The Teamsters Do NOT Support War With Iran

by: TeamsterPower

Thu Aug 23, 2007 at 17:15


(This is a response to my post on the Teamster's divestiture of their pension funds from companies that do business with Iran. Matt - promoted by Chris Bowers)

The Teamsters do not support attacking Iran. We are not the puppets of Fox News. And we are not a tool of some covert Neo-con conspiracy to take over the world.

What we do stand for is labor rights. We consistently speak out about labor rights violations in Iran, Latin America, Asia and anywhere people are punished, imprisoned and killed for their basic human right to freely associate and form unions.

We are National Guard and Reserve members, parents of active duty service people and veterans who served this country in times of peace and conflict.

To suggest that our effort to put economic pressure on Iran, a country that has repeatedly imprisoned labor organizers, is part of a "PR ploy for military action against Iran" is ludicrous, especially coming from our friends in the progressive community.

TeamsterPower :: The Teamsters Do NOT Support War With Iran
We have worked long and hard to build bridges with the Netroots community and will continue to do so. We have reached out to Matt Stoller and other bloggers offering support and opening doors to union officials, including General President Jim Hoffa.

The Netroots community is helping us organize workers and expose the deplorable conditions that workers right here in the U.S. must endure in order to form unions. We, in turn, work to educate our members and others about Progressive issues and candidates. We are on the same side of many issues.

To say that "Now Jimmy Hoffa and the Teamsters are in on an expansion of an unethical war to new countries," is insulting and without basis.

Yes, this is the first time Hoffa has called for a divestiture of our pension funds from companies that do business in a country, mainly because it is a very complex and difficult thing to do. However, the Teamsters have taken actions against multinational companies that do business in other repressive regimes, including Burma and Guatemala.

Why did Hoffa choose to take this action?

Government authorities in Tehran abducted Mansour Osanloo, president of the Syndicate of Workers of Tehran and Suburbs (Vahed) Bus Company, on July 10. He was severely beaten. For more than a month he's been imprisoned in the notorious Evin prison. Mahmoud Salehi, founder of the Saghez Bakery Workers Association, was condemned to a year in prison for his courage in mobilizing workers.  He is incarcerated in Kurdistan, far from his family and in danger of dying.
 

And getting Tehran to respect the right to form unions is something the Teamsters have been working on for more than a year.

Saying we support war is a huge jump from pulling our retirement money out of a country that members of both political parties agree is engaged in activities that threaten the security of troops overseas, neighboring countries and national security.

In fact, "Just last month, the U.S. House of Representatives (led by Democrats) overwhelmingly passed a bill that protects private and public funds that divest shares in companies that invest more than $20 million in Iran's energy sector."

Like most Americans, the Teamsters support our troops in the field and wish they could return to the safety of their homes and jobs. It is our members who are losing their sons and daughters in this war. And anything we can do to prevent that loss, we will do.

Hoffa said he liked the Netroots because you are "tough on everybody," and we certainly do not shrink from your criticisms. However, creating motives out of thin air is unfair and unjustified.


Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Perhaps the Teamsters' motives are innocent, but . . . (4.00 / 3)
. . . if so, they are guilty of startling naivety if they didn't understand that the timing and political context of this decision would make it look like they were collaborating with the PR campaign for war on Iran.

If they want to clear things up, I applaud them, but how did you guys think this was going to look?


Ok then (4.00 / 1)
And speaking as a former IBT member (for 11 years). Like the former commenter, though, maybe Iran is not the most timely target.

PS: Love the "TeamsterPower" handle. When I was involved in an organizing drive as a rank-and-filer, the bosses made a big deal out what mean nasty mofos the Teamsters were. Funny thing, the guys (and gals), far from being turned away, thought, "Great, these are the guys who will hammer the bums we work for".


agree (0.00 / 0)
with the other comments

On twitter: @BobBrigham

strong defense and all but he did say this (0.00 / 0)

"Further, Iran supplies weapons and training to Shia militant groups that attack our troops in Iraq, according to the U.S. State Department...
What I am concerned about, though, is that Teamsters' hard-earned money would support in any way an enemy of the United States of America.  No Teamster should ever have to worry that his or her retirement money is used to support terrorism in any way."

Which kinda um implies how Iran is due for a spanking.


No it doesn't (4.00 / 1)
It is a criticism of Iran's alleged activities.  If we believe that Iran is engaging in such activities, i.e. giving aid to militants attacking U.S. troops, then an important policy discussion is how to respond.  The neocons say war.  What do the Dems say?  Surely the idea of divesting one's pension funds from the country is a small step -- perhaps part of a more constructive solution.

The prior question is whether the idea that Iran is aiding militants has some basis or is just hype.

Cutting to the chase, I think it's clear that the Teamsters were doffing their hat to the war on terror and appealling to a sense of patriotism in their members.  Hoffa probably should have limited his comments to Iran's treatment of labor leaders.  But in this light his comments reflect a basic lack of consensus/vision on behalf of democrats about how to engage Iran -- talk with its leaders?  keep every option on the table?  don't make any direct comments lest you signal future U.S. policy?


[ Parent ]
Divestment is one of the best tools we have ... (4.00 / 1)
but not using it in so many world situations where workers are jailed, killed, abused and exploited - and then deciding to use it this one time and including a repetition of the administration's propaganda about Iran sure looks like something other than simple concern for Iranian workers.

It would be very interesting to look at the investments of the Teamsters to see whether the union supports workers globally through all its investment decisions and not just when there's a push for war against Iran.

I am also a former Teamster.


my words were poorly chosen (0.00 / 0)
I don't think Iran deserves a spanking but was trying to highlight Hoffa's words which sounded warlike.  Your post was excellant, I poorly communicated my point.

Where's Matt? (0.00 / 0)
Too bad he doesn't have the courtesy to respond to TeamsterPower's entry.

USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox