Wednesday Evening Election Round-up Thread

by: Chris Bowers

Wed Aug 22, 2007 at 19:26


Here is a four-pack for another fine, rainy evening:
  1. Hastert To Retire Early; Special Election for IL-14 Likely
    This is big news, and suddenly makes all of the attention the IL-14 Democratic primary has been receiving worth it:

    An Illinois Republican source tells us former Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) plans to resign November 6 this year instead of finishing out his term. This would create a vacancy and trigger a special election in the 14th District.

    Under Illinois statute, the governor, Rod Blagojevich (D), would get to pick the date of both of the special general election and the special primary election (with separate ballots for each party). The general election would have to be within 120 days of the vacancy (meaning by early March, if the November 6 resignation date holds). February 5 is the date for Illinois's presidential and congressional primaries, and slating the special election -- either the primaries or the general -- on that date would save state money.

    If the special election, or at least the primary for the special election, is held on February 5th, it will coincide with Super Tuesday. This would be dangerous for Democrats, because it means that campaign would be largely overshadowed by the Presidential contest online, thus removing an important element of national support. Then again, with Obama running for President, it should also mean very high Democratic turnout in the district. Overall, it is hard to say if this will be a net benefit or not. Prairie State Blue has more on the IL-14 campaign.

  2. Democrats Counter Republican Power Grab In California
    This is a great move by California Democrats:

    Democrats on Tuesday proposed putting on a 2008 ballot an initiative aimed at having California join the movement to elect presidents by popular vote. The initiative, if successful, also would head off a Republican effort to get some of California's electoral votes.

    GOP consultants have proposed a separate initiative to change California's winner-take-all system of awarding its 55 electoral votes. Under this measure, electoral votes would be awarded by how congressional districts vote, which could benefit the Republican nominee in this state with more registered Democrats.(…)

    A team of Democrats filed two virtually identical initiatives with the California attorney general's office Tuesday, a first step to begin gathering the hundreds of thousands of signatures needed to place either measure on the June or November ballot. (One version contains a clause stating that if both the Democratic- and Republican-backed initiatives make it onto the ballot, the one with the most votes would take precedence.)(…) The national drive toward a popular vote would not scrap the electoral college system, but would require states to award their electoral votes to whichever candidate wins the most actual votes nationally. It would take effect only if states representing a majority of the electoral votes agree to the change.

    Not only would this prevent Republicans from stealing 19-20 electoral votes outright, making it much more difficult for Democrats to win the presidency in 2008 and beyond, but this is a great step forward for the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, a plan which I have endorsed in the past even as North Carolina Dems successful took four, and possibly seven, electoral votes from Republicans.

  3. Clinton Way Ahead In New Gallup National Poll
    To no one's surprise, Clinton stays well ahead of Obama and Edwards in the latest Gallup national poll  468 Dems and Dem leaners, 8/13-16., MoE 5, 8/3-5 numbers in parenthesis:

    Clinton: 48 (48)
    Obama: 25 (26)
    Edwards: 12 (13)
    No on else above 2%

    Of course, remember that Iowa and New Hampshire have typically cancelled out nation polls.

  4. Time For Teacher Accountability
    Given my background as a teacher and union organizer, I find concepts like merit pay for teacher's an appalling means of destroying teacher recruitment, especially in inner cities, not to mention punishing many people who work in one of the most difficult professions nationwide. However, there is one circumstance where I wouldn't mind a little merit pay for teachers. Bush Dog Melissa Bean is apparently the new role model for Democratic candidates:

    Bean, a self-styled pro-business Democrat from a slice of Chicago's north and northwest suburbs long dominated by the GOP, has become an archetype for many of the congressional rookies whose victories delivered control of the House to Democrats last fall -- and whose fortunes in 2008 will determine whether the new majority lasts another two years.(…)

    "She's a real role model for someone like myself, running in a Republican-leaning district," said Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), a freshman who holds a top spot on the National Republican Congressional Committee's target list for 2008.(…)

    Other Democrats followed suit across the country, winning seats long held by Republicans in areas where Bush cruised in his presidential victories. Bean mentored some of them, including Giffords, during the campaign.

    'If she can do it, I can too'

    "There's no question," Bean said in a recent interview, "that some of the candidates who ran in the last cycle said, 'If she can do it, I can too.'"

    Holding up Giffords as a model isn't exactly compelling since, the NRCC abandoned the district to her on September 13, 2006. Would some of the other candidates Bean consulted include Diane Farrell, Lois Murphy, Linda Stender, Patricia Madrid, Mary Jo Kilroy, Victoria Wulsin, Christine Jennings, Teresa Hafen, and many of the other droves of Democratic women who lost close House elections in 2006? I mean, is there a way to take this as something other than an admission that Melissa Bean's instructions are at least partially responsible for the horrid performance of Democratic women in US House elections in 2006? It would certainly make a lot of sense, since moving to the right was not exactly the same winning strategy in 2006 that it might have been in 2004.

This is an open thread on elections.

Chris Bowers :: Wednesday Evening Election Round-up Thread

Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Hastert (0.00 / 0)
The filing date for the 2008 primaries is November 5, 2007 in Illinois IIRC.  Hasterrt is vacating the seat a day after for a special election?  Certainly not a coincidence.

In NJ last year, NJ-13 had a vacancy created by Bob Memendez being handed an interim Senate seat.  The special election had fewer candidates than the regular general election.  Of course the newly incumbent congressman cruised to victory in the fall(Albio Sires).  Possibly Hastert is trying to gift wrap his seat as a going away present.


California (0.00 / 0)
A lot of us are very, very worried about the California initiative battle.  Ans speaking as someone who has long supported the National Popular Vote plan, I am quite certain that the intentions of the Democrats who placed it on the ballot were not good.  They are using a very commonplace "confuse and kill" strategy to get both initiatives to lose.  The upshot is that it may NOT be good for the NPV movement to have this on the ballot at this time.  If it does its job, great, but I'm not sure it's a step forward.

Incidentally, the Democrats running the opposition campaign to the right-wing power-grab are the same guys who ran Gray Davis' fight in the California recall.

Insert shameless blog promotion here.


But The Netroots Are Gaining Strength (0.00 / 0)
The upside of this is that it can serve as a real stimulus to organizing progressive Dems online to counter the brain-dead California consulting class.  This is not an opportunity we should pass by, IMHO.

"Senate passes expanded GI bill despite Bush, McCain opposition"

[ Parent ]
Two key questions and an idea (0.00 / 0)
There are two legal questions that need to be addressed, and the sooner the better:

(1)  Is a vote by the people of any state on allocating electoral votes constitutional?  Article II, Section 1, second paragraph, first sentence of the U. S. Constitution says:

Each state shall appoint in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct ...

My emphasis on legislature.

(2) Is the other measure, the national popular vote, a de facto compact among states, and therefore a violation of Article I, Section 10, last paragraph:

No state shall, without the consent of Congress, ... enter into any agreement of compact with another state ...

Idea:  the best defense against this power grab by the GOPigs is for a member of the California state legislature to introduce a bill to require that all of California's electoral college votes go to the statewide winner of the general election (as is done now).  If the courts find that the people do have the right to direct how a state's electoral votes are allocated and if the national popular vote measure is ruled a compact and therefore unconstitutional, then the legislative measure can be placed on the ballot in the November 2008 general election to undo whatever damage may occur in the meantime.

The contingency November 2008 initiative generated by the legislature should have four elements:

(1)  The State of California will cast all electoral votes for President for the candidate that wins the state (same as current method). 

(2)  The initiative takes effect immediately (so that it will be in effect when the Electoral College meets in December to officially cast its 55 votes. 

(3)  National Popular Vote:  The State of California will cast its 55 votes for the national popular vote winner as soon as enough states to comprise a majority of the electoral votes needed to elect a President (currently 270) do likewise.  Escape clause:  if another state reneges on its agreement, then California is not bound by the National Popular Vote.

(4)  A severability clause that says if the National Popular vote (element 3) is unconstitutional, then the state will maintain casting all its 55 votes for the statewide winner.

But the time to mount a court challenge as to whether or not the people have the right usurp the authority of the state legislature is now, not later. 


[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search