Stimulus Bankruptcy Reform: Call Better Democrats

by: Chris Bowers

Tue Jan 13, 2009 at 17:33


Yesterday, David and I both blogged about passing mortgage related bankruptcy reform in the stimulus package (see David's post and my post). The specific legislation we are seeking to include in the stimulus is, in the House, HR 225 from Representative Brad Miller and, in the Senate, S 61 from Dick Durbin. The legislation will allow bankruptcy judges to re-write mortgages according to current home values rather than inflated "bubble" values, thus allowing hundreds of thousands, possibly millions, of people to keep their homes over the next two years. It is good legislation that will help lots of real people, and start putting the country back on track toward a post-bubble economy.

Here is the state of play on this legislation:

  1. Senator Durbin is leading the charge to have the legislation included in the stimulus package. Considering his Senate position (ranking behind only Reid) and his close relationship with President-elect Obama, and that he is reportedly taking the inclusion of this legislation in the Senate as his personal mission, there is a good chance he can succeed. However, at this time, there is no definitive word that he has succeeded.

  2. In the House, Brad Miller is basically a one-man campaign for this bill. Representative Miller and his staff are basically the only people around and available for this campaign. He is out-resourced by the opponents of the bill, as the next bullet point discusses.

  3. In late 2007, Miller's bill was defeated by an alliance of Blue Dogs and the banking and realtor lobbies. At the behest of the National Association of Realtors, which gives more money to congressional candidates than any other PAC in the country, and which has 28 people working on the Hill full time as either lobbyists or researchers, sixteen Blue Dogs sent a letter to the House leadership asking them to spike the bill. The end result was that the bill was delayed, severely watered down, and ultimately deemed insufficient by the bill's sponsor, Brad Miller. There is every reason to expect a similar effort will be attempted to spike the bill this time around. And, as I already noted, the realtors and their Blue Dog lackeys have a lot more resources than Dick Durbin and Brad Miller, who are operating this campaign almost entirely by themselves.
To prevent this attempt to pass mortgage related bankruptcy reform, and thus a partial repeal of the odious Bankruptcy Bill of 2005, the strategy is simple: try to get as many Representatives and Senators supporting the inclusion of this legislation in the stimulus as possible. However, recognizing the relatively small size of our activist base here on Open Left, we can't just expect readers here to call their members of Congress, and the end result to be that enough members feel sufficiently pressured from their constituents to back the inclusion of this legislation in the stimulus. Instead, we have to be more selective in our targets, and choose carefully where we target our pressure.

So, my first idea is for Open Left readers to try and get all of our Better Democrats, for whom we raised money in 2008 and who are now members of Congress, to become sponsors of the bill and support its inclusion in the stimulus. Donna Edwards (MD-04) and Alan Grayson (FL-08) are already sponsors of H.R. 225, so they are spoken for. However, there are five members of the House and Senate from the Better Democrats page that have not yet sponsored either HR 225 (if they are House members) or S 61 (if they are Senators). Here are those four, along with the phone numbers of their Washington, D.C. offices:

The idea behind targeting these five is that, even though few of us are constituents of these five members of Congress, most of us can call as donors to one or more of these five members of Congress.

So, please, politely contact one of these five, and leave a message asking for to become a co-sponsor of either HR 225 (for House members) or S 61 (for Senators). Additionally, urge them to support the inclusion of this legislation in the stimulus package. If they ask for your constituent information and you are not a constituent, indicate that you were a donor to the 2008 campaign of that member of Congress.

Don't worry about it being after hours in D.C.  If no one answers, leave a message-it will still be heard. Also, remember that we are entering a new era in D.C. where pressure like this can actually work. For example, Obama shelved his stimulus business tax cut proposal today, after Senators and grassroots alike raised their voice. Hopefully, we can get a few more sponsors for these bills as a result of this action. If it works, we can more onto more targets.

Chris Bowers :: Stimulus Bankruptcy Reform: Call Better Democrats

Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
For What It's Worth (4.00 / 3)
I called my Representative, Mike Thompson (CA-1), a blue dog, about HR 225.  My experience is that you get better results if you call the local (as opposed to the D.C.) office.  You get to talk to a career staffer instead of an intern. Thompson's Eureka staffer told me Thompson is starting to edge away from his blue dog affiliations.  She noted that he is fiscally conservative, but that "everything has changed in the economy" since 2007.  She suggested that we all contact Miller's office to get e-mail updates for purposes of contacting our Representatives at critical points in the process.

Great work (4.00 / 1)
Great work, good points, and good news. Well done! If Thompson flips, then we are clearly moving in the right direction.

[ Parent ]
Great insight (0.00 / 0)
I'm going to call a Rep near me (not my Rep) Bob Etheridge (NC 2) a blue dog and near Brad Miller's district to see whether he supports HR 225. I'm pretty sure my Rep. David Price (NC 4) is for it.Thanks for this!

[ Parent ]
Question about donations (4.00 / 1)
Is it generally acceptable to mention that, or does it make it sound like you are trying to buy influence?

If you made a donation (0.00 / 0)
I don't see why it is a problem to mention it. It is simply true.

But I brought it up mainly as a means to respond to any criticism that you are not a constituent. Maybe you are not a constituent, but this way you can show you are an interested party.


[ Parent ]
Good idea, Chris (4.00 / 1)
I contacted one of his staff via another social network to let Merkley know I hope he will support S 61.

Is there a taboo here about mentioning Dennis Kucinich? (0.00 / 0)

The great war-correspondent Chris Hedges called Kucinich the "one true voice" among Democratic candidates in the primaries, and he's still the only Democrat with national name-recognition above single-digits that I would trust about anything.

But somehow his name almost never appears on Open Left, or Daily Kos, or MyDD, or HuffPo...

Why isn't this guy the hero and standard-bearer for the whole progressive movement, insofar as it's actually a movement and not just a fringe?

So now I'm hearing about Gary Peters and Jeff Merkley, and a lot of other names that sound like a random selection out of the Manhattan phonebook, and the very idea of anything like leadership seems to be anathema for progressives!

Dennis Kucinich was right about the bail-out before they flushed the first half of it down a black hole, and he's right now, but you could read through the whole progressive blogosphere and come away with the idea that it's all chiefs and no Indians, and that's not far from the truth.

So good luck with Peters and Merkley, and the whole mob of no-name progressives everywhere, and the next time some charismatic con-man like Obama carries off the Democratic nomination with a platform of bullshit and a plan to sell us all out to the banks, maybe "progressives" should just start calling themselves the permanent piss-and-moan micro-minority, and that would be "one true voice" in the progressive blogosphere.


Um (0.00 / 0)
Given that your post in off-topic as we are talking about bankruptcy reform in this post, given that the Better Democrats 2008 page was entirely for challengers rather than incumbents, given that you are issuing a blanket missive to several blogs besides this one, and given your clear dislike and invective toward those blogs, it is hard to take your comment as anything except trolling.  

[ Parent ]
A movement without a leader (0.00 / 0)
So Kucinich talking about an enormous power-grab by the banks that "threatens the national security of the United States" is off-topic because your post was only concerned with one relatively minor aspect of the enormous flow of money into the financial services industry?

Sub-prime mortgages total $700 billion, and meanwhile the Federal reserve has extended $4 trillion in unaccountable assumption of loans, guarantees, and nobody knows what else to international banks.

Kucinich is the only politician in Washington who is actually dealing the the full scope of this humongous con game, and nobody in the M$M or the liberal-progressive blogosphere wants to know.

Is that a problem?

So anybody who criticizes your focus on a very small-potatoes reform of bankruptcy laws which will be swallowed up like a drop in the ocean by the vast outflow of money from the Treasury and the Federal Reserve...

Anybody who says you should back off and look at the big picture that Kucinich has been painting for you again and again ever since before the meltdown began...

Anybody who says the progressive "movement" needs a real leader if it's ever going to be anything except a few whiners on the edge of political reality...

Anybody who doesn't think that a cacaphony of tiny voices can overcome the enormous advantages of corporate media...

Anybody like that must be a troll, because otherwise you might have to answer a few questions that you can't answer, and deal with the absolute impotence of progressives in the last election-cycle, which you want to pretend never happened.

We got killed, and now the same progressives who never moved Obama an inch on any issue keep pretending that everything will be ever so much better now that he doesn't even have to run for anything for four long years.

And how will it get so much better?

Is there any conceivable sense in which progressives speak with one voice against the ultra-disciplined always on-message neo-cons and the rest of the Republican Party?

Of course not!

Obama is our virtual spokesperson,  and now he and George W. Bush are stampeding the last few dollars out of the Treasury to feed the same speculators who ruined us!

But anybody who thinks that tiny initiatives by Peters and Merkley won't save us...

What could they be, except a troll?


[ Parent ]
Chris, this guy is a Palin supporter (0.00 / 0)
He was a long-time troll over at MyDD.

[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search