More On My Obama Projection

by: Chris Bowers

Fri Oct 31, 2008 at 12:45


I'm missing the Phillies parade for this, but I have to keep writing about it. I'm sticking by my Obama projection.

Explanation in the extended entry.

Chris Bowers :: More On My Obama Projection
First, McCain has conceded 203 electoral votes to Obama. That is, in states where both Kerry and Gore won, McCain isn't running any ads in states worth 203 electoral votes. He is ran about 24K of ads in Maine last week, but the RNC pulled out and Pollser.com shows Obama ahead by 16.9% in the state. So, I'll mark Maine down in the Obama column, too, giving him 207. Here is a look at four other states that puts Obama up to 238:

IA, MN, NH, and WI Polls 10/24-10/30
State EV's Obama % McCain % Margin Polls Obama EVs
Obama Lock 207 207
Iowa 7 54.0% 39.5% +14.5% 2 214
Minnesota 7 54.0% 40.3% +13.7% 4 224
Wisconsin 10 52.7% 40.7% +12.0% 3 234
New Hampshire 4 52.3% 41.0% +11.3% 4 238

Blowout city in these four states. From this point, only Colorado, New Mexico and Pennsylvania are needed for victory.

Looking at Colorado and New Mexico, more than half of the vote has already been cast. In Colorado, as I noted last night, Obama leads early voters by 15% in Rasmussen, 18% in Marist and 17% in PPP. The tight grouping of these numbers gives them a lot of credibility, and means that McCain must win the remaining voters by a minimum of 18.4% (but probably by way more). The polling situation is much worse for McCain in New Mexico, and roughly the same percentage of early votes have been cast. There really just isn't anyway for McCain to win either Colorado or New Mexico right now. Nate Silver didn't quite come out and say as much this morning, but he came pretty close.

That puts Obama at 252 electoral votes, with only Pennsylvania's 21 electoral needed for victory. If it wasn't clear before, the logic of McCain's Pennsylvania strategy should be clear now. McCain has to win Pennsylvania in order to win the election. Period. He has no other path right now. So, effectively, when I am calling the election for Obama, I am really just calling Pennsylvania for Obama. It's the same thing. Pennsylvania is the win state.

In the five Pennsylvania polls taken entirely since October 26th, Obama leads by an average of 50.4%--43.6%. Holding onto that lead is all Obama has to do in order to win the election. While that is a bit closer than it has been recently, it includes a Republican polling firm ("Strategic" "Vision") that always skews toward Republicans, and Obama is over 50%. McCain hasn't led in a telephone poll here since April 24th, and hasn't passed 47% in a telephone poll here since the same time period. And, as a member of the Pennsylvania state Democratic committee, I am indeed willing to guarantee an Obama victory in Pennsylvania.

Now, if this de-motivates you, then we come from different places. This analysis psyches me up huge. I want to go canvass my neighborhood right now, but it is Halloween and everyone in the city is downtown cheering for the Phillies right now. Tomorrow, I'm hitting the pavement, and not stopping until everyone in my division (precinct) has been canvassed. I want to kick their butt even harder. I want to be the win state.

If this makes you superstitious, then we really come from different places. Not only am I a very analytical, non-spiritual person, but the city where I live just broke a twenty-five year curse (The Curse of Willie Penn). So, out here in Philly, I am feeling pretty superstition proof right now.

One thing is for certain, I want to win by a lot more than 273-265. We need a large electoral victory, 51.0%+ of the popular vote, and huge majorities in Congress. We need everything that gives Democrats a mandate, and the numbers to enforce that mandate in D.C. We are going to get the win, but of course that is no reason to stop working. Let's pile it on. Let's get out there and kick some more ass, but do it with a confidence in victory, and a strut that Democrats have lacked for so long.


Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
strategic vision (0.00 / 0)
I'm not sure if Strategic Vision has much of a Republican lean. It has Obama +9 in NH, and +13 in Michigan...I think Pennsylvania is narrowing. So far, Obama does not have any more campaign stops scheduled there.

Yes, SV leans Republican (4.00 / 2)
"Strategic Vision has a pretty recognizable Republican-leaning house effect. Mason-Dixon too, which we mentioned."--Nate Silver

You have to be blind as a poll watcher to not see Strategic Vision consistently leaning toward Republicans.

And Obama was just here three days ago.  


[ Parent ]
Moving on to the mandate question (4.00 / 1)
I agree with your analysis and assume it's all over. Having said that, what can we realistically hope for in terms of a mandate?

In other words, what combination of states - aside from all 50 - provide the most ammunition for claiming a genuine mandate (and then turning that into action)?  Is there some magical electoral vote threshold? Is this a matter of jacking up the margin in the popular vote? Does geographical diversity matter?


The mandate question is (0.00 / 0)
the Obama campaign's first post-election test. And ours. We and they need to insist upon a mandate, to claim the mandate and prove the mandate. That's the first real post-electoral measure of our commitment, competence, and infrastructure.

50%+1 is sufficient for a mandate ... if you wield the power to define a mandate as 50%+1.


[ Parent ]
Right on Chris! (0.00 / 0)
As always your analysis is rock solid. Now go out and have fun - you will need your intellectual energy next week bud.

ooohhh (0.00 / 0)
A WHOLE 25 years  without a baseball title...

it isn't just baseball (4.00 / 1)
It's any title at all. No four sports town has ever gone remotely this long without one.

[ Parent ]
I know how you feel (4.00 / 1)
Us New Yorkers haven't had a championship since February. It's been a long nine months.  

[ Parent ]
yeah, really ... (4.00 / 1)
... no Yankees or Mets title in almost a decade now.  I feel for you.

[ Parent ]
If you are a Houston Astros fan (4.00 / 3)
Then I don't want to hear any narcissistic whining about "it's been 25 years!".

Really?  Really??

From the early years of the Colt 45's, (not that I was around then), but yes, my WHOLE FRICKIN' LIFE, I've been waiting waiting for a World Series win from the Astros.

I grew to love the Astros during their San Francisco color years - go Rainbow suits!!

Ah - 2005 - at least we GOT there - even though we were swept.  And it was a good story, losing to the White Sox.

So, don't whine to ME about your "25 years", buddy...

:)


As I said before (0.00 / 0)
It isn't just baseball. It's all four sports. The city hasn't won anything since 1983, the longest streak for a four sports town in history, I believe.

[ Parent ]
As a Rangers fan...you too are a narcissistic whiner! (4.00 / 2)
Not only have we never even seen the promise land of a WS visit, we also had George W. as a part owner.  I mean talk about your infamy of infamies.  While I don't think he really had any decision making power over the team (which really prepared him for being Governor of Texas and VP to Cheney), his 'midas' touch of disaster haunts me from the diamond to our dear crumbling country.  

[ Parent ]
Alright .. (4.00 / 2)
Cesar Cedeno ... Jose Cruz .. J.R. Richard .. Nolan Ryan .. Ken Forsch .. Craig Reynolds .. Terry Puhl ... Denny Walling .. Dave Smith .. Joe Sambito .. Bill Virdon(who was an underrated manager) ... ;-)  ...  I lived in Houston too then(but live not too far from Bowers now .. go figure) .. I remember the Astros losing to the Phillies in '80 .. and I also remember how the Oilers got robbed by the referees .. when Renfro got two feet down in the back of the end zone vs. the Steelers .. in the AFC championship game ... and they ruled him out of bounds .. if only for instant replay!!

[ Parent ]
My baseball soul brother!! (4.00 / 1)
Love those names, yep yep yep!

Don't get me started on the Oilers though...eh...we wuz robbed, a couple of times there.

And then of course, Bud Adam took the team OUT - and since I moved - to the other coast - I simply couldn't get excited with the location, and the name changed, to the Titans.  

I've never felt the impulse to "pick up" a new team - I'd have to "decide" to do it, rather than it being natural.  Just haven't done it.


[ Parent ]
Long time Astros fan here (4.00 / 2)
from the days of Puhl, Cedeno, Cruz, Niekro, J.R. Richard, et al.

Yes, no sympathy from this corner, especially considering what MLB/Selig did to them this very year with H. Gustav.

4 teams/ per city or not, I don't give a damn.


[ Parent ]
What is up with comment view? (0.00 / 0)
Looks horrible - at least for me - gray and centered in the middle - both IE and Firefox.

Looking into it (0.00 / 0)
Not sure what the problem is.

[ Parent ]
Much better - Thanks (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Larry Sebato's last Word (0.00 / 0)
http://www.centerforpolitics.o...

Obama 364 EV  McCain 174 EV

Dems will gain 7-8 Senate seats & 26-35 House Seats


Chris (0.00 / 0)
I don't disagree with your analysis. I've thought this for a while but refuse to say it out loud without knocking on wood.

Superstitious? Yes. But we don't get anything out of tempting the fates- at most this sort of talk depresses turnout (though admittedly probably not with this audience).

I'm going relax, confident in my optimism. But I'm not counting chickens.


And now to get back to work (0.00 / 0)
Now that Obama has won, it's time to keep working.  Tomorrow I canvass for Jim Hines to defeat the last R in New England.

Course... you're in Pennsylvania (0.00 / 0)
and have defined your own state as the win state.  Of course you're motivated!

I'm more motivated by this: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

I'm looking for a total and utter rejection of appeals to bigotry.

QT

Visit the Obama Project


WindOnWater.net




Re Canvassing (0.00 / 0)
Dude: Have you been canvassing lately?  If not you'll be amazed by what the Obama Campaign hands you.  The lists have been combed and refined over and over.  

Last week I canvassed seven days in Henderson, NV.  I canvassed one neighborhood on Sunday, October 19 and then re-canvassed it again on Thursday, October 23.  In the meantime, all of the information I had gleaned in the earlier canvass had been incorporated into the new lists of names I was handed for the neighborhood.  People who had already voted had been eliminated, people who were strongly supporting McCain had been eliminated. People who had moved had been eliminated.

By this point, more than a week later, things are going to be very very targeted.  You will be working on putting together lists of people who will need rides to the polls and, perhaps, still knocking on some doors that have been "NH" in all past visits.

I have NEVER seen a canvass this obsessive, organized, focused or so robustly staffed.  This is a difference in kind, not just in quantity, from other canvasses I've worked on.

If you've ever known a crankster, you'd recognize some of those personality traits in the Obama campaign.  These people have been staying up for days.  They are to canvassing Democratic voters what a Frisbee dog is to catching and returning a Frisbee.  They are the Border Collies of grassroots politics.


That was one of the best comments I've ever read. (0.00 / 0)

Maybe you should write up a diary with your canvassing experiences, comments, and predictions?

Although, if you're too busy canvassing, I totally understand ;).


[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox