Canvassing and Tagging Along: Why Trust in Politicians Matters

by: Matt Stoller

Sat Oct 25, 2008 at 17:47


Over the past few days, the major event in the ccampaign has been Seattle Times reporter Emily Heffter's hit piece on Darcy about her degree (for more on Heffter's approach to journalism, read this comment).  Reichert is up on TV with this ad, and with the illegal contribution from Media Plus, he has substantial rotation on TV behind the allegation.  Burner's response from former Harvard Dean Harry Lewis is also up.

I had hoped to talk to voters and find out how the attack was resonating,so I went out canvassing today.  Unfortunately, nearly every knock on a door elicited no response.  The weather's beautiful so people aren't home, and when someone's not home, you leave some lit squeezed in between their door knob and hope they take a glance at it and remember to vote.  This is especially true with transient rental communities, where low probability voters reside.  It's not clear how the race is shaping up now, with Darcy narrowly ahead in the polls but this last minute smear up on TV.

In the slideshow above, you'll see pictures from a variety of events, including a local school festival celebrating cultures from around the world (represented by their student body, whose parents immigrated from all over the world), a variety of senior centers, and a sustainability fair at a local community college.  

Matt Stoller :: Canvassing and Tagging Along: Why Trust in Politicians Matters
The most revealing conversation was with a retired machinist, an immigrant from Taiwan hanging out at one of the senior centers we visited.  His property taxes, he complains, have doubled since 2004, and he's incredibly angry at Governor Gregoire.  He's not upset that his taxes have gone up, mind you, just that the tax rate has stayed the same even as the assessment value has increased.  Property values are falling, but his property is assessed at a higher and higher value, and he's unable to dispute the state on that matter.  He feels cheated, and so he doesn't like politicians.

I've seen this attitude in New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, and now Washington state.  People don't like property taxes because they seem arbitrary and unfair, but they aren't willing to shift to an income tax basis even when they want a different tax system because they don't believe the politicians who keep raising their property taxes will implement a new tax properly.  At heart, this is a problem with trust in government, and not that government is using money inefficiently.  No one is clearly explaining the situation in a trustworthy and clear manner and discussing the trade-offs involved.

As property values deflate all over the country, getting the Federal government to help move the states away from property taxes should be a key goal, or states and municipalities will simply be unable to govern.  


Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
You've surely seen this... (0.00 / 0)
... the new Reichert site to capitalize on their attack: http://www.harvardhoax.com/

Meanwhile, the Seattle Times no longer prints more than one or two letters in their daily paper, but instead put them online only.  In the latest batch of letters is the following good letter that perhaps has one of the best explanations of this whole issue I have read:

http://blog.seattletimes.nwsou...

As recent Harvard graduates, we have a shocking revelation we would like to share with your readers: Democratic congressional candidate Darcy Burner may have received a degree from Harvard in 1996, but she was neither a computer-science major nor an economics minor, and she was certainly not both ["Darcy Burner's claims of a Harvard econ degree an exaggeration," News, Oct. 22].

The terminology our university uses can be tricky. Graduates of Harvard College (which is part of Harvard University, but actually predates it), receive artium baccalaureus (A.B.) degrees, also known as Bachelor of Arts in English, and instead of majors, we have concentrations. We call teaching assistants "teaching fellows." And despite last year's addition of secondary fields, there was and is still nothing called a minor at Harvard.

As her profile on The Seattle Times' Web site correctly states, Burner's education is, "Harvard University, B.A. in computer science with a special field of economics, 1996." And as she explains on her own Web site, at Harvard, Burner "earned a degree in computer science and economics." There is no contradiction here, no exaggeration, and certainly no lying.

At Harvard, we have joint concentrations, which are like double majors. As of this year, we also have primary and secondary fields, which is like a major and a minor. And to make matters even more confusing, when Burner was at Harvard, the computer-science department required students to choose an area of specialization. Burner chose economics. As a result, Burner completed five upper-level economics courses, in addition to significant course work in computer science and mathematics. Burner's course of study was almost certainly more intensive than that of the majority of economics concentrators at Harvard.

Voters in Washington's 8th Congressional District have more important issues to worry about than the terms in use at Harvard. We hope that The Seattle Times recommits itself to investigating issues that really matter as the election draws near.

-- Jean Yang, Cambridge, Mass., and Seth Flaxman, Switzerland

I wonder if Emily Heffter will read this letter and try to make right her wrong which has led to all this?



On The Road To 2008: Commentary on issues as we countdown to the next opportunity to change the direction of America


Better answers on degree questions (0.00 / 0)
Help!  I'm canvassing in my rural precinct of WA-08 a couple of days a week.  Twenty acre to 1/2 acre lots and lots of farm animals in southeast King County.

The "education lie" came up Saturday and I was relieved to be somewhat prepared for it. I had copies of the press release with me and had seen the video on the website.  I'd like to explain it better without using the word tricky or technical

I'm canvassing out of the Auburn office today and hopefully there will be a script for the "education lie".  Otherwise, I really would like a nice short simple answer.  There are a lot of teachers in this neighborhood and this doesn't sit well.

People were home doing chores Saturday in the nice weather as this is do-it-yourself territory.  It's tough walking out here, no sidewalks or even a shoulder on some busy streets, long driveways and lots of loose dog. I follow-up and go back when I need to but I prefer to finish up in one stop.


Simplest answer... (0.00 / 0)
...would be to explain that given how differently Harvard names things, Darcy would simply using references that are more common to people by saying she has a degree in computer science and economics.  In no way was she trying to deceive anyone since the record is clear that the economics part was a special field study and thesis.  Had she known it would only seem more confusing she surely wouldn't have done so - there was no intention to deceive voters.

On The Road To 2008: Commentary on issues as we countdown to the next opportunity to change the direction of America

[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox