Wash Post Re-Floats Possibility of Lame-Duck NAFTA Expansion

by: David Sirota

Thu Nov 20, 2008 at 14:00


Glenn Greenwald long ago taught us why we should always look skeptically at the fact-free prognostications of the Washington Post's Steve Pearlstein. That said, this line in Pearlstein's column today caught my eye today (h/t lutton):

"The haggling now [about the automaker bailout] is over the appropriate mechanism. My guess is that the whole thing will be wrapped up shortly after Thanksgiving, perhaps in a holiday package that will include congressional approval (but delayed implementation) of the free-trade agreement with Colombia." (emphasis added)

My last newspaper column explored how the Colombia Free Trade Agreement is about nothing other than serving corporate interests; how poll after poll after poll has shown Americans intensely oppose such NAFTA expansions; how in 2006 and 2008, a total of 69 new congressional lawmakers - mostly Democrats - won on an explicit promise to stop NAFTA expansions; and how therefore, the Republican push for this trade deal is a political ploy designed to fracture Democrats much like NAFTA fractured them in 1993.

David Sirota :: Wash Post Re-Floats Possibility of Lame-Duck NAFTA Expansion
Pearlstein admits that his prediction is a "guess" - which, in journalism speak, usually means it is the reporter's wish, but the reporter knows most of the facts align against that wish. That's probably especially true in this instance, considering even NAFTA proponent Rahm Emanuel has said Democrats are not going to support tying any economic stimulus or automaker bailout package to the Colombia Free Trade Agreement. Emanuel may support corporate-written trade policies - but he's a political operator first and foremost, and likely understands what I was getting at in my column.

That said, the fact that the Washington Post's top business columnist feels the need to longingly push out this possibility shows us that the fight to reform our trade policy is far from over. The corporate media Establishment has long been one of the most powerful forces pushing mindless free-trade fundamentalism - and that Establishment is not about to let up.


Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
non-sense of congress (0.00 / 0)
this congress wants to write checks to the big auto companies and grand stand on CSPAN about factories moving overseas; but has voted time and again for nafta and nafta like trade terms (and Obama plans to back burner revising them). why aren't new trade terms in the auto bill floated by levin? oh, cause we can't actually talk about congress' (and soon to be Obama's) complicity in this - much easier to just burn tax payer dollars in a giant political rouse.  

~* the * Will * to go on *~

thanks for your excellent work on the colombia fta (4.00 / 1)
My organization, the Latin America Working Group, works on trade issues in so far as they relate to human rights, and we've opposed the U.S.-Colombia FTA from the start on human rights grounds. We just released A Compass for Colombia Policy, which you can find at www.lawg.org. Anyways, I'd be interested in talking with you to explore how we can collaborate with you and others interested in keeping this issue "on the radar" during the Obama Administration. Thanks again for your great work.

Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search