The House Is Alright

by: Chris Bowers

Thu Nov 20, 2008 at 16:45


First, we discovered that more Better Democrats won seats in the U.S. House than did Blue Dogs. Next, we learned that Rahm Emanuel's departure from the House resulted in more progressive legislators taking over caucus leadership positions. Then, earlier today, Henry Waxman defeated John Dingell for the chairmanship of the Energy and Commerce committee. Now, TPM Election Central points out that a long-time Waxman staffer has been appointed as the top White House liason to Congress:

Congressional insiders point out that Barack Obama, in a little-noticed move a few days ago, appointed as the top White House liason to Congress one Philip Schiliro, who has spent many of his past 25 years on the Hill working for (you guessed it) Waxman.

In the wake of Waxman's victory, this is significant. It means Waxman will be closer to the center of the action and will have a direct line into the White House. Congressional insiders also point out that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is an ally of Waxman -- and hence, of Obama's liason to Congress.

How significant is all of this? It puts progressives firmly in control of the House leadership, and right at the center of Obama's top priorities. Harold Meyerson:

Fundamentally, there are two reasons Waxman would be the better chairman of Energy and Commerce. First, he is probably the House's most accomplished legislator in three issue areas that are high on the agendas of the nation and President-elect Barack Obama: universal health care, global warming and enhanced consumer protections (no small matter with a steadily rising percentage of our food and medication ingredients coming from China). On environmental questions, Waxman offers a sharp contrast to Dingell, who has long been the primary opponent of stricter standards for auto emissions and fuel efficiency.

Meyerson then provides a long list of Waxman's legislative accomplishments in the pre-1994 U.S. House, and they are indeed impressive. He is not just progressive, he is also highly effective.

The House is alright. We done good in that branch of Congress. It looks very likely that progressives will have a major voice at the table for all of Obama's legislative priorities.

Now, if we can just get good picks for Defense, State and Treasury, we will be doing alright when it comes to Obama's administrative priorities.

Chris Bowers :: The House Is Alright

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Any word on EPA head? (0.00 / 0)


How about kicking some ass in the Senate? (0.00 / 0)
Now, if we can just get good picks for Defense, State and Treasury, we will be doing alright when it comes to Obama's administrative priorities.

That body still needs work.


Yeah, it's a problem (0.00 / 0)
However, all spending bills have to start in the House, so in some areas it actually has more power than the Senate. Judicial appointments are an obvious case in the other direction, where the Senate has more power than the House.

[ Parent ]
Did Obama pull strings for Waxman? (0.00 / 0)
It would be nice to know that Obama isn't totally ignoring progressives.

John McCain won't insure children

Didn't hear about any Obama involvement either way (0.00 / 0)
However, appointing a long-time Waxman staffer as top liason is a possible sign that he helped out.

[ Parent ]
I don't see how this happens otherwise (4.00 / 2)
I really like what I've seen in the past week.  The Lieberman vote, which was more symbolic, goes centrist.  The policy vote on Energy and Commerce goes progressive.  This is the most viable way that Obama and his congressional leadership can govern - go bipartisan on high publicity, low impact issues and go progressive on shit that really matters.  Also really enjoyed how Waxman's people were silent in the media during the runup to the vote, while Dingell's supporters were running their mouths.  That's how you take care of business.  

[ Parent ]
magster, I'm responding to your Waxman posts again! (0.00 / 0)
We now know that 2 of Waxman's former staff are working in the Obama administration. That's got to send some sort of message to Congress.

[ Parent ]
Well (4.00 / 1)
I don't think Obama personally did but Waxman's former staffers are basically running his congressional outreach so I wouldn't be suprised if a few subtle messages were being sent.  

John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power

[ Parent ]
i think those in the bush (0.00 / 0)
admin that might think they have something to hide should lawyer up the sooner the better, just in case, maybe gitmo would be a good place for these criminals to spend some time, just to see how the other side lives, i can't wait, pay back is especially sweet in this case america.

I actually think that Bush and cronies might be safe (0.00 / 0)
Waxman was chair of Oversight and Government Reform. I assume he'll have to give that up.

And next in line is Ed Towns, the almost Blue Dog from Brooklyn. I doubt either he or Lieberman would undertake a proper investigation.


[ Parent ]
Offense vs. defense (4.00 / 1)
Waxman at Oversight and Government Reform made sense with a Republican administration. The Democratic representation (with control of the House only) was in a defensive position and needed to conduct hit-and-run investigations to slow down administration policy drives. Now, with Obama in charge, we want the energy Waxman brought to that committee aimed at pushing legislation forward. And if Oversight and Government Reform falls into the hands of more tepid leadership, it's not as important.

[ Parent ]
Personally, I think Waxman v Dingell was a much more significant fight than Lieberman v world. (4.00 / 3)
And I'm kindof bummed that the netroots, or to be really honest, the bloggers specifically, were more interested in Lieberman than Waxman.

I don't know that phone calls would have had any more influence on the House fight than the Senate fight, but I don't think it would have had any less influence.  Freshmen and sophomores in particular might have been influenced somewhat by phone calls.  Senators OTOH really weren't likely to care what we thought; they cared about their own opinions and the administration's.  

The optimum situation would have been Waxman winning, and Lieberman chairing Veteran's Affairs, but if I had to choose, I think the House fight was much much much more consequential for things that actually matter, like global warming legislation.  I'm reasonably satisfied with the outcome, but wish the netroots role in these two fights had been a little different.  Waxman was the real struggle here, and I think we missed it.


100% Agree (0.00 / 0)
That's why I'm comfortable with the leadership approach taken thus far.  High publicity bipartisanship, low publicity progressive policy.  That approach is a winner, and it looks like that's where we're headed.

[ Parent ]
health care (0.00 / 0)
why is Waxman considered better on health care?

He isn't a whole lot better (0.00 / 0)
both have co-introduced single-payer legislation and are great on health care. The issue is the environment.  

John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power

[ Parent ]
I'm glad to see Waxman win this spot ... (4.00 / 1)
...and I've been critical for decades of Dingell's stance on auto pollution and efficiency. But the wholesale trashing of Dingell seen across wwwLand is irksome. On most issues, from before he even arrived in DC, Dingell has been a progressive Democrat who, unlike a certain other fellow who kept his chairmanship this week, never opted to back a Republican for President or down-ticket seats. Dingell deserved to lose the chairmanship. He doesn't deserve to be scorned.

Who scorned him? .. (0.00 / 0)
Dingell isn't a bad guy .. he(and the auto industry he protected) were too blind to see the handwriting on the wall

[ Parent ]
This SHOULD Go Without Saying (4.00 / 3)
In fact, were it not for his shilling for Detroit, one could well characterize Dinglell as one of the real heroes of the House for longer than most folks here have been alive.

The problem here is institutional, more than personal.  The Democrats never have been sufficiently strong, and disciplined to stand up to the sort of weasily blackmail politics that the auto industry has always practiced... and neither has the UAW, for the most part.

As long as labor continues to shill for the companies that employ them, rather than stand with the public interest, they will undercut their moral authority, and hence their own power, and they will have a similar affect on the Democratic Party as well.

It's mistaken to blame any one individual for this state of affairs, and indeed, demonizing Dingell for this merely serves to distract attention from the far more intractable set of problems that his chairmanship was only a symptom of.

"Senate passes expanded GI bill despite Bush, McCain opposition"


[ Parent ]
UAW Concessions (4.00 / 1)
I recently learned that the UAW succumbed to the pressure to equalize wages in the auto industry.  In other words, once again, they (were forced to) agreed to the Catepillar model.  In 1992 the UAW was unprepared for battle with Catepillar.  The company locked up all community support, controlled the narrative and provoked a strike.  The issue was the demand for a new hire wage that was half what current workers were getting.  The company hired scabs, paid them at the 'new rate'.  The UAW went back to work, but Catepillar kept the scabs.  16 years later, the vast majority of the workforce is making 10-15 an hour instead of 25-30.  Another blow to moving workers up the economic ladder.

What was the narrative?---UAW workers earn too much money.  Sound familiar?

I live in a true blue state--I will have a choice in November


[ Parent ]
I'm not too sure about this (0.00 / 0)
The statistics that I have seen do not show that the UAW has succumbed to pressure to equalize wages in the auto industry. This site, whose credibility I cannot vouch for, has a chart showing total compensation for various workers. It shows that Big 3 autoworkers make $73 per hour (that would be inclusive of all health benefits, pension, etc), while US Toyota workers make $48.

Evidently the data in the chart comes from here. (It's in the sidebar.) The source ultimately appears to be the Big 3, so it very well could be biased. Still, before I believe that wages in the auto industry have been harmonized, I would want to see some data to that effect.

Also, as an aside, I would put myself in the camp that favors the government loaning the UAW the money to buy the Big 3. That would seem to make the whole wage thingy a lot easier to work out.


[ Parent ]
Agreed Meteor Blades (0.00 / 0)
I thought it was time for Dingell to go largely b/c 28 yrs as either the Chair or Ranking Member is too long and b/c he is so in bed with the auto industry.  However, outside of the auto stuff and the environment, which are very important issues, I bet you can't much difference b/w Dingell and Waxman.  Dingell is excellent on a host of very important issues especially health care.  He has introduced a single payer bill in every Congress he has served and was the leader on the Patient's Bill of Rights legislation in the late 1990s.  I am a strong supporter of CAFE standards and the environment but some of the stuff I have read made me think Dingell was a conservative Bush Dog which he isn't.

It was time to move on but he should be thanked for his service.  He did a lot of good and progressive things as Chair of Energy and Commerce.


[ Parent ]
Key Point About Waxman (0.00 / 0)
This should be obvious, but in case it's not, Waxman is not just an effective individual, he builds effective teams, and uses them well.

Being chair of the Energy and Commerce Committee means that all the staffers on that committee are, essentially, part of his team.  This can be a real powerhouse.

"Senate passes expanded GI bill despite Bush, McCain opposition"


I forget where I read this... (0.00 / 0)
but apparently it's Kuchinich and some guy I've never heard of vying for Waxman's old seat.

What do you think about that?


Horses and carts (0.00 / 0)
Chris, I'm beginning to think you see the world through rose colored glasses.  Or maybe it's my strong ties to my ethnic group that makes me want to spit three times whenever you say:  
The House is alright. We done good in that branch of Congress. It looks very likely that progressives will have a major voice at the table for all of Obama's legislative priorities.

I cringe when, in your exuberance, you express the possibility that Obama will do right by us in the remaining appointments.  

It is really great that there are more good folks than blue dogs this time around. Let us not forget Steny Hoyer.  The bottom line is nothing great will happen without action in the streets. We need to back up our allies and force Obama to do the right thing.
I give up on the quote business.  The first paragraph is yours, the next two are mine.



I live in a true blue state--I will have a choice in November

looks like Lux is doing his job (0.00 / 0)
as progressive liaison. blogs on message.

Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search