Most Important Races Beyond the Presidential

by: Mike Lux

Wed Oct 15, 2008 at 15:30


Given my theory spelled out in Tuesday's post about prioritizing hard to win races so that we have a chance at a real governing majority, and given that I have been only writing about Presidential politics lately, I thought it was time to update my most important non-Presidential races list.
Mike Lux :: Most Important Races Beyond the Presidential
I'm still putting Darcy Burner at the top even though she's been one of the early swing races identified by the DCCC and everyone else (and it is great news that, as Matt points out, there is another poll showing her in the lead). She is both a symbol of all that is good about the progressive political movement, and one of the smartest substantive people running for office- any office- this year. She would be one of the best young progressive leaders in government.

The only other House races I would put in my highest priority category are a pair of VA candidates, Judy Feder and Tom Perriello. Both are great candidates, real stars who would be leaders in Congress, in tough districts made easier by the Democratic tide. And VA is a really important swing state in Presidential politics, so helping them is a twofer.

Next category: getting to 60. It is extremely likely at this point that we win the seats we've been ahead in all year long- Warner in VA, Shaheen in NH, the Udalls in CO and NM. Those campaigns should take nothing for granted, but I don't think the broader progressive community needs to worry about them too much beyond finishing out whatever grassroots programs that have already been put into place (which, since they all happen to be in swing Presidential states, should of course absolutely be finished out). I would also add the NC race to this list, with all the new black voters who will be coming out, I think it's very likely Kay Hagan will beat Dole.

Begich in Alaska is a lock to win if Stevens is convicted, but if he's acquitted, I fear a vindication/this was all politics factor that will be tough to overcome, so I rate this one as out of our hands.

The ones where I think progressive donors, groups, and online activists can really make a huge difference:

  • MN. Franken has been running just a little behind this whole race, but now has caught up. It would send shockwaves into both parties to have someone like Franken in the Senate, someone who has been as openly aggressive to O'Reilly, Limbaugh, and Coulter and others is so different than the culture of caution practiced by many in the Democratic party.

  • OR. Merkley has been helped a lot by the Democratic tide, and his strongly progressive campaign has Gordon Smith running scared. Great shot at a pickup.

  • ME. Susan Collins has a reputation as a moderate, but is famous for siding with right-wing Republicans when they need her (see my post on riding the train with Rick Santorum). Because of her reputation, though, it's been an uphill race for Tom Allen. With the tide coming in, she's now in trouble.

  • KY. As I've said in the past, I have deeply mixed feelings on this one, as Lunsford clearly isn't a progressive. But beating McConnell would be the sweetest thing imaginable, and this race is clearly in play. It should be a high priority.

I strongly recommend helping in these four races, but it's going to take some longshots coming in to give us a chance at 60 (if we won every single one of the above, we'd get there, but that's pretty unlikely, so I think we'll need at least one of these). Here's where those last couple of seats might come from:

  • GA. With the surprising rise of populist Jim Martin, who is remarkably close in the polling, and with lots of black voter registration and a likely huge black turnout, this out-of-the-blue race is the most likely of the longshots to be a victory. The big problem, naturally, is the huge Chambliss money edge. This is definitely a race where big donors and netroots givers alike could make a huge difference.

  • MS. Another race long thought to be a longshot, and another state where a huge black turnout could easily put Musgrove over the top. The polling has stayed consistently close, and Musgrove is also very competitive on money raised.

  • OK. Rice is an outstanding candidate who just keeps lurking around, lurking around, maybe a dozen points back. He doesn't have the benefit of a large African-American population, but an Obama tidal wave sweeping the country might still sweep him in.

  • NE. Another one which polls show is on the outer margin of possibility- two different late September polls had him fourteen points down, and we don't know whether the economic turmoil of the last two weeks could have moved numbers more his way. Like Rice, Kleeb is a very strong candidate, and with both Obama and the DCCC targeting the Omaha district for a lot of grassroots activity, Kleeb still has a shot.

Of those four, my favorite is GA- I think it's our best shot, and Martin seems like a pretty strong progressive.

So that's my top of the heap list. For each race, I've linked to a fundraising page so you can throw in a few dollars. There are a ton of exciting House races out there, as well as some big gubernatorial and closely divided state legislative chambers, so there are plenty of great races for everyone to be excited about. For me, though, given that we are pretty much a dead lock to pick up double digits in the House, getting to 60 Senate seats is the biggest deal remaining in this election outside of ensuring an Obama win.


Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Kentucky? (0.00 / 0)
I cannot believe you think activist progressive money should be targeted to Lunsford.  I'd love to get rid of Mitch, but Lunsford is no progressive.  Unless you are the $4,600 type, there are better places to contribute.  

My current targets are MN, OR, MS, and ALASKA.  Here, you have a lot more difference between the candidates and can feel good about the Democratic nominee.  I'd love to include Maine, and contributed to Allen and a top choice for a long time, but I just do not believe anymore.    


it's not about electing Lunsford (4.00 / 4)
It's about ditching McConnell. If he lost, it would be devastating for the GOP Senate caucus. They would face a divisive leadership battle and would probably not be as effective early in Obama's term.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.

[ Parent ]
Right on (4.00 / 1)
It would also be a heavy slap to the scorched earth obstructionism of Mr. Mitch.  Daschle played ball with W on several mportant matters  (like Iraq) and wqas still targeted by the GOPers.  This would be a huge shot across the bow for anybody trying to "lead" the charge against.  And make no mistake, it's the charge against everything except investing Social Security with the folks on Wall Stret.

[ Parent ]
GOP would filibuster less (0.00 / 0)
If McConnell were dumped.

[ Parent ]
The GOP will filibuster less (0.00 / 0)
If Harry Reid was dumped.

[ Parent ]
Let me add one (4.00 / 10)
I would add one more, which I actually think is the most important electoral competition in the country, after president: California's Prop 8. Given what Chris said below about the leftward turn in the country, this is really a chance to solidify gains on the most important civil rights issue of our time. And if we lose, it would be a huge setback for gay rights that may set us back many years.

(Meanwhile: you rate the NE and OK senate races above Texas?!)


Obviously, I agree! (0.00 / 0)
But you hit Post faster than me.

[ Parent ]
California Prop 8 (4.00 / 9)
I know this slightly departs from what you meant by this post, but I think defeating California Prop 8 is the single most important vote outside of electing Obama president.  If the gay marriage ban passes in California the religious right we be handed a huge victory putting us back a decade or so.  If the measure is defeated the perceived destruction of the conservative movement will seem complete.

Maybe you could also do some sort of (4.00 / 1)
"bang for your buck" calculation. $50 is going to do more in a race where budgets are in the hundreds of thousands rather than the millions -- but some races are also more important than others, and most states have some caveats and special circumstances to take into account.

Here's some I can think of:

GA-Sen: While Georgia is big and expensive, Martin is so underfunded that every penny counts.
(TX-Sen is also in this category -- is there a reason you didn't mention it? It's certainly not as much of a long shot as...)

OK-Sen, NE-Sen: While Oklahoma and Nebraska are inexpensive states, both Rice and Kleeb are way behind. (Rice's was my pick for sleeper race of the year earlier on, but the economic crisis doesn't seem to have helped him at all -- Oklahoma's economy is actually prospering, according to that map Matt linked earlier. So Rice is left being a Democrat in frickin' Oklahoma. Sad.)

KY-Sen: If you think of the Senate in terms of networks, beating McConnell would be absolutely huge, taking out the core. And Kentucky is a small state. But McConnell is one of the best fundraisers in the country (he has raised how many millions?), and Lunsford is reportedly immensely wealthy (though I haven't read anywhere how much he actually has -- anyone know?) and is self-funding, so I'm not sure small donations will go that far in this race.

The ideal race where you get the most bang for your buck would be something like Russ Feingold running against Mitch McConnell in a small state but badly underfunded, and the race deadlocked at a tie. The least cash-effective would be something like Ben Nelson running against Olympia Snowe in New Jersey, either ahead or behind by double digits, and with a mountain of cash on each side. Obviously, all the current races are somewhere between these extremes. If anyone is interested in trying to rank them, 'twould be interesting reading.

(Also, Mike, I agree with putting Darcy Burner at the very top of the list, even though she is "just" a House candidate. Besides being an excellent candidate, she is also the Netroots' own candidate. She wins and we win. She loses and we also lose.)


Burner has House Leader written all over her (0.00 / 0)
From her early response on critical issues like FISA and the bailout to her use of video, YouTube and the netroots community to amplify her message, she's been an important and clear voice on the issues that ultimately matter.  And I haven't even mentioned her work on the Responsible Plan.

This should be a big push.  We'll need leaders like her and Donna Edwards to act as a bulwark against the Emanuels and the Madia's in the House.  


[ Parent ]
How about WA-Gov? (4.00 / 3)
Incredibly close, and a huge difference between candidates.

Good post Mike (0.00 / 0)
Darcy is amazing. But Perriello and Feder are not getting major DCCC help so I would put them "above" Darcy for the small efforts I can contribute. And as much as I like Judy Feder she doesn't seem to be catching on in the district. I think Perriello has a much better shot at winning, that's my real priority race right now.

I think Feder is headed for a major role in Obama's Administration though, head of HHS maybe?  

John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power


GA is a better opportunity (4.00 / 1)
Jim Martin can win this thing. Based on current polling and early voting turnout, I'd certainly rate it above ME or KY in terms of competitiveness. Given that it's right on the edge at this point, it's arguably a better investment than even OR or MN. Heck, MS might be more competitive than ME or KY.

One sleeper I'd like to mention is NC-Gov. PPP just released a poll showing it to be very close, and it's a state where the Obama turnout machine could be a big factor.

Conduct your own interview of Sarah Palin!


Agree on Franken (0.00 / 0)
I would love to get Franken in the Senate 1) To shake the status quo up a little and 2) just to see OReilly and crew pop a blood vessel. First with Keith Ellison and now Franken, Minnesota is quickly becoming my hero.

Franken has been running just a little behind this whole race, but now has caught up. It would send shockwaves into both parties to have someone like Franken in the Senate, someone who has been as openly aggressive to O'Reilly, Limbaugh, and Coulter and others is so different than the culture of caution practiced by many in the Democratic party.
 

Just today (0.00 / 0)
Franken and Coleman's most recent fundraising numbers were announced today, and while Franken did better than Coleman in the last period, Coleman is still ahead by about 1.5 million in the Cash Onhand catagory.  So yea, some last minute cash probably would help.  

Obama's ground game is in good shape in the cities, and around here we do coordinate campaigns, so Franken will benefit from the overall organization.  The area I worry about is the 8th District, the Iron Range in the Northeast section of the state.  It is Hunting-Fishing and Snowmobile country, and Thursday and Friday this week Todd Palin, who apparently is something of a NASCAR Dad in Snowmobile culture, is touring the district and meeting with hunters and snowmobile folk.  That district badly needs a visit from someone who can counter this -- maybe Biden?  It is Jobs in the mining industry and outdoors culture.  The key to Minnesota is getting 70% on the Range, about the same in the Cities -- at least 55 in the first ring suburbs, and then keeping it close to 40% in the non-range rural areas.  And yea, in recent years the DFL has Flipped Rochester, the Mayo Clinic now goes DFL.  


Use It or Lose It (0.00 / 0)
We've got the small bucks, but what about a Use It or Lose It campaign by the netroots targeting Democrats in safe seats who are sitting on tens of millions of dollars? What's with Obama saying he won't contribute some of his cash to key congressional, especially Senate, campaigns? Isn't it time for the netroots to step up and to spearhead this campaign again, as was done in 2006?  

GA-Sen (0.00 / 0)
The DSCC just pushed in over 500K in Atlanta alone, and I would assume another chunk of cash probably isn't far behind for markets like Savannah and Macon. That should tell you something. I honestly believe Georgia is more winnable than Maine or Kentucky at this stage of the game. And, furthermore, a Martin victory would resuscitate the corpse that has been the Georgia Democratic Party since 2002. Rebuilding the party in Georgia around a good man like Martin is something we all need to get on board with.

Lunsford is a Multimillionaire Health Insurance Executive. (0.00 / 0)
   When Obama releases his health care plan, you can be sure that Lunsford will be an enormous wanker.  F%&* him.

John McCain lets lobbyists shape his economic policy

USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox