Iraq, Budgets and Progressivism

by: BillFoster4Congress

Tue Aug 21, 2007 at 12:05


( - promoted by Chris Bowers)

The Right to Respond in this case relates to a post I made on Saturday evening about the IL-14 primary, IL-14: Differentiating Between Blue Dogs and Bush Dogs. In that post, I openly wondered if Bill Foster was positioning himself to become a Bush Dog by announcing his planned affiliation with the Blue Dogs. This is the campaign's response. Judge for yourself if you feel it is adequate--Chris

First, thanks to Chris for the opportunity to tell folks here at OL a little more about myself and about this campaign and to answer some of the concerns raised.

On the campaign trail, I tell voters most often about my background as a scientist and businessman, but I realize that probably doesn't signal as much about my politics and values as some folks in the netroots would appreciate, so before I talk issues, let me talk about my family.

My mom and dad met on Capitol Hill while my mom was working for Senator Paul Douglas of Illinois and my dad was working for Senator Myers of Pennsylvania.  Mom came from a family of inventors and dad was a chemist before taking up what would be one of his many achievements: his work on the civil rights movement.

More in the extended entry.

BillFoster4Congress :: Iraq, Budgets and Progressivism
After dad came back from WWII, he eventually became a lawyer and played a major role in the desegregation of public schools, especially after the passage of the landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act.  He was raised in Tennessee, so he was well suited to bridge the gaps that existed back then when the government imposed new regulations.  You can read more about him (warning, PDF) here.

I grew up in a family deeply involved with Democratic Party politics.  My parents tell me that I had memorized all the names of the 15 or so members of the Dane County Democratic Party when I was toddler -- it was quite a Republican area back then.  I can also remember driving around with mom in a rusty Studebaker with Proxmire for Senate signs. 

And that leads to me this discussion of the Blue Dog label.  You see, I am very concerned about budgetary matters because I have been influenced by people like Bill Proxmire and Paul  Simon.  For a generation, Proxmire was a leading progressive voice in the Senate who also railed against government waste and excessive spending.  You might know Proxmire as the originator of the Golden Fleece Award.  I imagine the Pentagon would have won one for shipping two 19 cent washers for $1,000,000.  Senator Paul Simon famously said, "To be a liberal doesn't mean you're a wastrel," a phrase he adopted from Senator Paul Douglas.

For progressive reasons, we need to deal with debt.  Interest payments eat up an enormous amount of our federal budget every year, and when government can no longer step up to help, it will be the middle class and elderly who suffer.  An out of control deficit threatens Social Security and Medicare.

That's one reason I stood up against some of the more inane tax policies of the Bush administration and joined Responsible Wealth in opposing Estate Tax repeal - a group that includes Bill Gates' father and Paul Newman.  It also shouldn't come as a surprise that Congressman Patrick Murphy, a staunch opponent of the war and a fiscal hawk, joining the Blue Dog caucus has had an effect on me.

I don't believe it's useful to have long discussions on labeling or pigeon-holing and I don't think voters do either.  I certainly do not like to pit Democrats against Democrats, so let me just tell you a couple general stances on a few issues so the netroots can get a feel of what kind of representative I'll be in Congress.

I oppose this administration's policies on Iraq, and have tried to change them - most notably by working long, hard and successfully to get the first and only Iraq War veteran elected to Congress, Patrick Murphy.  I want to work with him to begin bringing our troops home right away and let the Iraqis take control of their country.  I'm a scientist and believe in factual data.  The case this administration has made that the surge is working is not consistent with the available data. 

I oppose this administration and their partners in congress who ran up the debt and are endangering our children's future.  And I'll work with the blue dogs - or any other group in congress who will help change this fiscal recklessness into fiscal responsibility.  Again, one of the great threats to Social Security and Medicare is our system collapsing in debt.

I oppose this administration's circumventing the constitution at every turn when they think it will be politically beneficial to them. I believe Attorney General Gonzalez is a disgrace.  I think my father would be heartbroken and outraged to see a Justice Department that has attempted to systematically dismantle our civil liberties.

Throughout this election season, I intend to put forward my ideas for how we can change what is going on in Washington.  I believe my background and life experiences, coupled with my scientific and business know how, will help bring about the change that voters so desperately want right now.  As our campaign grows, I will reach out more and more to the netroots for advice, support and assistance. 

Taking this seat in 2008 will send the biggest message back to the pundits, the politicos and all the people that for years have given carte blanche to the policies of George W. Bush. 

If you also want to send them that message, then join us.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Would you have voted (4.00 / 1)
For the last FISA modification bill?

For the Iraq supplemental with a withdrawal timetable?

For the second supplemental that did not have a timetable?

For Chris Dodd's habeas restoration act?

Your positions above do not make these clear.  These are lynchpins, and I think, rightly so.

The problem most of us have with the blue dogs is that they cave in to Bush's fearmongering and give him whatever he claims he needs to "fight terrorism."  Either they really believe in his general approach to terrorism or they're just scared they'll be blamed if there's another attack.  Either way is bad. 

We want Democrats who will stand up to the fearmongering and take the risk that maintaining civil rights is worth risking a terrorist strike in the longer haul.


Please clarify (0.00 / 0)
Over at PrairieStateBlue, billfoster4congress is "Tom" a campaign staffer. Is that the case here?

Jeff Wegerson

When I met Mr Foster at TBA (0.00 / 0)
he discussed his plan to enter the race in IL 14 and attempted to get me to switch my allegiance from another candidate to his run. One thing that struck me was that he did not live in IL 14 and was just - at that point - making plans to move back for the run.

I'm curious how long Mr. Foster has actually lived as an adult in the district he now wishes to represent - rather than in Washington, DC or other locations.


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox