Maybe you aren't getting the whole story?

by: Tim Tagaris

Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 10:50


(Thanks to Matt, Chris and Mike for giving me the opportunity to post this video and text up on Open Left.  Relevant disclaim: I proudly work for Chris Dodd's Presidential campaign -- Tim)


You might not have thought it was possible after reading the first reports following the IAFF Presidential Forum. 

"Clinton, Obama address IAFF forum," barked the headline at MSNBC's "First Read." The AP story finally got around to mentioning Senator Dodd in the 18th of 25 paragraphs. 

But it was Chris Dodd who stole the show at the forum, much like he has throughout the campaign with his bold leadership on Iraq, his defense of the Constitution, and calling for a Corporate Carbon Tax.

Some choose to back the candidates they think are in the lead -- the fire fighters selected the candidate they know has the vision to lead.

Today, the 280,000 person organization of professional fire fighters and paramedics has officially endorsed it's candidate in the 2008 Democratic Primary:

They've selected: Chris Dodd

More on why this is is a race-changing endorsement on the flip.

Tim Tagaris :: Maybe you aren't getting the whole story?
How this changes the race
It's not just what the fire fighters stand for, or the awesome gold and yellow shirts ... it's the organizational skills they bring to the table.

Schaitberger said firefighters play an integral role in communities across the country and, perhaps more significantly, understand the caucus process in Iowa "better than all the highly paid Washington types."

As the only union to endorse John Kerry in those heady fall days, you only have to look back to 2004 to see the IAFF has proven they know how to help a candidate win in Iowa and New Hampshire.

St. Louis Post-Dispatch: "A nearly secret weapon Kerry had in Iowa was the organizing work of the 263,000-member firefighters union, which is about 2,400 strong in Iowa…Because they work 24-hour shifts, two-thirds of the union members are off work at any given time, meaning that 1,600 could go to caucuses Monday, and each was asked to bring five people in a 'carload for Kerry.'" [St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 1/23/04]

Remember, John Kerry was down over 30 points in New Hampshire as late as November 2003.

Why Dodd?
Chris Dodd authored the Family and Medical Leave Act ... finally passing the bill into law after two Presidents, and two vetoes.

Chris Dodd wrote the FIRE and SAFER Acts that made sure equipment and training our first responders need was geting down to the fire stations in neighborhoods across the country BEFORE September 11th.

Chris Dodd isn't waiting until he gets elected to lead on Iraq, the Constitution, and middle class issues like the sub-prime mortgage crisis ... he is doing is NOW.

What's next
The official endorsement happens today at 11 A.M., and then the campaign hits the road to share the good news in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada.

We'll have on-going coverage over at the campaign website, going live from the road as often as possible.


Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Of course ... the shirts! (0.00 / 0)

Tim


Non-binding on locals (0.00 / 0)
What about the fact that the locals aren't obliged to fall in line with the endorsement of the national union? This might be what Dodd needs to finally get the traction he deserves, but couldn't that very lack of traction lead to problems in transforming that national endorsement to boots on the ground in the key states considering his polling in Iowa is often less than the margin of error and he's not doing much better in NH.

I'm not trying to be a concern troll here, as were I eligible to vote I'd probably be a soft Dodd supporter right now, I'm merely asking whether the campaign has any reason to believe that some locals might not follow the national union in their endorsements.

Forgotten Countries - a foreign policy-focused blog


[ Parent ]
It's a logistical nightmare... (0.00 / 0)
...for a national campaign to try and court each and every local individually.  Getting the national office to endorse is an immediate way to tell every local that this is candidate who's at least worth supporting.  For the candidates who don't get the national endorsement, harnessing the logistical power of that union's membership means going to every local union leader in each targetted state and convincing them to support a candidacy that the national office already considered and passed by.  That's a headache and a half.

Even state union endorsements are often nonbinding on locals.  I've worked for candidates who got the state endorsement of a union but lost a few individual locals. 

That's just the nature of the game, and shouldn't really be a big concern for an endorsed candidate.

Yeah I blog.


[ Parent ]
Congratulations Tim, but Obama-induced pet peeve... (0.00 / 0)
I'm sick of all the talk of vision.  Your extended entry includes the better frame:
Chris Dodd isn't waiting until he gets elected to lead on Iraq, the Constitution, and middle class issues like the sub-prime mortgage crisis ... he is doing it NOW.
Forget vision. We're not hiring Nostradamus - we're hiring somebody who gets things done. I want to see execution. Sure, some candidates have been great at being ahead of this curve or that curve, but what I want to know is what have they done - and how successful are they at doing things.  Action, performance, execution - not Vision attracts me. 

For me the selling of politicians with vision is like the marketing of laundry detergent with promises of great scents. I'm a discerning shopper and a primary voter, I want proof.  Your soap commercial needs to have a white shirt get fouled by a dog, thrown into a vat of soup, wiped on the sweaty back of Jim Belushi, and then before my eyes, quickly cleaned in a glass wash tub thanks to the soap you're selling. Hell, I'd be even more impressed if you showed the chemical bonds of the phospholipids you're using.  I want the best person in the Oval Office amphiphile in the soap.

Selling Vision without action is crap. Promising action in 2009 is even worse for the Senators who are now in positions where they could take action... now.  It's worse than Edwards' throwing popcorn from the cheap seats which is what it sometimes looks like when he implores action from outside of the Senate. At least JRE has some cover.  It must suck for Clinton, Biden and Obama that the bill people around the country are contacting their Senators to support is, oh, um, Dodd's Gulf Coast Recovery Bill of 2007 (S1668). 

That's the kind of proof I want.  That muscle is not vision, it's performance.  High performance is what we need in my opinion. 

The next President is going to have a nigh on impossible task of rebuilding what George Bush and conservative government has been horrifically good at dismantling and sabotaging. Namely everything.  Spare me the vision. Perform!

John McCain is dishonest


Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search