National Review: Plus ça Change

by: Daniel De Groot

Fri Sep 26, 2008 at 11:54


As part of conservativism's campaign to avoid any blame for this mess falling on its vaunted pillars of deregulation, naked greed and bubblenomics, they have gone back to some golden oldies and are trying to blame uppity minorities for creating the mortgage crisis with all their crazy shiftless dreams of living in a house they own.  This week, the National Review published an editorial on this, and another item from Mark Krikorian.  Today we have Glenn noting that NR is blaming minorities for WaMu's failure.  Paul previously attacked NR in a lengthy but righteous quick hit but this needs more light.

I'd just like to quote the National Review from an editorial published 1957 and remind them to think twice before opening their filthy racist sewer mouths again:


The Central question that emerges--and it is not a parliamentary question or a question that is answered by merely consulting a catalog of the rights of American citizens, born Equal is whether the White community in the South is entitle to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas in which it does not predominate numerically?  The sobering answer is Yes--the White community is so entitled because, for the time being, it is the advanced race...

    National Review believes that the South's premises are correct.  If the majority wills what is socially atavistic, then to thwart the majority may be, though undemocratic, enlightened.  It is more important for any community, anywhere in the world, to afirm and live by civilized standards, than to bow to the demands of the numerical majority.  Sometimes it becomes impossible to assert the will of a minority, in which case it must give way, and the society will regress;  sometimes the numerical minority cannot prevail except by violence: then it must determine whether the prevalence of its will is worth the terrible price of violence.
National Review, Editorial, August 24, 1957 - as quoted in p103 of Conscience of a Liberal by Paul Krugman

I was going to bold the worst parts of the second paragraph, but it's all despicable.  And with the possible exception of overt statements of racism, none of this has changed.  NR still believes the enlightened minority should prevail over the "atavistic" majority, and violence is an acceptable solution to make that happen.  

Daniel De Groot :: National Review: Plus ça Change

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
...plus c'est la même chose (0.00 / 0)
Or, for the not-so-elitist or unfrancophile among us:
The more it changes, the more it stays the same.

Quite true in the case of the NR. Same old racist shit.


Maybe my Canadianism (0.00 / 0)
Showing through.  I take it this phrase is not widely known in the US?  

[ Parent ]
Dunno... (0.00 / 0)
..cause I'm German. And I have had French lessons for four years at school. Mais l'ai oublié tout.
:-)

[ Parent ]
uh, j'ai, not l'ai... (4.00 / 1)
that was a typo. My French is bad, but not SO bad...

[ Parent ]
I think it's fairly well-known... (4.00 / 2)
...among the elitist, latte-sipping liberal set who read this site.

[ Parent ]
lol (4.00 / 1)
But then, of course, for the francophile it's café au lait!

[ Parent ]
However, I don't want to think about... (0.00 / 0)
how US Americans would pronounce that phrase...:shudder:  

[ Parent ]
This is the mainstream conservative view (4.00 / 5)
Still today. They are not politically incorrect or ballsy enough to repeat it quite so explicitly, but their belief in their own enlightened entitlement is real, is dangerous, and needs to be confronted much more directly.

The media, of course, now part of the ruling class and not the rumpled proles they used to be, tend to agree and so cooperate in the disguising of this extremist elitism.

Thanks for the reminder.


Yes (4.00 / 1)
And people talk about neo-conservatives as if they are some special breed apart of conservatives for their belief in the secret special elites who should rule all with their benevolence.  But all they are is exaggerations on existing themes rife throughout conservativism.


[ Parent ]
I'll Have More To Say On This Come The Weekend (4.00 / 2)
The racism is just one facet of their overall worldview, which is basically that they are "the good guys" at war with "the bad guys".  It's all-pervasive.  It's where you get Sarah Palin's blessing by the witch-hunting minister Thomas Muthee, for example.

This sort of thinking is a great way to organize your life, if you've got nothing better to do for several generaiton than carry on family vendettas, like the Hatfields and the McCoys.  But, if you want to run a modern nation-state, then not so much.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


I don't think (4.00 / 1)
They do want to run a "modern nation state" They're feudalists.  

But you're right, the racism here is secondary.  NR is mainly concerned with finding a scapegoat on which to pin the failure of unfettered market capitalism.

I know you've posted that editorial too, but we need to flog this horse until the NR stops publishing filth like this.  I guess it's a sign how desperate the right is to find a rationale for this whole mess that they're sinking back to blaming minorities.  The excuse cubbard is bare.


[ Parent ]
I Mostly Agree (4.00 / 1)
Although I'd put it somewhat differently.

It's sort of like the old blues lyric, "Sister, sister, dirty little sow/Wants to be a bad girl, but she don't know how."

You see, because they're obsessed with controlling everything, they absolutely want to run a "modern nation state."  And if there was a Galactic Federation or an intergallactic empire around, they'd want to run that, too.  But they don't know how.  Which is why every time you get the conservatives totally in charge, you suddenly find yourself face-to-face with the abyss.

Now, I'm not really saying that the white supremacy is secondary, so much as I'm saying that it's just one facet.  You can't readily extract it from all the rest, which you could if it were truly secondary.  But it's the whole ball of wax that really makes it morally abhorent.  At bottom, it's what distinguishes mere clannishness or ethnocentrism from racial supremacism.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
It's good to remember... (0.00 / 0)
What an evil piece of shit Bill Buckley really was, especially after al the moist, rose-tinted obituaries even from liberals following his demise earlier this year.  He never did apologize for being an apologist for the Ku Klux Klan, either.

"A fantasy is not even a wish, much less an act.  There is no such thing as a culpable or shameful fantasy."  -----Lady Sally McGee

Not just racist, but inherently and proudly anti-democratic (0.00 / 0)
There it is, in a nutshell, the foundational principles of the modern conservative movement:

--White people are better and more deserving of privilege than non-white people.

--The will of white people must prevail over the will of the majority.

--Democracy may, in fact must, be subverted, when necessary, to enforce this.

There's another principle, that rich people are better than poor and middle class people. But most conservatives conveniently fail to mention this since they're not THAT stupid, and know that they cannot win without the support of poor and middle class white stupid bigots.

Anyone who feels the need to praise the late Mr. Buckley as a high-minded, civil and principled intellectual, needs to remember that he fundamentally believed in these things. He was, in his heart at least, a traitor to the principles that this country was founded over. To deny that is delusional. He might have been "nice", but in his heart, mind and soul (as it were), Buckley was a rich white privileged bigot and snob. I wish that people stopped pretending otherwise.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox