a Methodist minister serving a church in Lincoln now, but I miss the days when we could drive out to visit him in churches in places like Mullen, North Platte and Broken Bow, Nebraska.

I go through all this biographical background as a way of getting to this point: while I appreciated Sarah Palin's tribute to small-town values at one point in her speech, the values she exhibited in the rest of the speech were not the ones I recognized from the small towns I know. Her sarcasm, even downright nastiness at times, is not representative of the people I grew up with and still love.

More in the extended entry.

Mike Lux :: Different Than My Small-Town Values
My wife, although she loves her small-town roots as I do, always reminds me not to romanticize small-town America. It is true, people sometimes gossip too much about each other there, and I've known some cruel and close-minded folks who live in small towns, just like there are cruel and close-minded folks everywhere you go. But I grew up in a family, church, and community where we were taught to look out for each other, to be kind to one another, to help out the families in our community who were down on their luck. The Sarah Palin I saw last night had a mean streak a mile wide. If me or my brothers and sisters would have been as sarcastic and demeaning to someone as Sarah Palin was last night, my mom would have sent us to our room. I know that Palin was just trying to be funny when she compared herself to a pit bull, but she was just about as nasty as one, and in the dog-loving families I know from small-town America, people generally prefer dogs that will play well with kids and neighbors. And the community organizers that Palin made so much fun of the folks who organized the potluck suppers at church and the Lions Club charities, the ones who really made those small towns go.

Many of my family and friends in small-town America are Republicans, but they're generally not this kind of mean Republican. The modern Republican party likes to call itself the party of Reagan, and Reagan did remind me of a lot of those small-town folks I know and liked- I disagreed with their politics, but they had a friendliness and warmth that I appreciated. Palin and the modern Republican party reminds me a lot more of Nixon, with that dark, resentful streak, more likely to stick a knife in their neighbor's back than give them a helping hand.

I feel like this election is coming down to a choice between candidates who wants to lift the country up and have them look to the future with hope and optimism, and a party that wants to drag us back to the resentments and fears of the past.

The Sarah Palin of last night, who claims to be the ultimate representative of small-town America, is anything but, because the small-town folks I know actually look out for each other.


Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Those are 'American' values, not (4.00 / 7)
just 'small-town' values.

And while being sarcastic and demeaning aren't among them,  neither is out-and-out lying. You can't even call it being mistaken.

1) Palin made claims about her opposition to the Bridge to Nowhere.
2) Those claims were proven false.
3) Palin repeated those claims in front of a larger audience.

That's lying. She's a liar. She lied and knew she was lying, and the media knew she was lying, and every informed person knew she was lying, and she still lied! At least she's a committed liar.

But I don't understand that decision, strategically. Some kind of odd 'dare' to the media?


Mike .. (4.00 / 5)
is it me .. or was her speech all about talking to the base? .. where are they going to find the new voters that are required giving speeches like last night? .. I've read a couple of different stories  .. where some newspapers had independents watch .. and give their reaction .. and it seems like independents hated the speech ...  because it was as you say ... this was her first introduction to America at large .. and you don't start attacking people the first time you meet them

Agreed, she did not speak to the undecided (4.00 / 4)
So I repeat again, this speech did not closwe the gap with Obama. It reinforced the base. It may affect the vote for third party candidates, with Barr no longer getting an even-more-right-wing-than-thou vote, but its not an effective speech for the indies. In fact McCain may fall tomorrow.

Perfect catch Mike:

Her sarcasm, even downright nastiness at times, is not representative of the people I grew up with and still love.

 

Change
"We must break up the banks and never again let them get so big that they distort our politics and take down the economy.


[ Parent ]
My comment, exactly (0.00 / 0)
Oh, the grammarian in me...

Soldiers are required to do their jobs when politicians fail to do theirs.

[ Parent ]
That's the reaction (4.00 / 3)
I've seen; independents, though sometimes impressed, seem to have been turned off by the sarcasm. In any case, her task was to try to frame Obama negatively. The question, as you say, is whether an unknown, no matter how skillful, can be an effective attack-dog. McCain's speechwriters might have done us a service by giving her too many snide attack lines.

But I have to say, it's a measure of her performance that the conversation has turned in 12 hours from will-she-withdraw? to did-she-hit-a-home run?


[ Parent ]
She's gotten an ample assist from the media (0.00 / 0)

  They COULD have framed her speech as a base-pleasing Limbaugh rant (which it was) and left it at that, continuing to focus on her many lies and hypocrisies, which remain relevant to her character and qualifications.

  But no, they just had to gush about her. Even NPR this morning -- nothing but praise. One wonders if the brief period of actual investigative journalism we saw earlier in the week was nothing more than an elaborate setup.  

"We judge ourselves by our ideals; others by their actions. It is a great convenience." -- Howard Zinn


[ Parent ]
My two-person sample. (4.00 / 8)
Repub male who works near me was unimpressed--thinks she's just a bomb thrower and not ready for the job--and an independent (very religious) woman who sits near me thinks she was mean spirited.

Have to say, I was relieved. The Corporate Media got me believing that it was the greatest speech of all time.


[ Parent ]
I just spoke to a Doctor who I went to high school with, who I serve on a (4.00 / 4)
committee with( community organizers that we are:),and she was appalled at that speech.

She is an independent, her husband Republican - and she wants the Obama campaign to vigorously defends itself and not to let up on Sarah Palin's dismal record or McSame's judgment in naming her his VP

That speech decided this woman for Obama and she wants me to get her an Obama bumper sticker


[ Parent ]
Trying. (0.00 / 0)
She was trying to do more than that, but I think she failed.

[ Parent ]
when she said community activist (4.00 / 8)
she wasn't talking about the ladies who organize church potlucks in small towns.

I tend to agree with billmon:

Used the way the GOP speakers used the words tonight (i.e. with a sneer), community = ghetto and organizer = activist.

It essentially was a coded way of pointing out Obama's work in, with and for the black community (see? even I'm doing it) on the South Side of Chicago. Also the fact that his work involved helping low-income people stand up for their legal rights, as opposed to a GOP-sanctioned "real" job like business owner or career military officer (or moose hunter.) They were trying to put Obama back on the same level as Jesse Jackson -- i.e., the black protest candidate -- and mocking him for it.



Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.

Yeah I got the same read (4.00 / 5)
I believe that is what is known as "dog whistle" politics, a favorite tactic of Rove et al.

[ Parent ]
but if people don't hear the whistle, it doesn't work. (4.00 / 5)
i grew up in gettysburg, pa.  a small, almost entirely white, town.  the community organizers i knew weren't all organizing potlucks, to be sure, but they were widely respected in town, by all but the most hardened wingers.  i agree with mike -- the community organizer attacks will likely backfire.

[ Parent ]
ditto heads talking to ditto heads (4.00 / 1)
I caught a few minutes of Limbaugh in my car today. He bragged about how he has been explaining on his show for months that "community organizer" means criminal negro. What seemed utterly mystifying to me last night makes perfect sense now. The convention hall was full of ditto heads who have been "educated" by Limbaugh to feel the proper visceral contempt for "community organizers." I can only hope that most voters had the same confused and appalled reaction that I had to the Rudy and Palin speeches.

The bottom line is that "small town values" is code for racism. McCain has chosen to run a standard issue conservative campaign, the underlying message being, "All those liberals look down on us "normal" Americans just because we don't like negroes. Are we going to take that from those elitists who think they're better than us just because they don't dislike negroes like we do?"

miasmo.com


[ Parent ]
Disagree. (0.00 / 0)
I don't believe that small town values is code for racism. It's just a way of viewing the world that comes from living in a small town, and it doesn't have to be racist.

[ Parent ]
small town values vs "small town values" (0.00 / 0)
I am not talking about the actual values of people who live in small towns. Those values run the gamut just like people in big cities and suburbs. I am talking about "small town values" as a rhetorical gimmick used by Republicans. The marketing of the fetishization of "small town values" as a representation of Normal (heterosexual white christian) versus Other.

miasmo.com

[ Parent ]
Man what a chip (0.00 / 0)
You seriously need someone to knock that planet sized chip off your shoulder....racism? ...love of country, proud of service, hard working people just wanting what everyone else wants have exactly what to do with racism?

Let me clue you in....people like you who walk around with this 24 hour a day victim sign on their chest create racism. Racism from ignorant whites and from ignorant blacks.

Get away from whatever college professor is brainwashing you and grow up.


[ Parent ]
You are naive. (0.00 / 0)
Get away from whatever college professor is brainwashing you and grow up.

No college professor ever said anything to me related to my comment above. It is my own opinion from watching Republican campaign rhetoric on TV.

Let me clue you in....people like you who walk around with this 24 hour a day victim sign on their chest create racism. Racism from ignorant whites and from ignorant blacks.

Let me clue you in: I am a member of the demographic known as "white males." I really don't feel like a victim of anything besides harmful conservative policies.

So you think racism is created by people pointing out racism? That is such a fucking cop out, such a bullshit rationalization for clinging to racism.

Let me relate a little anecdote:

Last night I was talking to a cab driver who told me about a couple from Baton Rouge who recently rode in her cab. She asked them how they liked Atlanta to which they replied that there were too many Democrats. When she responded that Georgia is actually a very Republican state, they clarified their comment by telling her that by Democrats they meant "niggers." Yes, that is actually the word they used.

When a political party demonizes liberals for looking down on "small town values," what are they talking about? Why does this rhetoric work on a big chunk of the population? Are people in small towns really resentful of people who eat arugula and drink orange juice instead of coffee? Do you and your fellow liberals really look down on "love of country, proud of service, hard working people just wanting what everyone else wants"? Nonsense.  

miasmo.com


[ Parent ]
Exactly how I saw it too (4.00 / 4)
I grew up on a farm in Illinois and it was probably 60% republican community. Her speech last night did not reflect the fabled "small town values". It was all snide, sarcastic, resentment. She seemed to be talking down to everyone, not just Obama or democrats.

It was like she was head of the kewl kidz in school and they'd decided to pick on someone just to be mean. Maybe that's why the media lapped it up, but (hopefully) most Americans didn't.

I don't like Laura Bush, but most others do, and Laura Bush she was not.  


I don't remember .. (0.00 / 0)
Laura Bush ever being like Palin was last night though .. was Laura Bush ever snide and sarcastic like that?

[ Parent ]
she's not running to be First Lady (4.00 / 1)
she is running to be Vice President.

And yes, I do know a Vice President who is snide, sarcastic, and resentful.

Not really sure why she would be compared to Laura instead of Dick.


[ Parent ]
Oh I know that (0.00 / 0)
I'm just making a comparison to what people I grew up with are likely to compare her to in terms of the only other republican woman they are familiar with at this point.

Plus, I don't even think Cheney was that bad (more evil, but not that bad in a speech). This was just cartoonish over the top smugness. Well....maybe Cheney WAS that bad.  


[ Parent ]
No that's why I said that (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
This discription might have legs. (4.00 / 1)
It was like she was head of the kewl kidz in school and they'd decided to pick on someone just to be mean.

I think it needs repeating, maybe in the local papers across the land.
Nasty, mean spirited, exactly the kind of speech the Bushites have been giving for 20 years thats why we have Bush.

Well I have an hour, might as well take some to spread it. I could use some help. Here's how.

Change
"We must break up the banks and never again let them get so big that they distort our politics and take down the economy.


[ Parent ]
What an interesting idea! :) (0.00 / 0)
I'll update tomorrow. I know I've been slacking on that lately. Work and volunteering have been eating up my time more than usual. But I'll definitely have new articles for tomorrow.

[ Parent ]
Small town values (4.00 / 2)
I, unfortunately, live in a town the size of Palin's community in the South, and, yes, her values are those you most typically find down here. Anti-intellectualism, flat-earth biblical literalists, attack dogs for the GOP and Southern Baptist establishment, they're all here.

I'm glad to know that all small towns aren't like this, but most of them, at least south of Mason-Dixon, are, and these are the folks Palin was chosen to get fired up.

Given the place of the Southern Baptist community in the GOP, she was an excellent, and representative, choice. They've always been less concerned with the morality of the politician than they are excited by the chance to impose their values in a universal non-fundamentalist/literalist pogrom. Mencken knew of what he spoke in the Scopes Trial writings. I've even lived within spitting distance of the Scopes trial town, and it hasn't changed a bit, just sitting there awaiting the rise of another Bryan (maybe one named Palin?)

Get used to it, until the schools down here are made to educate instead of let choose their own courses of study, the South is a third world country, at least intellectually.  


People are reacting to the harshness and dishonesty of the attack . . . (4.00 / 1)
. . . that Bush's speech writers wrote for her. It is not the values she could have defended, it is the mean sarcastic even nasty way she tried to bring down Obama, and all people just trying to help out in their community.

These people are often unpaid, or its a second job, or they have given up far higher paying jobs for a summer or a few years of building up communities. hell the first speaker I saw on the stage (does anyone know if she was first?) was a young woman, girl, who spoke proudly of helping to make housing available for people unable to  purchase in the market. Was she castigated too? Is she supposed to feel bad about her efforts?

It was the wrong speech, as I think America is deciding today. I don't think she can come back from this.

Her viciousness also left her open for some pretty scathing words and criticism. What goes around, Sarah, comes around.

For example Sarah Palin is a liar; she worked hard for all the pork barrel 'earmark' benefits she could get, even hiring lobbyists to help get them delivered, even raising their wage for early successes. She thought it funny and made jokes about it. She said in her acceptance speech that she is a reformer and was always opposed to earmarks and federal bridges to nowhere. Crowed about, patted herself on the back. And was all a lie.

Change
"We must break up the banks and never again let them get so big that they distort our politics and take down the economy.


[ Parent ]
Because (4.00 / 1)
She doesn't represent America's small communities. She represents America's gated communities.

She's a fraud.


Mike, the title of your post (4.00 / 3)
strikes me as a good theme for an Obama-Biden ad.  It might include comments like yours from "regular" folks, tie them into key issues impacting small town America, and convey a strong, clear (and true) impression that the Republican party of McCain-Palin-Bush-Cheney-Rove is mean-spirited, spiteful, dishonest, corrupt, uncaring, etc.  Maybe include a few quotes from her speech and a few key points that highlight the hypocrisy of her and McCain.  And, of course, that McCain voted 90%+ with Bush.  And perhaps a choice quote from an Obama speech, as a point of contrast.

If done skillfully, this has the potential to help carve off more slices of Republicans and Independents from McCain's supporters.  Folks who may have misgivings about Obama and the Dems, but who are tired of and put off by "pit bull" political attacks.

My hope for this campaign (aside from electoral victory) is that it leaves the Republicans with support from only the extreme rightwing that lives on hate disguised as religion and patriotism.  Those folks may be the slowest to come around to the values you cite (and many probably never will), but the key is to have them carved out from the rest of the population in terms of political coalitions.  Sort of a political quarantine, if you will.  And one that will be largely self-created (perhaps with this week's convention as a notable step in that direction).

You raise very important and very strategic points in this post.  I hope the Obama team is thinking along the same lines.


Kevin Drum weighs in on "small town values", too (0.00 / 0)
"Well, on a purely personal note, the most grating part of Palin's speech (and Giuliani's) was their reliance - yet again - on the trope that the only true Americans are those from small towns in the heartland. As a native Californian, that stuff just drives me up the wall. This smoldering esthetic resentment, eagerly stoked by the GOP every fours years since at least Nixon, relies on the myth that us coastal urbanites spend all our time looking down our patrician noses at anyone who lives outside the city limits, and it's dangerous, divisive, and annoying as hell. What's more, as near as I can tell, it's completely backwards. Far from criticizing small town life, America celebrates it. Liberals celebrate it. Politicians celebrate it. Everyone celebrates it. I can hardly turn on the TV without hearing that, compared with the hardworking everymen and women who populate the prairies and put food on our tables, anyone who lives where I do is degenerate, suspiciously cosmopolitan, and one step away from turning the country over to the UN."
http://www.motherjones.com/kev...

And (via Ezra Klein) he cites a Detroit Free Press story on interesting comments made by indepedent voters:
"It appears that once she makes up her mind, that is the end of it....She was a Republican novelty act with a sophomoric script....I still don't know anymore about this young lady tonight than I did last night....Her speech contained few statements about policy or the party platform....I found her barrage of snide remarks and distortions to be a major turn off....I thought she would appear more professional, more stateswomanly. She's no match for Joe Biden."

Let it be said by our children's children that when we were tested, we refused to let this journey end, that we did not turn back, nor did we falter


Apropos "party platform" (0.00 / 0)
Pls read what Canadian "Globe and Mail" has to say about the republican program:
"Hypocrisy is no stranger to politics, and platforms in U.S. politics are written to be ignored. Still, the platform crafted for John McCain shows where he wants to take his party. With a few exceptions, he apparently wants to out-Bush George W. Bush.

Mr. McCain has built part of his reputation on being a straight shooter, a man ready to buck his own party. No more. As candidate, he has bowed to every conservative instinct in the Republican Party, swallowed some of his own positions and, as such, will run on a platform way, way out to the political right."  

And after this, they have some good examples showing that the combination of McCain and the official 2008 GOP preogram boils down to sheer hypocrissy. Read the whole story here:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com...

Btw, German weekly Der Spiegel essentially says the same, but the story is in German language only:
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/...

Imho, not much to fear from this program. This won't win many fans among independents. Really, is it possible that republicans have already resigned and now only try to fire up their own base in order to prevent a devastating landslide?

Let it be said by our children's children that when we were tested, we refused to let this journey end, that we did not turn back, nor did we falter


[ Parent ]
Not being from a small town I can't comment specifically (0.00 / 0)
on "small-town values" (I went to college in a small town that was dominated by the school and where locals and students generally didn't socially mix much, so that doesn't really count). But I'm guessing that they don't include being gratuitously nasty or dismissing the values and accomplishments of people who are different from you or who live in cities.

While it was obviously intentionally manipulative and meant for a certain sort of audience (namely, xenophobic white Christian rural, outer suburban, exurban and small town bigots who harbor resentments towards and a fear of people unlike themselves, who listen to Rush and watch Fox--i.e. "The Base"), Palin's speech last night had absolutely nothing to do with the popular image of "small-town values" that we've seen on many TV shows and read about widely, and which is the operative image of such values among the broader public.

Instead, it was all about "us vs. them", "us" being right-thinking, god-fearing, war-loving, gun-toting, flag-waving, hard-working patriotic white Christian REAL Americans, and "them" being lazy (i.e. black), un-American (Latino), America-hating (liberal elitists), deviant (gays) and devious (Jews) big city folk who are trying to destroy their values and country.

I.e. she inverted the apple pie, homey, aw shucks popular Hollywood image of small town America (which I realize isn't the reality of it) and transformed it into the one portrayed in Inherit the Wind--bigoted, narrow-minded, mean-spirited, stupid, ignorant, intolerant--and then proudly and skillfully rallied the party behind it. It was quite an amazing performance. Too bad Leni Riefenstahl wasn't alive to document it. This was totally her area of expertise.

The base loved it, because they ARE this version of small-town America. But is AMERICA this version of it? I'm not so sure. I think that we're finally started moving beyond it. Not that we were ever completely this version of it, but there was a willingness to embrace this version of it (while at the same time, paradoxically, also embracing that other version of it--weird, like a David Lynch film) from the mid-60's through the mid-90's.

It made a comeback several years ago, but that was short-lived, just long and intense enough to help Bush and the GOP win in '04. But I don't see it working this year, both because it's gotten tiresome and hollow, and because voters have other, more pressing concerns on their minds, like the economy, gas prices, the war, jobs, etc. And last night's speech gave them NOTHING with respect to addressing these issues. So while it might have rallied the base and converted some swing voters, I suspect that it will not only not win over most other swing voters, but will actually backfire and turn them off, both because of its nastiness and negativity, and because it specifically does NOT address these issues.

The country's tired of Elmer Gantry, Joe McCarthy and Richard Nixon-style politics that offer hatred and militarism and little else. It wants something both more hopeful, and more tangible. And Obama, I think, offers both, and the voters know it, even if some of them aren't quite yet ready to admit it to pollsters. There will be a big swing towards Obama during the final few days before the election, and a lot of it will be McCain and Palin's doing.

You go, girl!

The liberal soul shall be made fat. He who waters shall be watered also himself. (Proverbs 11:25)


Smaller town values (0.00 / 1)
I grew up in Newport Maine, population in 1980, the year I left about 3000. You mention the mean streak in Sarah Palin and I can't help but wonder how your community feels about the attacks she has endured over the past days? How does your community feel about the "bitter" comments from the Harvard lawyer? The "America is a downright mean country" comments, How does your communtiy feel about not funding American soldiers who are in battle? Or the vitriol with which your party has attacked the President over the war when a majority of your party gave him permission to fight it?
I would suspect the Sarah Palin who spoke last night was well recieved in most small communities across America. Small communities where people are proud to be American. Communities where people don't particularly agree with elitist snobs and media types who mock them as hicks and losers. I live in small town America and grew up in  smaller town America and as a lifelong democrat I welcome the Sarah Palins of the world with open arms. I don't agree with some policy positions but when I look at the fringe that has destroyed the party of Kennedy, the fringe rioters and anarchists, the General Betrayus fringe, the eight years of  the Clinton, do nothing foriegn policy, which was directly responsible for the 9-11 attacks, the fringe attacks on recruiters and military people....Hell the choice is obvious for this small town American.

Rush? Rush Limbaugh? Is that you? (0.00 / 0)
You've tossed in a lot of assertions and rightwing buzz terms, without providing explanations or links to back any of it up.  OpenLeft ain't the Rush Limbaugh show or World Net Daily.

You've been a good little troll, and I've rated you accordingly.

Keep your mind free and clear, Donna Edwards, and don't sell your soul.


[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search