A Straightforward Progressive Strategy On the Stimulus Fight

by: David Sirota

Tue Jan 13, 2009 at 12:23


I (obviously) agree with Mike about the need to push as hard as we can for the best economic stimulus package possible. There's simply no downside to it for progressives, or for the Obama administration. But, then, what should the progressive strategy be on the upcoming economic stimulus? What should be our lines in the sand? Let me suggest we break things down in a good, bad and ugly kind of way, as I did on CNN on Friday:

David Sirota :: A Straightforward Progressive Strategy On the Stimulus Fight
So first and foremost, progressives should be broadly supportive of public spending. We can get into a debate about what kind of spending is better, but as a concept, the more public spending we can get out of this bill, the better. And I say that not just because during a recession its moral to fund say, health care instead of business tax cuts, but also because its more economically effective. As Republican economist Mark Zandi admits, public spending delivers a better boost to the economy than tax cuts.

To that end, progressives should see tax cuts at this moment as conceptually bad. That's not to say that some tax cut proposals aren't better than others - certainly cutting taxes for the middle class is better than cutting taxes for banks. But let's be clear: If we continue to let the debate be framed and confined by tax cuts, it will ultimately mean a weaker stimulus package.

Finally, I think conceptually progressives should see any effort to link deficit reduction exclusively to entitlement "reform" (the euphemism for slashing Social Security and Medicare) as odiously awful. Obama has made noises recently suggesting we should link deficit reduction to entitlement "reform." And though he has not yet explained how he defines "reform," conservatives - as evidenced by the hard-core media campaign by the right that started this weekend - are obviously trying to trap him into a debate over slashing the two most popular government programs in American history. Progressives have to lay down markers right now so as to take those kinds of ideas completely off the table.

I think this is a pretty straightforward strategy for the progressive movement moving forward into these next critical weeks. The harder we push, the better the outcome - and the more political capital President Obama will have moving into his first 100 days.


Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
wait (0.00 / 0)
your computer broke AND your razor broke?

:)


Heh... (0.00 / 0)
Yeah...well, I decided to grow the beard because I've been doing some skiing and snowshoeing and the extra face protection keeps me (a tiny bit) warmer!

[ Parent ]
Ya...that too (4.00 / 1)
Ya...that too. Once a Philadelphian, always a Philadelphian!

[ Parent ]
Good decision on the haircut (0.00 / 0)
it was getting a little puffy.

[ Parent ]
An Eagles beard perhaps? (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Problem isn't taxes, it is income (0.00 / 0)
Yes, America's problem is not that taxes are too high for people with income, but that incomes are too low (and with the recession, there are too few jobs).


Looks like Frank and Dodd are willing release TARP funds with no oversight, demands or transparency (0.00 / 0)
I think this is appalling.  Sure a Democrat and a Democratic administration is now going to be in charge of disbursal of TARP funds, but that is absolutely NO REASON not to pass the bills intended to exercise control and oversight and transparency about these funds.  Elana Schor, the new person, at TPM makes this very, very clear.

Before acceding to Barack Obama's request for another $350 billion of financial bailout money, the House is set to take up a bill from Financial Services Committee chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) that would require some cash to be spent on foreclosure aid and set limits on executive compensation. But Frank's counterpart in the Senate, Banking Committee chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT), has suggested that yesterday's non-specific letter from Obama adviser Larry Summers might be enough to convince him that the incoming administration plans to spend the taxpayers' money more wisely.

And even Frank (before HuffPo reported it) has already shown his unquestioning faith in the Obama team. Here's what he said Friday while introducing his own bill to provide oversight of the second $350 billion:

[II]t doesn't have to be enacted. It would be helpful if it was. But if the bill passes the House with a large majority, and we have smart and cooperative people in this administration, I'm willing to accept their word that they will act as if it were the law.

Now to my question. How would progressives react if these were Republican lawmakers agreeing to take the word of John McCain -- or any Republican president succeeding George W. Bush? Would the response be universal alarm at Congress failing to exert even minimal oversight powers? Remember how much agita this remark caused?

Even though the resolution before the Senate is not as strong as I would like ... I will take the President at his word that he will try hard to pass a UN resolution and will seek to avoid war, if at all possible.

That was Hillary Clinton in October 2002, before the vote to authorize the Iraq war.

This is not how a representative democracy is supposed to work.  Cooperation is one thing, but abrogating your own power and giving up your own responsibilty to the public is a dereliction of their congressional duty.

"Incrementalism isn't a different path to the same place, it could be a different path to a different place"
Stoller


"broadly supportive of public spending" (4.00 / 1)
Don't we need to be more specific than that? There's all sorts of "public spending" that can just do more to fill the coffers of big corporations and give the already well-connected more access to the trough. Maybe you didn't want to get into that kind of specificity in this post, but there needs to be broad agreement among progressives about what constitutes worthy public spending.

Excellent post. (0.00 / 0)
I agree.  

Especially with this:

The harder we push, the better the outcome - and the more political capital President Obama will have moving into his first 100 days.


Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search