Complications With Using TARP For Automakers

by: Chris Bowers

Fri Dec 12, 2008 at 14:33


Hard to believe it, but the Bush administration might save us from congressional Republicans:

The White House and the Treasury gave strong indications Friday that the U.S. government, at least temporarily, would help prop up the American auto industry.

"Because Congress failed to act, we will stand ready to prevent an imminent failure until Congress reconvenes and acts to address the long-term viability of the industry," Treasury spokeswoman Brookly McLaughlin said.

And White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said the administration is considering using the Wall Street rescue fund to prevent the USA's strapped carmakers from failing.

While the White House is considering using TARP funds as a stop-gap measure for the automakers, there is "only" $15 billion left in the first installment of the TARP fund. First Read reports:

The Treasury Department tells NBC News that of the first $350 billion installment of the TARP money, $335 billion has either been spent or earmarked and $15 billion remains.

And remember that in order to get the second $350 billion from the $700 billion, the administration must notify Congress. At that point, Congress could simply do nothing and the administration would get their money. The only way to hold it up would be to proactively vote to DENY them the money.

So, if the White House comes in and uses TARP funding for the automakers, it might result in one final, $350 billion spending extravaganza for Paulson and the Bush administration. However, the remaining the $15 billion in the TARP fund would cover the $14 billion legislation voted down last night, and Congress will be able to pass auto legislation as early as January 6th, even despite Republican opposition.

Lots of factors at play here, including announcements that GM will temporarily close 21 factories, most of them through the end of January. I still find it incredibly frustrating that so much is going wrong during this lame-duck session. Republicans seem hell bent on causing whatever final damage they can.

Chris Bowers :: Complications With Using TARP For Automakers

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Bush will use the TARP (4.00 / 1)
No way will he risk officially starting a Greater Depression while he's still President. And, he'll do it the way the Congressional Democrats wanted - from the TARP, which is getting wasted anyway, so it's not much of a loss.

I wonder if the Dem leadership is noticing that standing up to Bush, not giving in, is the way to get better policy? It's really ironic that the proposal Pelosi passed was for all intents and purposes Bush's proposal. even more ironically, hard as the Dem leadership tried to cave to Bush, they failed, and now that get what they originally asked for.

Too bad they succeeded on caving in on the TARP itself.  


It seems like a kind of a convenient coincidence (0.00 / 0)
That there's $15 billion left in TARP and this is exactly how much the auto bailout was originally meant to contain? Is it possible someone at some point was specifically trying to set aside that money in case this situation came up? Is it possible that the amount of money "left" in TARP is something open to interpretation and that they fudged the numbers to make the "remaining" amount exactly $15 billion as of this morning?

More importantly, is there ANY way to get the white house to use the "remaining" $15 billion instead of dipping into the other $350 billion?


Quid pro quo (0.00 / 0)
They've been making noise about the needing the last $350 billion. That might be the price.

[ Parent ]
Union Influence (0.00 / 0)
I think the union's response was about like the CEO's showing up on private jets.

I'm probably a lot more fiscally conservative than most here.

I'm not interested anymore in this bailout.

I have no dog in this fight and rather hope it fails.

In the meantime, 35,000 jobs will be eliminated by BofA.  No union.


Fiscally conservative (4.00 / 3)
Can you remind me what that actually means, and point to examples? I'm pretty confused over that term lately.

[ Parent ]
we're hurting bad here in Michigan and we need the bailout (4.00 / 1)
but even for me, and this could literally cost me my job, giving Paulson the second $350 Billion is going too far.  I'd rather lose my job than give them the second installment.  If anything, that may be part of what last night's kabuki dance was all about.  and with Corker on the air right now totally lying about the UAW and saying they would not offer none, zero concessions, well, to hell with.  Unemployment is better than giving into the republican, conservative lunatics and the conservatives are lunatics.

Three Dem Nos (0.00 / 0)
Baucus, Tester and Blanche Lincoln voted no.  Lincoln has an explanation on her web site: "no credible plan" (although the automakers actually had more by far than Wall St) and she wanted to take the money from TARP.  Nobody except maybe Tester and Baucus know why they voted no.

None of the Montana papers was calling out no although one of the half dozen or so I checked had a reader poll that was 2-1 against.  It wasn't a big story, or even much of a story at all unlike the Montana football team and the White House christmas tree which was the star of Baucus' web site.

Left in the West thought that maybe Tester was opposed to funding for mass transit.  Tester grilled the auto execs and pushed them to take personal pay cuts.  They did.  Not that that influenced his vote.  Meanwhile Sweitzer is eliminating the governor's ball this year and slicing the state budget.  Baucus was a big proponent of the bank bailout but stiffs a company that makes somrthing.

Refresh my mind, why are Baucus and Terster Democrats in the first place?


You have to remember ... (0.00 / 0)
I don't know about Baucus .. but Tester voted no .. because it wasn't going to pass ... at least that is my guess .. that way .. he could claim he is against it .. and keep peace out in Montana ... remember ... the Senate often times .. is a bunch of kabuki

[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search