Cabinet Appointment Round-up

by: Chris Bowers

Tue Dec 16, 2008 at 19:41


I have been somewhat delinquent on this the last couple of days, but there are three recent cabinet picks I haven't said anything about:

  • Shaun Donovan, Housing and Urban Development: The chatter I have heard on Donovan from progressives behind the scene is generally positive. Seems smart, earnest, and perhaps a bit of a technocrat. I would put Donovan in the "cautiously optimistic" category.

  • Arne Duncan, Education: Given that Obama has generally tried to avoid factional fights, Duncan seemed like the obvious pick. He was the only candidate who was short-listed by both the "efficiency" faction and by the teachers. Combine this with his Chicago background, and he made perfect sense. Not sure if I am "meh" on this one or "cautiously optimistic." I guess if I am not sure, than I am "meh."

  • Tom Vilsack, Agriculture: As I noted before, there was never much hope for a progressive agriculture pick. I am wary of Vilsack, who was one-time chair of the DLC. However, he doesn't appear to be in the egregiously bad category that I was afraid of for this post. A bit of a disappointment but, considering my expectations for this post, not much of one.

Overall, there is a clear pattern where Obama is working to avoid any sort of factional fights within the institutional progressive / Democratic ecosystem with his picks. The strategy appears to be steering clear of rocking any boats within the broader media and political establishment as well. The basic policy seems to be conflict avoidance, above all else. This is, of course, exactly how Obama said he would govern during 2007-2008. While I am disappointed that more sweeping progressive change does not appear to be on the agenda, it is still striking change from the Bush / Cheney years. Obama is basically fulfilling his promises.

More left-wing Democrats will dominate the House leadership, and also be involved in the conservation among White House senior staff. Developments in the Senate are far less encouraging (Lieberman as committee chair, Reid still ineffective, Bayh forming Blue Dog Senate caucus). Still, while I am not terribly excited about the cabinet and the Senate, with a decent array of progressives among the White House senior staff and House leadership, progressives should have a voice in all major policy decisions during the next two years of the trifecta.

Hope is infectious when you are out of power, and the reality of taking power rarely meets your ideals. This is especially true if you are a left-wing Democrat, since your own party often works to distance itself from you. However, like a supermajority of Americans, I still hope that what the Obama administration ends up doing will turn the country around. Things are so bad right now, that even if I end up disagreeing with some of the legislation or appointments that the Obama administration makes, I still really really really hope everything they do works.

Update: Link added with more on Vilsack pick.

Chris Bowers :: Cabinet Appointment Round-up

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
As this country slides deeper and deeper in Great Depression II, (0.00 / 0)
all this shit won't matter.  At.  All.

People will be concerned with surviving mass riots, etc., throughout the globe.  Obama may have to be a saviour just like his idol, Lincoln, and FDR was.

I think a trillion dollar stimulus bill is sufficiently progressive for me as well as - hopefully - good Supreme Court picks.

For some reason, it seems that Obama has some pathological and deep-seated psychological need for Republicans to like him.  Seriously.  It's weird.


Arne Duncan (4.00 / 3)
Jack and Jill Politics, an otherwise stridently pro-Obama blog, has an extremely anti-Duncan post up. This is basically the only strong opinion I've seen expressed about Duncan anywhere. The interesting thing about this post is the author is actually from Chicago and is basing their opinion of Duncan on their experiences with CPS. (Though I don't know if this means the author's point is to be taken more seriously because they're familiar with the guy, or taken with a grain of salt because they're potentially so close to the situation that they may not be able to separate an objective view of Duncan from their opinions on disagreements over local policies.)

Can you remind us (4.00 / 1)
why your expectations were always low when it came to the Agriculture pick?

Also, I smiled at this telling line: "Not sure if I am "meh" on this one or "cautiously optimistic." I guess if I am not sure, than I am "meh.""


How is Vilsack not "egregiously bad"? (4.00 / 1)
Because he's not an actual Monsanto lobbyist?



This is an important pick (4.00 / 2)
Here's John Nichols, written before Vilsack was picked:

The USDA is a key player when it comes to energy policy, both because of the rise of biofuels and because of the increasingly adventurous grant-making by its Renewable Energy Systems and Energy Efficiency Improvements Program.

The USDA's Forest Service administers almost 300,000 square miles of national forests and grasslands.

The secretary of Agriculture is, as well, often a definitional player in trade debates -- as the question of how the United States supports farmers remains an essential one when it comes to forging trade agreements and engagement with the World Trade Organization.

With a $97 billion annual budget and roughly 110,000 employees -- more than the departments of Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development, and Energy combined -- it is one of the largest non-defense agencies in the federal government. And its hand is everywhere, with thousands of county extension offices spread across every state.
Bill Clinton and George Bush made what might best be described as "hack" appointments to the Department of Agriculture, naming political pals with limited real-world experience in contemporary farm and food debates. In Bush's administration, in particular, the job of the secretary of Agriculture has been to promote the agenda of corporate agribusiness with regard to trade policy and the lowering of food safety standards. As such, there is a lot of repair work to be done.

The question is whether Obama will nominate someone who is ready to do the work.

Most of the early speculation regarding the Agriculture secretary nomination focused on former Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack, who was briefly a contender for the 2008 Democratic presidential nod before dropping out to back first Hillary Clinton and, finally, Obama.

Vilsack is a capable administrator with the right partisan credentials.
But he was only at the top of the list of Agriculture secretary prospects because he is a prominent Democrat who comes from what Washington insiders know as a "farm state." As governor of Iowa, Vilsack had to engage with farm issues. But that embrace was anything but inspired. Family farm activists, fair-trade campaigners and advocates for organic foods were regularly disappointed by the stands he took. The Organic Consumers Association was blunt, declaring: "Vilsack has a glowing reputation as being a schill for agribusiness biotech giants like Monsanto."

http://www.thenation.com/blogs...


[ Parent ]
Sounds like some criteria for Senate appointments (0.00 / 0)
Overall, there is a clear pattern where Obama is working to avoid any sort of factional fights within the institutional progressive / Democratic ecosystem with his picks.

Substitute "State Governor about to appoint a Senator" for Obama, and you get the philosophy of some in the person to appoint as a replacement Senator.


Well--Salazar is out of the Senate (4.00 / 2)
That's a plus.  Hopefully the CO gov will not appoint John Salazar, but will appoint Hickenlooper--the Denver mayor--instead.  I like his work in trying to bring mass transit to Denver and I think he's been a good mayor and a good Dem.

is he pro-gay? (0.00 / 0)


For some reason, it seems that Obama has some pathological and deep-seated psychological need for Republicans to like him.  Seriously.  It's weird.

[ Parent ]
A google reveals some promising positions in that area (4.00 / 3)
http://gaytravel.about.com/od/...

Established in part by Denver's current mayor, the progressive and very gay-supportiver John Hickenlooper, the Wynkoop Brewing Company (1634 18th St., 303-297-2700) was one of the first businesses to help jump-start the rejuvenation of the city's historic Lower Downtown (LoDo) neighborhood.

Pro-gay, pro-urban renewal, and pro-beer. (If true,) sounds good to me!


[ Parent ]
White House progressives (4.00 / 1)
So who are these progressives on the White House staff, anyway?  Rahm Emanuel?  Larry Summers?

well (4.00 / 1)
Melody Barnes, Philip Schiliro, some union guy (can't find his name), and I would include Tom Daschle only because his progressive on health care, his issue. There are quite a few others. His staff is better than his cabinet.

I wish there were more progressives, but honestly this is something I never thought about when volunteering for Obama. If he implements his policies as promised than none of this will matter to me.

I do hope his Labor Sec is very progressive.


[ Parent ]
The concern I have (4.00 / 3)
Is that at a moment when major breaks from the policies of the last 30 years are required, Obama and his cabinet picks will instead try small-time incrementalism that won't arrest the slide of the US into a long depression on the model of 1873-1896.

A trillion dollar stimulus may not actually work without a totally new approach on health care, which we're not getting; without a totally new approach on food, which we're not getting; a totally new approach on transportation, which the jury's still out on (I'm still keenly awaiting the Secretary of Transportation pick); and a totally new approach on energy, which we may actually get.


Vilsack appointment (4.00 / 1)
Tom's corporate connections are correct, unfortunately. What's also true is that he was somewhat of a  hero while working with destitute farmers during the farm crisis. I worked with him on several cases and always came away impressed. And he also has worked closely with organic and NGMO farmers.  I think he will surprise us.

Besides that, he lives close to the Peoples Republic.


And is friendly with Harkin (4.00 / 2)
Who's probably the only guy with power on this issue that is anything close to open to reform.

John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power

[ Parent ]
Humane Society endorsed Vilsack (0.00 / 0)
They said he'd be an animal-friendly choice.  It's possible that they were just doing an "Anybody But Stenholm" thing though.  

Does anyone know specific stuff on Vilsack and animal treatment?  

Donkeylicious


Vilsack (0.00 / 0)
The Vilsack pick is very disappointing. As others have noted, he's all but an official lobbyist for Monsanto. I have seen zero evidence that he has any interest whatsoever in reforming the subsidy and tariff structure in US agriculture. For that matter, as the governor of a state with a relatively low rate of poverty, he has little relevant experience with all of the aid programs that USDA runs.

Overall, this is just a depressingly unimaginative "safe" pick.

Some seem to think Vilsack will be better than expected. My own opinion is that the best (the best!) that we can hope for is some marginal improvement around the edges, with better support for conservation programs and such. But this slight progress is very likely to be swamped by the disaster of a huge bailout for ethanol producers. (Not farmers, mind you...)

And lest we forget, since Grassley is pretty likely to retire, Vilsack's trip to the cabinet means the Dems give up their best candidate for that seat.


Awfully male cabinet (0.00 / 0)
Are there any women besides Hillary Clinton?  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_transition_of_Barack_Obama (0.00 / 0)
Secretary of Homeland Security, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, EPA Administrator, Council on Environmental Quality Chair, Council of Economic Advisers chair, Domestic Policy Council chair, "Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change" (Climate Czar), both rumored Secretary of Labor picks.

[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search