Transparency? Baucus Says, "We Don't Need No Stinkin' Transparency."

by: David Sirota

Tue Nov 11, 2008 at 03:14


I noticed this nasty little excerpt from the Washington Post's expose on the Bush administration's $140 billion taxpayer rip-off:

In an off-the-record conference call on Oct. 7, nearly a dozen Capitol Hill staffers demanded answers from Solomon for about an hour. Several of the participants left the call even more convinced that the administration had overstepped its authority, according to people familiar with the conversation. But lawmakers worried about discussing their concerns publicly. The staff of Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.), chairman of the Finance Committee, had asked that the entire conference call be kept secret, according to a person with knowledge of the call.

Is that the kind of transparency we can expect from Democrats in the new Congress? If so, everyone start dusting off your FOIA papers.

David Sirota :: Transparency? Baucus Says, "We Don't Need No Stinkin' Transparency."

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
P. Rosenberg aptly calls it Versailles (0.00 / 0)
and like Versailles it will not change voluntarily.

All Obama does is buy you time to grow liberalism. That means intellectual work and teaching of people.

If you were honest, you would admit that a lot of the sacred cows of the current intellectual climate are of little use in the coming era.

E.g. blue collar work in the age of robots.


well said (0.00 / 0)


Michael Bloomberg, prince of corporate welfare

[ Parent ]
blue collar work is a sacred cow? (0.00 / 0)
In what stratum of the current intellectual climate is blue collar work a sacred cow?

Unless you have an economic system in mind that decouples a person's work from their ability to have food, shelter, clothing, and healthcare provided, I would be worried about things like "the age of robots" being the path of making more and more humans economically useless. Just how many "knowledge workers" can a society support?


[ Parent ]
Sirota blows it (0.00 / 0)
Sirota, you were on Rahcel Maddow last night and blew a golden opportunity.  You have been harping for days now about the meme of this country still being a center right country, and you were handed an opportunity to dispel this myth, and what did you do   NOTHING.  Nice job. Next time practice what you preach.

Munodi blows it (0.00 / 0)
David pushed a different one of his common themes on the RMS - the Innocent Bystander Myth.  What purpose would be served by answering a different question than the one he was there for- especially when that question is also really important? What's been preached but not practiced?

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.

[ Parent ]
What purpose? (0.00 / 0)
If you have to ask what purpose it would serve then alas for you their is no hope!

[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox