Caroline Camelot Kennedy to Senator Paris Hilton

by: Matt Stoller

Wed Dec 24, 2008 at 12:56


This is the result of a two week long backroom political fight.

Resistance is emerging among Democratic officials against Caroline Kennedy as she pursues Hillary Rodham Clinton's seat in the United States Senate, with Gov. David A. Paterson bristling over suggestions that her selection is inevitable, according to his advisers, and other leading Democrats concerned that she is too beholden to Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg.
Matt Stoller :: Caroline Camelot Kennedy to Senator Paris Hilton
The governor is frustrated and chagrined, the advisers said, because he believes that he extended Ms. Kennedy the chance to demonstrate her qualifications but that her operatives have exploited the opportunity to convey a sense that she is all but appointed already. He views this as an attempt to box him in, the advisers said.

"You have people going around saying, 'Oh yeah, it's a done deal,' " said one of the advisers, who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the selection process and did not want to anger the governor. "The quickest way to not get something you want is to step into somebody's face."

The governor's frustration follows reports last week that Kevin Sheekey, a top deputy to Mr. Bloomberg who has been advising Ms. Kennedy, had called a labor leader and told him that Ms. Kennedy was going to be senator, "so get on board now," and that a member of Senator Edward M. Kennedy's staff was helping Ms. Kennedy reach out to unions.

It was not clear on Tuesday whether the governor's reaction would seriously damage Ms. Kennedy's chances to win the appointment or if it merely reflected Mr. Paterson's desire to regain control of the selection process after Ms. Kennedy's very public political debut.

But Ms. Kennedy's ties to Mr. Bloomberg's political team and her waffling over whether she would support a Democrat in next year's mayoral race appear to be angering some Democrats. On Tuesday, Sheldon Silver, the Assembly speaker, became the most senior elected official in the state to say that that Mr. Paterson should not select Ms. Kennedy to the Senate seat.

There are many people in New York politics that are gunning for Kennedy, and only one faction backing her.  Senator Chuck Schumer and Michael Bloomberg are part of the 'Wall Street' political faction, deriving their power from Manhattan elites, publicity, and huge sums of money provided by the financial industry.  Their political operatives - Josh Isay comes to mind - are the ones ferociously pushing Kennedy.  They are also part of the machine that supported Joe Lieberman against Ned Lamont in Connecticut (lots of CT voters work in NYC), helped Chris Shays for reelection in 2006 and 2008, and attacked Eliot Spitzer with a vengeance (behind the scenes supporting his primary challenger Tom Suozzi backed by right-wing money from Home Depot exec Ken Langone).

Spitzer fell because of his own personal weakness, but he fell hard because he made a lot of enemies on Wall Street while building no sustainable alliances with anyone else in the state.  Now it seems like the Wall Street axis that helped to take him down has begun to make the same mistake Spitzer made with the Kennedy appointment.  Rather than build a coalition, the Wall Street crew allied with the Kennedy family and is clearly bullying the Governor with an aggressive PR campaign around celebrity, while hoping that Kennedy's glow from Obama will reflect onto her Senate chances.

This is angering a lot of factions in New York politics, including minorities in New York whose candidate lost to Bloomberg in 2005, Andrew Cuomo's crew, Shellie Silver and Albany politicians, update Democrats, Republicans, and certain progressive whites and labor interests that have been boxed out by Bloomberg.  Stories like this, this, this, this, this, and this are the result.

Caroline Kennedy is being transformed right now from a liberal inheritor of Camelot and loyal behind-the-scemes public servant who bestoyed the family's blessing on Barack Obama to what Republican Peter King calls a "People Magazine celebrity" who "has never held a real job" and is being manipulated by Wall Street interests and sleazy Manhattan politicians.

There's some element of truth to this 'transformation', but selective cherry-picking of details from anyone's life can tell any story you want.  What is cherry-picked is a function of political power and political calculation from the coalition backing her, and the people opposing her.  This is a factional fight within New York politics, and Kennedy and her life has become the football.  At first, before the opposition had time to organize, we heard what her backers wanted us to hear - Caroline Camelot Kennedy.  But now, because they didn't organize a sufficiently strong political coalition and alienated allies, she is being turned into a lazy and secretive political heiress.

Some people are even comparing her to Sarah Palin, though to be fair, Palin did run and win the Governor's office in Alaska, and Kennedy has done nothing of that ilk.  I think a more apt analogy is Paris Hilton, a celebrity who is famous because she's famous.  Even Fran Drescher is asking for the Senate seat, and with her advocacy for cancer patients, Drescher might be more accomplished than Kennedy in politics.

I don't know how Kennedy gets appointed now.  It could still happen, though she's a much weaker candidate for reelection in 2010 than she was even two weeks ago.  That video of her running from reporters is awful, and the narrative of an entitled celebrity heiress is being cemented.  Obviously politics is fluid, and perhaps she can do something remarkable, but this political fight has really damaged her reputation.  I suppose there's a reason she kept out of the limelight her whole life.


Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
What I'd like to see (4.00 / 3)
is some sort of political debate/forum, maybe on Meet the Press or something, where the top candidates for the Senate seat discuss the issues.

Get Caroline Kennedy, Andrew Cuomo, Jerrod Nadler, Carolyn Maloney and let them answer questions about local and national issues.

I think that would quickly alter the landscape, and NOT in Kennedy's favor. In fact, Kennedy would have no chance at the appointment if such a debate happened. She just isn't as well informed about these matters as the other candidates.

I'm pulling for Maloney myself, although Nadler sounds very progressive.


not so much the apt analogy (4.00 / 1)
Paris Hilton is famous because she is a rich heiress to a corporate dynasty and she used porn tapes of herself to market the Paris Hilton brand name image. C'mon, John McCain tried smear Obama with a Paris Hilton link and got smacked down, looks like Paris has 10 times more media savvy than Caroline Kennedy ever will. The best analogy probably is her mother, Jackie O.

Political dynasties suck but America sticks with them like a moldy smell, odds are good we will get Repub prez candidate Jeb! in 4 or 8 years.


Sarah Palin (4.00 / 2)
also finally did on camera interviews.

she didn't just answer the questions she liked on a take home test.

the video was super damaging, THAT is the moment where she most looks like Paris Hilton, jumping into her car, waving from the window. total nonsense.

it also shows she is totally ill-prepared to be a senator. this is how she handles the press? even with her billionaire adviser? she's a train wreck, this is looking like the Hillary Clinton campaign melt down.

~* the * Will * to go on *~


The "Paris Hilton" Thing Is Unhelpful. (4.00 / 1)
Kennedy has accomplished some things -- she spent two years raising money for schools, she sits on reputable boards, she co-wrote two books on important topics that alienated and provoked no one, etc.  Now, it's not enough to mandate her Senate appointment, but it's not pure fluff either.

But criticizing her like this is only going to make folks in the middle want to rally around her, much in the same way they rallied around Sen. Clinton and Gov. Palin upon facing (what were perceived to be) sexist attacks.

Instead, focus on making the case that someone else is better, like Nadler.


Paris Hilton wrote a book too (4.00 / 1)
She needed a little help with it, but then again so did Caroline Kennedy. (And I'm not sure why writing books that do not alienate and provoke anyone is supposed to be a positive thing.)

Paris also does charitable work, like Caroline Kennedy and every other rich person who doesn't have to work for a living.


[ Parent ]
um (4.00 / 2)
But criticizing her like this is only going to make folks in the middle want to rally around her, much in the same way they rallied around Sen. Clinton and Gov. Palin upon facing (what were perceived to be) sexist attacks.

I'm not sure that posting on a mid-sized liberal blog is going to push people in New York one way or the other, and I'm not sure why that should matter in this case.  I just want to explain to readers why Kennedy is getting trashed today, when two weeks ago she was an angel.

I will probably do a post on Nadler.


[ Parent ]
What has the world come to when Palin is favorably compared to a Kennedy (4.00 / 2)
on a left blog?

Unfortunately, it seems an apt comparison...

Hopefully Paterson will do the right thing and appoint a true liberal/progressive Senator.  

But its hard to overlook celebrity.  


I would like to see someone with more of a record than her (4.00 / 1)
and with backing from some people other than wall street, but lets not compare her to a women that propelled herself to fame the way Paris did.

In My Mind (4.00 / 1)
In my mind, Cuomo has always been the obvious, safe choice for this seat. There's something slightly insane to me in the concept of selecting a political neophyte for a Senate seat, especially one in one of the largest and most expensive states in the Union. Surely you would want someone who has actually proven they can win statewide when the stakes are that high.

I disagree. (0.00 / 0)
It should be a woman or a minority.  Sorry, but with so few of either in the Senate, this is an opportunity to at least stay even.  Maloney would be my choice.

[ Parent ]
They're Not Mutually Exclusive (0.00 / 0)
Although I admittedly don't know of any women or minority candidates on the bench in New York who have had success statewide.

Bottom line, however, is that whoever the Paterson puts in this seat will be commanding a $50-75 million dollar re-election campaign in 2012 (Hillary spent $45 million last time around). It doesn't make any sense to make an investment like that in someone who is still running on training wheels in terms of their political skills.  


[ Parent ]
Sorry I'm just now getting back to you (0.00 / 0)
Though Cuomo or Nadler would be excellent senators, I think this would be an opportunity to get another woman or minority into the Senate.  I think Maloney would be a good choice and she isn't running on training wheels.

[ Parent ]
Growing up in the 70's, in NYC (0.00 / 0)
when her mother was constantly hounded by the paparazzi and in all the society and celebrity pages, I remember how Caroline consistently and aggressively avoided the media, and appeared to make no effort to hide her disdain for it. I recall both feeling sympathetic towards her, since she was just a kid who had every right to her privacy and who, as a private person, owed the media and public nothing, but at the same time just a tad annoyed and perplexed that she didn't at least give the media something, however superficial, just some small bit of herself, to shut it up and not come across as aloof and above it all. In the sum of things, it was really neither here nor there, compared to all the other things going on in the news. But it did register, on some level.

And now she appears to be doing it again, strenuously avoiding the media and being her old coy "I just want to be left alone" Bardotesque self, except, this time there's no excuse for it whatsoever IF she's really serious about being appointed senator--and she appears to be serious about it. I don't know if it's arrogance or shyness that's causing this coyness. But unlike when she was just a private person being thrust into the public spotlight, this time it matters. A lot. And her inability and/or unwillingness to rise to the occasion and just face the media and forcefully and convincingly argue why she should get the seat is, I think, more disqualifying than her lack of electoral experience, as opposed to Hillary, who absolutely faced the media and public when she first ran for the senate (however honestly and convincingly, of course, being a whole other question, but at least she did this much).

I'm sure that she's a very nice, decent, intelligent, accomplished and thoughful person, and she might even make a great senator. But she's yet to prove to me that she's qualified for this job, based on her life's work and unimpressive "campaigning" for it. Maybe it's because I grew up and lived most of my life in NYC, but we tend to like our politicians a bit on the outspoken, rough and unshy side, and Kennedy is none of these things.

The liberal soul shall be made fat. He who waters shall be watered also himself. (Proverbs 11:25)


"gunning for Kennedy" (4.00 / 2)
is a particularly unfortunate phrase to find on a left blog

Going (0.00 / 0)
The McCain Hilton comparison tops it too. next he is going to do the dukakis comparisons.. oh wait he has already done that!.. wonder where he is getting his political consulting from.

Totally Tone deaf.


[ Parent ]
So much sour grapes (0.00 / 0)
And I am glad to see matt cheer up her fantasy lady again "Wow she is good... His Response to her convention speed" and shore up her experience as governor too! The same time he is dissing a fellow democrat by using the experience card! (wonder where that card was used?.. hmm .. in a Certain dem primary and by certain republican maverick... Wonder how that turned out? Matt doesn't know!)

Hopefully NY dems --who favor Caroline over Cumo by ~47-23 in that qunipiac poll, repugs favor Cumo-- will primary Patterson or split third party if he snubs Caroline (Who Obama favors) based on sour grapes from repugs and their sympathizers (Puma's and the anti-Obama crowd).


What Constitutes Qualification? (0.00 / 0)
While I don't have a horse in this race, and would be happy with any Democrat who has been mentioned, I have gotten troubled by some of the level of objection being directed towards Ms. Kennedy-Schlossberg.

As Democrats and liberals, we have long accepted dynasty politics, and we need to look no further than Ms. Kennedy-Scholssberg's two Uncles, both adored icons in the progressive community. A Michigan Netroots favorite in the '06 cycle was State Senate candidate Andy Levin, son of a Congressman and nephew of a US Senator, who hadn't lived in Michigan for years prior to running (unsuccessfully as it turned out) for this seat.

As for necessary qualification, I would suggest that the 2006 cycle success of the Netroots, Ned Lamont, had "qualifications" on a par with Ms. Kennedy-Schlossberg. And the list of Netroots-supported and mainstream politico-supported candidates with "qualification" levels comparable or less than Ms. Kennedy-Schlossberg is endless.

If there are those who oppose her, then oppose her on good faith. Not in demeaning ways (comparisons to Paris Hilton by Rep. Ackerman) that will only harm her should she be the Governor's choice.


oh come on (4.00 / 2)
Stop flinging talking points here.  I'm not arguing about 'qualifications' or 'experience', that's just what you are trained to argue against.

[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search